Claremont School Board Finance Committee — December 12, 2025

Second FY2026–27 budget work session of the two-member Finance Sub-Committee, five days before the budget models reached the full board. Built from the CCTV recording and its dialogue transcript; no agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting has been located in any district share, so the item list is reconstructed and the timeline below is the only public account of what was said. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Finance Sub-Committee of the Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Members: Candace Crawford (chair) and Heather Whitney (also board chair). Two members, so both are needed for a quorum.
Date
Friday, December 12, 2025
Start time
9:30 a.m., as scheduled in the committee’s own November 12, 2025 minutes (“Friday, Dec. 12 @ 9:30 am @ Tech Center with CCTV coverage”). The chair opens the recording at 0:00:03: “It’s 930.” Adjourned at 1:27:27 (“Let’s adjourn the meeting at 11:00”); the recording runs 1:27:31, which fits.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the November 12 minutes; speakers refer to “this facility” when discussing the alternative program housed at the Tech Center.
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board : Finance Committee - 12/12/25 (1:27:31; call to order through adjournment)
Minutes
None located. Not in the 12/17/25, 1/7/26, 1/21/26 or 2/4/26 board packets as indexed in MAP.md, nor in the district’s archives checked for MAP.md on 2026-08-23. A Drive search for the dotted date and for “Finance” files modified after December 1, 2025 found nothing on 2026-09-25; the district’s Claremont Finance Sub Committee folder (last modified December 1, 2025) cannot be listed through the Drive API, so its contents are unverified. See flag 1.

Participants

Everyone heard on the recording. With no minutes for this meeting, names and roles follow the committee’s November 12, 2025 minutes, which list the same four people, and the December 17, 2025 board minutes’ administration header. No public comment period was held and no member of the public speaks on the recording.
NameRoleParticipation
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance Sub-Committee chairPresided. Pressed on the substitute line ($250,000 to “400”, then $185,000), counted the SAU build at thirteen, then fourteen posts, asked where the behavior programs sit in the budget, and directed that the budget plan for the alternative program at Bluff. 327 dialogue rows.
Heather WhitneyBoard chair; Finance Sub-Committee memberAsked whether last year’s budget figure ever reflected the district’s needs; pressed on which of 78 vacancies are educationally vital, on aligning spending to academic achievement, on the board’s earlier commitment to move the alternative program out of the Tech Center, on the grant-funded social worker and on nurse staffing. 294 rows.
Matt AngellSenior Comptroller / Interim Business Administrator, SAU 6Presented the initial four-school operating budget at about 2%, the vacancy and benefit assumptions, the SAU staffing build, the substitute and athletics lines and the Bluff School lease idea. Rendered “Matt Angel” in the transcript. 292 rows.
Kerry KennedyInterim Superintendent, SAU 6Reported that the CAMP and Academy behavior programs are paid with no budget line; described a regional special-education consortium under discussion with other superintendents; asked that the next session be carried on CCTV. 66 rows.

Named on the record but not present: “Mary”, the prior budget preparer (surname not stated on the recording), and “Josh”, the CCTV operator whose availability decides whether the next session is televised.

Agenda

No agenda was posted and none has been located. The item list below is reconstructed from the chair’s opening and her transitions on the recording.

