Claremont School Board Finance Committee — January 6, 2025

Finance Subcommittee working session on the FY26 budget, built from the CCTV recording and the dialogue transcript alone: no notice, agenda, packet or minutes for this meeting was located in any district share. The building principals sat at the table while the committee went through the draft line by line, the evening before the full board voted to send the budget to public hearing. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Finance Subcommittee of the Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Members: Frank Sprague (subcommittee chair, per the January 7, 2025 agenda), Candace Crawford, Heather Whitney.
Date
Monday, January 6, 2025
Start time
Not stated in any available record. The recording opens mid-sentence, so the call to order is not on it; it runs 1:43:56 and ends with the adjournment at 1:43:53.
Location
Not stated in available records. Michelle Herrington’s remark about classroom space “here” at the Tech Center (1:13:54) suggests the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, the board’s regular venue in this period, but no record says so.
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Finance Meeting 1/6/24 (1:43:56; opens mid-sentence; the gallery title’s year is wrong, the meeting is in 2025)
Minutes
None located in the district’s public shares; see flag 1.

Participants

Everyone heard on the recording. With no minutes and no roll call on tape, attendance cannot be checked against an official record; names follow the January 7, 2025 approved board minutes and the dialogue file. Segment counts are dialogue-file rows.
NameRoleParticipation
Frank SpragueBoard vice chair; Finance Subcommittee chair117 rows. Pressed for the true cost of pre-K and the related-services FTEs behind it, raised minimum standards for unified arts, PE and health, asked for a presentation on out-of-district placement protocols, and answered “Yes. Adjourned.” at the close. The dialogue file labels him “School Board Member (Finance Committee)”.
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance Subcommittee member239 rows. Ran most of the questioning: agreed which draft to use, then took the draft item by item (tech ed, the SRVRTC teacher-education line, the Stevens summer program, the excluded CBAs and pre-K). The dialogue file describes her as presiding over this session.
Heather WhitneyBoard chair; Finance Subcommittee member147 rows. Read the running totals, proposed replacing elementary student services coordinators with social workers plus a director, and argued against restoring pre-K except as a universal program.
Mary HenryBusiness Administrator, SAU 6130 rows. Held the working draft (“version six”), produced each figure, and reported the default-budget comparison.
Chris PrattSuperintendent, SAU 698 rows. Raised the CMS guidance count and the Stevens activity account; asked whether the committee wanted another $150,000 cut; thanked the principals for taking “$1.5 million out of the budget”.
Frank RomeoPrincipal, Claremont Middle School77 rows. Described a school already running four teaching positions short; agreed to drop a guidance position; argued that eliminating pre-K contradicts the Title I priorities.
Michael McCoskerDirector of Student Services, SAU 654 rows. PRIDE program, related-services staffing at pre-K, the contracted-services line. Title per the January 7 minutes; the dialogue file labels him “Director of Special Education, SAU 6” and “Mike McCosker”.
Melissa LewisPrincipal, Disnard Elementary School24 rows. Explained what a student services coordinator does and why a social worker is not a substitute.
Michael HerringtonPrincipal, Stevens High School12 rows. The Stevens activity account and the summer-program figure. Several of his rows are marked uncertain (merged male cluster) in the dialogue file.
Mark BlountPrincipal, Maple Avenue Elementary School10 rows. The three district-wide life-skills programs housed at Maple; supported keeping the coordinators.
Michelle HerringtonAssistant Director, Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center2 rows. Where the new teacher-education program would be housed; Perkins funding and lab space. A different person from Michael Herrington.
MultipleCommittee membersOne row at 0:48:13, “Fine with me.”, two voices assenting to the Stevens summer figure.

Named but not present: Jennifer Maynard (speech-language pathologist) and Jess McLeod (out-of-district coordinator), named by Sprague at 0:21:13; “Holly” and “Miss Rhimes” at Stevens. Two different people named Whitney sit on this board; Whitney Skillen is not on this committee and is not heard. Three of seven board members took part, which is not a quorum of the full board.

Agenda

No agenda was located. This item list is reconstructed from the recording’s own transitions and is not an official agenda.
Taken upItem (reconstructed)What the recording shows
0:00:00Recording begins mid-questionNo call to order, roll call or statement of the body. The first words are Whitney’s question about “the congruence or the integration of district wide special education salaries and positions into existing programs”. See flag 6.
0:04:45Which draft to work fromCrawford: “there are about seven iterations here.” Henry: the copy being printed is “version six”.
0:06:51The starting total“490062 for a 2.82% increase prior to all of the CBA.”
0:08:13Questions to the principalsCMS guidance count; the Stevens activity account.
0:12:53Student services coordinators versus social workersWhitney’s proposal; the elementary principals object; dropped without a vote at 0:33:48.
0:35:00Crawford’s line-by-line reviewWhat the $2.6 million increase does and does not include; tech ed; SRVRTC teacher education; the Stevens summer program, agreed at about $15,000 at 0:48:13.
0:48:27Staffing cuts at CMS; guidance position removedRomeo on vacancies and schedule; the third CMS counselor position removed at 1:03:41.
1:05:09The cost of pre-K and related servicesSprague’s attempt to separate program cost from related-services cost; the contracted-services line “got zeroed”.
1:17:57Bottom line with the teachers’ agreement; default budget$1,005,062, 5.78%; default “90,000 more than the general budget”.
1:29:10Closing statements; pre-KState funding, household income, out-of-district placements, pre-K.
1:42:08Wrap-up and adjournmentHenry to produce “a printout of actually what was eliminated” that evening; adjourned at 1:43:53. No motion or vote was taken at any point.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction. With no minutes, this timeline is the only public account of the meeting.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:00Where special-education salaries sitWhitney, mid-question: “Are there embedded services that like stay within the building, stay within that program, but are, on district wide budget line items.” Henry: related services are district-wide (“They're all district wide.”) rather than on building lines, which governs every building figure discussed afterward.OBSERVATION
0:01:44PRIDE at Bluff; life skills at MapleMcCosker: PRIDE “Is a behavioral. Program program that was started in lieu of sending kids out of district”, now one program at Bluff with “Maybe 6 to 10” students; “we brought a kid back this year from a pretty costly out of district” placement. Whitney: “it was almost $1 million worth of special add [ed] cost, allocated to the Bluffs”, a school of “about 168 students”. Blount: “there are three district wide life skills programs housed at Maple.” Whitney: “So that just explains the 1.5 million to me.”
0:04:45“about seven iterations”Crawford: “can we all agree on the same copy to reference? I just want to make sure because there are about seven iterations here.” Henry: “that’s what she’s printing right now is version six.” Crawford: “I don’t print out 65 pages.” Henry had also revised the summary that day: “Because after Heather spoke to me, I went in and I made some changes.” Crawford’s copy showed 628; Whitney’s showed 490.OBSERVATION
0:06:51$490,062, a 2.82% increase before the CBAsWhitney: “The total to be raised before CVA [CBA] agreements is 490,062”; “490062 for a 2.82% increase prior to all of the CBA. So that does not include any of the CBA.” Crawford: “So the 490,000 is the increase. Let’s talk about what is in and what is out of that number.”
0:08:13CMS guidance: three in the draft, two agreedPratt: “we had talked originally about, keeping the guidance at two. And it’s at, it’s at three.” Romeo: “It’s returning back to two”, “with other necessary adjustments.” Settled later at 1:03:41.
0:09:30Stevens activity accountPratt asks where the vending money that once paid for the senior celebration now goes. Herrington: “I don’t think it generates a whole heck of a lot of money anymore”; “A lot of that money is used for, will help students that have issues with the class dues”, plus “Chromebook repairs for families that can’t quite do it.”
0:12:53Proposal: social workers and a director in place of coordinatorsWhitney proposes to “embed a social worker in every elementary school” and, from the salary savings, fund a “director of in-house special programs”; the aim, “in a budget neutral way”, is to “provide options for the principals to consider what will best serve their needs”. Pratt: the principals say “we all need the social workers”.
0:18:21Lewis: what a coordinator does“Now in my school it’s me. So I am the point of contact for special education. My student service coordinator does all 504 plans”. The positions were built “to help deal with a significant amount of behavior concerns”.
0:23:08“apples to potatoes”Lewis: “I appreciate the thought that goes into that because the social workers are key people. For me, you are comparing apples to potatoes.” Blount: at Maple “we share the IEP roles”, and his coordinator “does supervise and evaluate the para educators”.
0:26:22The proposal droppedWhitney: by days worked, the coordinators’ salary “rivals, the principal salary.” Crawford: “these guys who are the pros here prefer the three then. And its revenue neutral. Then I I’d say move on.” At 0:33:48: “since we’re on the 11th and a half hour of this budget process, I think that we need to move on.” No vote; the coordinators stay.