Reconstructed item list, with the time each subject was taken up.
Taken upItemReconstructed from the recording
0:00:031. Call to order“The finance committee of the Claremont School Board is now in session. It’s 930. And we are discussing the budget for the upcoming year.” No roll call, no approval of prior minutes, no public comment period.
0:00:222. Status of the four-school model; payroll-system defectAn initial model exists, but “the system didn’t calculate employee withholdings for a certain group of employees”, about 101 of them (0:00:45).
0:02:393. Was the current budget’s starting figure valid?Whitney’s question, and the two budgeting “models” Angell describes in reply. See flag 6.
0:13:184. Vacancies and the SAU staffing build78 positions vacant today; about 61 in the model; the SAU build read out post by post.
0:30:375. The bottom line“I’m at a 2% increase”, possibly “a 2.5% increase” with retirement costs. See flag 7.
0:31:446. Line by line: substitutes, behavior programs, secretaries, athletics, artsFull-time substitutes; programs paid with no budget line (flag 2); program-based budgeting; athletics and arts restored.
0:50:557. Three schools versus four“What is the cost difference between a three school and a four school?” Kennedy: “We haven’t gotten there yet.”
0:54:398. Alternative program, Masonic Temple, Bluff SchoolThe board’s earlier motion to move the program; direction to budget for it at Bluff. See flag 4.
1:13:449. Next meetingA further session set for Monday at 1:00 p.m. See flag 8.
1:16:1710. Closing questionsProgram alignment to academics, athletics line items, the orange health plan, the grant-funded social worker, nurse staffing.
1:27:2711. Adjournment“Let’s adjourn the meeting at 11:00.” No motion or vote on the recording.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are the transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:03Call to order“The finance committee of the Claremont School Board is now in session. It’s 930.” The chair hands straight to Angell for “an update on where we stand on the budget.” No roll call and no approval of the December 10 session’s minutes.MEDIUM
0:00:22Payroll system will not calculate withholdings for about 101 employees“The problem I’m running into is, is the system didn’t calculate employee withholdings for a certain group of employees.” At 0:00:49: “I’ve not seen the system do this. So it’s a setup issue, or there’s an issue with, how I’m processing it.” Last year’s file shows the same problem at 0:01:13: “I can see that Mary had the same problem because there’s one particular employee withholding that you can tell it’s just an even number. And so she just forced it in the budget.”OBSERVATION
0:01:35Vacant positions budgeted without benefitsAngell: health insurance “had to have been budgeted lower than what your available positions are”; “normally I budget for a two person plan for vacant positions.” Whitney at 0:02:09: “they put in the salary that was attached to that vacant position, but did not put in the full comp package estimate for those vacant positions.”OBSERVATION
0:03:44“Was that actually reflective of our needs”Whitney: “we know 100% that the tax rate was calculated incorrectly. Now I want to know was the budget that the tax rate was based on. Was that actually reflective of our needs or was that number target”. Angell at 0:04:12: “I have to give you kind of a wishy washy, washy answer because there’s there’s two schools of thought.”OBSERVATION
0:05:09“Deliberately undervalued”After Whitney supplies the word: “Deliberately undervalue it. Okay. Right. And I’m getting the sense that they deliberately undervalued it.” Budgeting each remaining position, health insurance comes out “an increase of 23% over the prior year” (0:05:44), against the 11.3% he reaches with his own vacancy assumption (0:07:09).OBSERVATION
0:06:42$1 of health insurance per predicted vacancy“when I’m doing the operating budget, I assume that I’m going to have about 23 vacancies.” At 0:06:51: “So for health insurance for those 23 people in the budget, I put in $1.” If the posts are filled, at 0:13:59: “so now we have a budget problem. I’d love to solve that problem”.OBSERVATION
0:08:03Two assumption modelsAngell: “it’s not necessarily incorrect. It’s just a different assumption model. And so they’ve constrained the budget as much as possible to try to reduce the tax rate as much as possible.” Whitney at 0:08:47: “it’s an assumption that puts us at higher risk of where we are right now.” Crawford at 0:08:53: “It’s it’s not a reliable estimate. It’s a fake.”OBSERVATION
0:08:59Administrators’ professional development“in the collective bargaining agreement for the administrators. It requires the district to fund about $3,000 in professional development per administrator.” The current budget carries “like $1,000 per day” (0:09:17; “per day” as transcribed). At 0:09:31: “It doesn’t say it’s noncompliance.” Crawford at 0:11:35: “I would encourage you not to use a max unless you see that Max has been used in the past every single time.”OBSERVATION
0:11:52The committee’s budgeting instructionCrawford: “we’re asking you to budget estimate with a two person recognizing some will be one. Some will be family. Yes, but a realistic estimate is the two person. Yeah. I want you to apply that same theory to the rest of your modeling.” No document records this instruction.MEDIUM
0:13:1878 vacancies, and what they mean“We’re about 78 positions vacant.” Whitney at 0:15:09: someone “who wasn’t watching these meetings” would think “we need 78 more people”; she asks which are “Vital positions”. Angell’s first example at 0:15:41: “We’re losing our health teacher in the middle school.”
0:17:1561 vacancies in the model; the SAU build“the budget model has about 61 vacancies in it.” At 0:17:55: “For the 61, we’ve also added back the saw [SAU]”. Posts read out at 0:18:15: superintendent, business administrator, accountant, AP/payroll clerk, HR manager, HR coordinator, special education director, assistant student services director, two special-education admin assistants, admin assistants for the superintendent and for grants and curriculum, a grants/curriculum director, and a data manager whose office “is literally a closet”. Crawford counts thirteen, then fourteen, against “more than 13” last year (0:22:01).
0:22:36Curriculum coordinators deferredAngell: two more positions the board “really needs to consider”, one for math and one for reading. Whitney at 0:22:56: “an absolute imperative.” Crawford at 0:25:05: “that might be a year or two situation.” Angell at 0:25:21: “School districts move in decades.”
0:27:31Dental coverage“About 15% of our, employees don’t get dental.” The district pays 50% (0:28:56); full coverage “it’s only going to cost about $300,000” (0:29:05). Angell at 0:29:41: “these people are not taking care of themselves.” Crawford: “It’s not today and tomorrow.” (Cassandra Edwards answered this exchange at the December 17 board meeting.)
0:30:19The first bottom lineCrawford: a board target of no more than 3% “is bogus because we don’t know what the starting point was.” Angell at 0:30:37: “So right now where I’m at, I’m at a 2% increase.” With New Hampshire retirement at 0:31:01: “an additional 3 to $400,000. Okay. So it may push it up to, like, a 2.5% increase.”OBSERVATION
0:31:44Full-time substitutesEach elementary school wants a full-time substitute at “about $100,000” with benefits (0:32:05); Crawford: “That goes from 250 to 400.” Angell at 0:35:22: “Right now I have the sub line at 185,000.” His aim at 0:35:52: “at least a 0% increase or a slight reduction”. Crawford at 0:38:23: “budgets are best estimate.”
0:34:35A substitute under contract with no budget line“There’s only one full time sub right now in the district and she doesn’t have a budget. She doesn’t. She was offered a contract before I was hired and brought on board. And so there’s no budget lined up for her position.” Crawford at 0:34:56: “She’s not in the current budget.” Angell: Right.MEDIUM
0:39:03Interventionists are not substitutesWhitney: redeploying teachers as permanent substitutes “takes them out of the interventionist role.” Angell at 0:39:11: “As administration, we need to make sure that the interventionists are not being used as substitutes.” All three agree.POSITIVE
0:40:45Behavior programs paid from other linesAngell: “The the other thing that wasn’t in the budget is, some of the alt ed models.” Kennedy at 0:41:07: “the camp and the academy that physically sit here right now. They were not in a budget. So they were proposed in a model of instruction, but budgetary. Nobody put a line item in.” At 0:41:45: “They’re they’re being paid, but they’re not budgeted under a certain line item.” At 0:41:53: “They’re cannibalizing other budget.” At 0:42:14: “there was a spreadsheet behind the scenes … when you went back to vision, it was never in there.”MEDIUM
0:42:40Budgeting by program“I’ve asked each of the building principles to prepare their budget based upon program rather than line item.” The high school sent a course-level spreadsheet; two schools sent “supplies, $1,000”. At 0:43:49: “We’re not where we need to be. Where I can explain to the public that first grade costs this amount of money.”POSITIVE
0:45:06Athletics and the arts restored“I put in exactly what the athletic director requested, and, I, I’m pretty certain I overestimated in the, stipends for athletics.” The CBA “specifically says which teams have to be funded” (0:45:34). Buildings got “exactly what each of the buildings asked for” (0:46:10). Whitney at 0:46:31: “So it’s restorative. It’s a restorative budget.” Angell: “It will be like this year never happened.”OBSERVATION
0:46:45Academic priority in the program of studiesWhitney: the schools’ requests “mirror the programs that were, offered prior to I called the tsunami event” (0:49:34); “if we are actually going to value align ourselves to target student achievement, then we need to have our budget and our program … be aligned with those values.”
0:50:55Three schools versus fourCrawford: “What is the cost difference between a three school and a four school?” Kennedy: “We haven’t gotten there yet.” Angell at 0:51:32: moving to three schools means “eliminating a building principal custodian secretary. But you’re not eliminating so much the number of teachers.” Crawford at 0:51:59: “the difference between the four and the three is minimal cost wise, but it has ramifications.” Whitney at 0:52:50 on building age: “Dessner [Disnard], 1958. Maple, 1946.”OBSERVATION
0:54:39The board’s earlier motion on the alternative programWhitney: “I went back and looked at some of the minutes … There was a motion made that was essentially, we are going to move this program for fiscal year 26.” Crawford at 0:55:12: that is why “The the Masonic building was purchased.” Whitney at 0:55:16: the board, “with the support of the Citizens Advisory Group and the tech subcommittee”, made a public motion, and “it is not in the best interest of the students that are in this type of program to be housed within a large school.”OBSERVATION
0:57:26“He hasn’t budgeted for it”Whitney: “But I’m hearing from Matt. He hasn’t budgeted for it.” Angell at 0:57:57: “The cost of a building, right? Is not in the current year operating budget.” At 0:58:04: “Do we want to keep the Masonic Temple or not?” At 1:04:06, asked whether a location is budgeted: “I do not.”OBSERVATION
0:59:11Bluff School as the homeCrawford: “because of this past year’s, Fiasco activity, we have an additional school building that might be available. I’m talking about bluff.” Angell at 0:59:54: rent it to a nonprofit “that would offer that service for us for a fee.” Whitney at 1:00:30: “we could bring back almost 1.2 and out of district savings”. Angell at 1:01:42: in ten years “that program will not be viable by itself within the district.”OBSERVATION
1:02:09Regional special-education consortiumKennedy: “I meet every few weeks right now” with the southwest superintendents; “we each kind of pay into this consortium. And so there’s like a slot” (1:02:55). At 1:03:32: “Camp was not budgeted.”
1:08:00Direction on the alternative programCrawford: “From my perspective right now, I don’t see any reason why it will be in this facility.” Whitney at 1:08:32: “that has to be a directive that is given to Matt.” Crawford: “To me, I am only one person.” At 1:08:47: “not having that alternative program in this facility should be the expectation.” Whitney: “Then he needs to budget for that.”MEDIUM
1:08:58A lease plan for BluffAngell: “The recommendation that’s probably going to come from administration is, is to, to ask the school board to lease the Bluff School”, with “two different schools with inside of bluff” and the remaining space leased “to a nonprofit to offer special education services.” Whitney at 1:09:43: “But that is speculative. The only way that would be feasible is if we could actually find that nonprofit.” Angell: “we’re going to have to create it ourselves.”OBSERVATION
1:11:18The Masonic TempleWhitney: in the administrators’ opinion the Masonic Temple is “like a non thing that just needs to go away.” Angell at 1:11:34: “It was poorly executed.” At 1:12:00, as transcribed: “Comfortable with how administration asked the school board to buy it.” (The opening of that sentence is lost; the page does not supply it.) Kennedy at 1:12:12: “It happened. Move on. I don’t see the value in it.” At 1:12:25: “So ideally in March that would be on the ballot”. The November 12 minutes record a March 2026 warrant article to sell the building.OBSERVATION
1:13:22Direction given and acceptedCrawford: “In your budget. You’re going to plan for the camp and all. And yes going to bluff.” Kennedy: “That’s our ideal.” Angell at 1:13:32: “I love the direction that you’re giving me. Yes. And I will make sure that that happens.”MEDIUM
1:13:55Scheduling, and a Tuesday-night gatheringCrawford: “I know you’re not available during the day on Monday or Tuesday. I met with you on Tuesday afternoon, and then Heather, you and I get together on Tuesday night.” Kennedy at 1:14:15: “we can’t make decisions or, like, we’re not. This isn’t a decision making.”MEDIUM
1:14:34A Monday session, “on CCTV”Kennedy, who cannot attend: “Just show me the minutes or whatever.” At 1:14:43: “I’ll watch the video.” At 1:15:08: “Do you want it on CCTV? My assumption is that you’ll want it on CCTV if Josh can accommodate that.” Crawford at 1:15:36: “I’ll ask Josh if he can do it Monday at 1:00.” Angell at 1:15:41: “The milestone in a slideshow.”OBSERVATION POSITIVE
1:17:05Small costs add up; athletics line itemsWhitney: “we keep thinking like 3500 bucks is in anything, or $10,000 isn’t anything until like, and everybody thinks that way, and then you have all of a sudden you have $5 million of debt”. At 1:20:18: “whatever we decide we’re funding and we’re offering, we need to make sure it’s line item budgeted across all departments”. Crawford at 1:20:34: athletics expenses should “go through the alumni association and not done on the side”.POSITIVE
1:23:10The grant-funded social workerWhitney: “the additional social worker we had is under grant funding. And the last thing I want is for that to get missed”. Angell at 1:23:48: “I don’t think I added any social workers.” Whitney at 1:24:15: either the grant continues or “we need to consider whether or not we will we will assume it in the general.”POSITIVE
1:24:45School nurse staffingWhitney: “you do not need to have a registered nurse in every building.” Kennedy at 1:25:12: overseeing someone “not within your building” is a problem. Whitney at 1:25:23: “the RSA does allow a lot of flexibility”. Crawford at 1:26:14: “I think we have RSA and then we have actual implementation of the RSA.”OBSERVATION
1:27:27Adjournment“Let’s adjourn the meeting at 11:00.” The models reached the full board five days later: see the December 17 page.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule.

MEDIUM No minutes of this televised subcommittee meeting have been located, and the directions it gave exist in no document

A subcommittee of a school board is a public body: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) reaches “any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof”. RSA 91-A:2, II requires its minutes to be “promptly recorded and open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting”, with the members present, the subject matter, final decisions, and (for meetings from August 22, 2025) the start and end times and who produced the minutes. None have been located for December 12: not in the four later board packets MAP.md indexes, and not by Drive search on 2026-09-25. The loss is concrete. The instruction to budget vacancies at a two-person health plan (0:11:52) and the direction to plan for the alternative program at Bluff (1:13:22–1:13:32) are recorded only on tape. The interim superintendent herself expected minutes: “Just show me the minutes or whatever” (1:14:34).

Graded MEDIUM on the mitigated limb of the project’s rule: the meeting was noticed in the committee’s own November 12 minutes, which reached the public in the December 3 board packet, and the committee demonstrably keeps minutes. The chair wrote the November 12 set, told the board on November 19 (show 16982, at 2 h 33 min into that recording) that the committee’s minutes were on the website, and on December 3 (show 17017, at 2 h 34 min) that posting had lapsed and a copy would travel with the board agenda. The negative is also limited by method: the district’s Finance Sub Committee folder cannot be listed through the Drive API, and a Drive search does not prove absence. Production of dated minutes for December 10 and 12 would clear this; a refused request to inspect them would raise it.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (committees and subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes contents; 5 business days; 2025, 112:1, eff. Aug. 22, 2025; text read 2026-09-25); Copy of Finance 11.12.25.docx (the committee’s November 12 minutes, in the 12/3/25 board packet); the December 10 session.

MEDIUM A substitute’s contract and two behavior programs are being paid with no budget line behind them

The interim business administrator said the district’s one full-time substitute “was offered a contract before I was hired” and “there’s no budget lined up for her position” (0:34:35); the chair confirmed she is “not in the current budget”. The interim superintendent said the CAMP and Academy behavior programs “were not in a budget”, are “being paid, but they’re not budgeted under a certain line item”, and are “cannibalizing other budget” (0:41:07–0:41:53), tracked on a spreadsheet outside the accounting system (0:42:14). She repeated the point to the full board on December 17, and the December 17 approved minutes record the alternative program as “out of compliance right now”.

RSA 32:8 bars a school board from paying or agreeing to pay money “for any purpose for which no appropriation has been made”, except as RSA 32:9–11 allow; RSA 32:10 lets the governing body transfer money between appropriations within the total voted, provided the records let a citizen see what was moved. RSA 189:39 has superintendents nominate and school boards elect all teachers, and RSA 197:23-a lets the treasurer pay only on the board’s orders. These are questions, not findings: the recording does not say whether the board voted the substitute’s contract, a substitute may not be a “teacher” under 189:39, and paying from another line is lawful if it is a documented transfer. The record needed to answer them is the transfer documentation, which the speakers describe as not existing in the accounting system.

Sources: RSA 32:8 (no payment for a purpose with no appropriation; 1993, 332:1); RSA 32:10 (transfers between appropriations; records open to citizens; 2017, 127:4); RSA 189:39 (superintendent nominates, board elects teachers); RSA 197:23-a (treasurer pays only on board orders); 12.17.25 Approved CSB Meeting Minutes.

MEDIUM Both members of a two-member public body plan to meet outside a noticed session while its budget work is under way

With two members, Crawford and Whitney together are this subcommittee’s quorum. Under RSA 91-A:2, I a “meeting” is “the convening of a quorum of the membership of a public body” to discuss or act on matters within its jurisdiction, and it requires notice and minutes. While scheduling the next session the chair said: “I met with you on Tuesday afternoon, and then Heather, you and I get together on Tuesday night” (1:13:55). The interim superintendent answered at once that “we can’t make decisions … This isn’t a decision making” body (1:14:15). In the same stretch the committee gave the business administrator budget directions he undertook to carry out (1:13:32). RSA 91-A:2-a, II adds that communications outside a meeting “shall not be used to circumvent the spirit and purpose” of the chapter.

Limits: the recording does not say what the Tuesday-night gathering was for, and Whitney is also the board chair, so the two may confer on board business that is not committee business. A chance or social encounter is not a meeting if no decisions are made. The flag rests on the timing and the context, and on the fact that none of this body’s December sessions has minutes against which to check it.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I and II (meeting of a quorum; notice and minutes); RSA 91-A:2-a, II (communications outside a meeting; 2008, 303:4); RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d).

OBSERVATION A lease of Bluff School to a district-created nonprofit would engage RSA 194:61

The administration’s likely recommendation, per Angell, is to lease Bluff School, run a district program in part of it and lease the rest to a special-education nonprofit that “we’re going to have to create it ourselves” (1:08:58–1:09:51). The Masonic Temple, bought under an earlier board motion to move the alternative program out of the Tech Center (0:54:39), was headed for a March 2026 sale article per the committee’s November 12 minutes. RSA 194:61 makes a sale or lease of unused district facilities subject to an approved chartered public school’s right of first refusal and requires an annual report of unused facilities. Nothing was decided here and no breach is asserted; the point is that the statute belongs in the board’s paperwork before either the lease or the sale moves.

Sources: RSA 194:61 (unused facilities; charter school right of first refusal; 2023, 198:3); Copy of Finance 11.12.25.docx (March 2026 warrant article to sell the Masonic Temple).

OBSERVATION A contractual professional-development amount carried at about a third of its value

Angell said the administrators’ agreement requires “about $3,000 in professional development per administrator” while the current budget carries about $1,000 (0:08:59–0:09:17), and added: “It doesn’t say it’s noncompliance.” Crawford defended budgeting to actual use and set the rule of not budgeting to a contractual maximum unless it is always used (0:11:35). Athletics runs the other way, with the teacher agreement fixing which teams are funded (0:45:34). No verified rule is breached by under-budgeting a contractual line; the obligation comes from the agreement, and a short estimate shows up as a variance. A “cost item” under RSA 273-A:1, IV is a bargained benefit whose implementation requires an appropriation, which is why these lines matter at budget time.

Sources: RSA 273-A:1, IV (“cost item”); the recording at the timestamps above.

OBSERVATION The people now building the budget describe last year’s benefit assumptions as undervalued; the chair calls them “a fake”

Angell’s arithmetic: budgeting benefits for each remaining position produces a 23% health-insurance increase even after cuts (0:05:44), which he reads as the current budget having carried vacant positions without benefits (0:01:35; Whitney at 0:02:09). “I’m getting the sense that they deliberately undervalued it” (0:05:09). Crawford: “It’s a fake” (0:08:53). Angell’s own model uses a smaller dose of the same technique, $1 of health insurance for each of about 23 predicted vacancies (0:06:51), and he framed both as assumption models rather than errors (0:08:03). No verified rule makes a tight assumption unlawful on its face; a budget is an estimate. The point is recorded because the committee itself doubted the starting figure every later comparison relies on, and testing it is audit work, not something the recording can settle.

Sources: the recording at the timestamps above. No rule is cited; none was identified that these assumptions breach.

OBSERVATION The committee held “a 2% increase” on December 12; the board saw 3.89% on December 17

Angell put the four-school model at “a 2% increase”, perhaps “a 2.5% increase” with retirement costs (0:30:37–0:31:01), against his goal of “at least a 0% increase or a slight reduction” (0:35:52). The December 17 approved minutes record the four-school model at $44,861,008 and the three-school model at $43,968,104 against a current $43,179,564: 3.89% and 1.83%. The three-school model, which this session treated as close in cost to four (“minimal cost wise”, 0:51:59; the cost difference not yet worked out, 0:50:59), arrived about $893,000 cheaper. A working figure that changes as the model is finished is normal, and this one was expressly provisional while the payroll system failed to calculate withholdings for about 101 employees. The reasoning that closed the gap is in no document; the session planned for Monday, December 15 (flag 8) may be where it happened.

Sources: 12.17.25 Approved CSB Meeting Minutes; 4-School Model - FY 26-27 Operating Budget 12.16.2026.pdf and 3-School Model - FY 26-27 Operating Budget 12.16.2026.pdf the “2026” in both file names is the district’s typo; December 17 page.

OBSERVATION A further session was set for Monday, December 15, and no record of it has been found

The committee fixed another working session for Monday at 1:00 p.m., with the interim superintendent asking that it be televised and the chair undertaking to ask the CCTV operator (1:15:08–1:15:36). MAP.md lists no recording between this show and the December 17 board meeting, and no notice, packet or minutes for a December 15 session has been located. The Cablecast API refused this review’s request for the neighboring show numbers, so a recording filed under another title cannot be ruled out. Whether the session was held, moved, or held off camera cannot be told from the outside.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (24-hour notice; minutes); the recording at the timestamps above.

OBSERVATION On nurse staffing, New Hampshire law permits rather than requires a school nurse

Whitney argued that one registered nurse can direct protocol-driven care across buildings (1:24:45–1:25:51), and earlier said “we’re not required to have a nurse” (0:59:39); Crawford distinguished “RSA and then … actual implementation” (1:26:14). The statute supports Whitney’s premise: RSA 200:27 says a district “may provide” school nursing services, and RSA 200:29 “may nominate and … appoint” nurses. RSA 200:38 places immunization and examination duties on the nurse, so the practical question is who performs those duties in each building. This page does not assess the licensing and delegation questions Kennedy raised.

Sources: RSA 200:27; RSA 200:29; RSA 200:38.

POSITIVE A televised subcommittee, program-based budgeting, and posts kept from disappearing by accident

Nothing in RSA 91-A requires a subcommittee to be televised; this one was, and the interim superintendent asked that the next session be carried too (1:15:08). Angell has asked principals to budget “based upon program rather than line item” and said plainly that the district cannot yet tell the public what a grade costs (0:42:40–0:43:49). Whitney asked that whatever the district offers be “line item budgeted across all departments” rather than carried by the alumni association (1:20:18), and flagged the grant-funded social worker so that keeping the post is a decision (1:23:10). All three agreed on the record that interventionists are not to be used as substitutes (0:39:11).

Context: RSA 91-A:2 (the open-meeting minimum these practices exceed).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page