0:30:59Enrollment and identification rateWhitney: “168 at bluff, 262 at Maple. 257 at Disney [Disnard]. 335 at CMS or 79 at Stevens, and 23 identified preschool students and 20 typical.” The Stevens figure is garbled. Identification: “Exact 27% of our student population.”
0:35:00$2.6 million up, two driversCrawford: the draft “shows a $2.6 million increase”; special education in two schools up “1,000,005” and health insurance “1.5 million”: “$3 million that we had no control over”, so “somewhere we’ve made $400,000 of adjustments, adjustments down.”
0:36:59What the draft leaves outCrawford: “the s IRA [SREA] wage increase is not there. Isn’t that correct?” Henry: “That is correct.” “the parent [para] increases is not there.” “Correct.” “the preschool. There is no money for preschool in this one.” “That is correct.” Whitney: “23 identified, 20 typical whatever.”OBSERVATION
0:37:38CMS tech edCrawford: “was it a re configuration of where the dollars were or was a program cut?” Henry: “It went to regular editor [regular ed] because that’s where they belonged.” Romeo: shop and computers were combined when the teacher retired; “We do not plan on returning it.”
0:39:42SRVRTC teacher education: finding the lineCrawford: “I looked on Friday at the sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center. We talked about $100,000”; “I didn’t see it on Friday.” Henry: “it’s on page 40. And it’s near the bottom”; “SRB TV [SRVRTC] teaching program salaries.” Michelle Herrington at 0:41:12: the program “would probably be upstairs”.OBSERVATION
0:41:34Stevens summer program: $30,000 to about $15,000Crawford: “Stephens high school summer program. On Friday. I saw $30,000.” Henry: “It’s not there now.” Pratt: “I wasn’t here for Friday.” Crawford: “does it really cost $30,000 for summer school.” Herrington (row marked uncertain): “To run it the way that it used to be was a $30,000. Does it need to be that way? No.”; the bare-bones figure: “probably around half that, like maybe 15,000.” Assent at 0:48:13.OBSERVATION
0:48:27Crawford to employees watching“I’m sure that as people hear this, the the transcription of this meeting that employees might get panicked about, losing jobs”; “There’s shifting, but we haven’t necessarily cut positions.” Pratt: “Mr. Romeo did have to cut people.” Covered by attrition? “Not all of them. No, no.”POSITIVE
0:50:13Romeo: four teachers short“we are now operating down one science, one social studies, one English, one math. We’ve had to rearrange our schedule to accommodate that.” Further cuts mean “we’re going to have to change our schedule”. “I will the best I can to save teacher positions.” Enrollment: “from 400 to 338.” “if I have to go back to half your science and socialism [social studies], I don’t want to do right.”OBSERVATION
0:57:28Sprague on minimum standards“the United are United Arts, PE, health and such. They are all subject to minimum standards as well. At least they used to be.” Romeo agrees and adds a creative-writing element tied to new testing.OBSERVATION
1:02:41A CMS counselor position removed, the person keptHenry: “In fiscal year 25 budget. There’s two in fiscal year 26 there’s three”; the actual this year is three. Romeo at 1:03:41: “Take away the position. That’s a cost savings of taking away the position. And we have convinced her to stay in district because she is good.” “Should be rift [RIF’d].” A departing PE teacher will not be replaced: “If we adjust our schedule we’re not filling it.” Pratt: a third counselor had once been removed “without letting me know.”
1:05:09What pre-K costsSprague: “I’m trying to find out what pre-K costs.” McCosker: “The coda works three days a week period at pre-K”; the SLP “spends about 37 hours a week out of 40”. Sprague: “Where was I couldn’t find contracted services under district wide.” McCosker: “But the number got zeroed. I’m not. We’re not sure why.”; “We have about 20 people that are here as on contracted service”. Program figure: Whitney “500.”; Pratt “Is that 500,000, right.”OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
1:13:12“the last meeting we had”Pratt: “I think we spoke quite a bit about this at the last meeting we had when we were talking about pre-K.”OBSERVATION
1:15:23Will related-services staff still be busy?McCosker: “the people working with pre not with pre-K, have full case law [caseloads]. Yes.” At 1:17:07: “I don’t know that assuming is safe.” Then: “Assumptions are very dangerous. But my assumption is is no, these people will still be busy”; “one way or the other, we have to provide those services.”OBSERVATION
1:19:15The bottom line with the teachers’ agreementHenry: “we have the 2.6 million. That’s the actual increase. But then we take away 2.1 million in additional revenues”, to “that $490,000. So then I add the 515 on”: “1,005,062, which is a 5.78%, change increase”; “$81.47 per 100,000. So the increase on the rate would be $0.81.” The paraprofessional and administrator agreements were not yet ratified and are not in the figure.
1:22:47Another $150,000?Pratt: “is this committee asking the administration to cut another $150,000?” Crawford: “I am not.” Sprague: “Not yet.” Crawford: “Frank was an English major.”
1:23:20Default budget above the proposed budgetHenry: “the default is 90,000 more than the general budget right now”; “90,000 more, which is roughly another $0.08.” Crawford: “if they didn’t pass the budget, it would cost them more and they wouldn’t get the increase for the teachers”. Whitney: “making it a wash between the default and all the Warren [warrant] articles.” Henry at 1:26:03: “I honestly like to have a difference in default compared to budget because it gives people a choice.”OBSERVATION
1:26:03$1.5 million cut; the counselor still to come outHenry: “we’ve cut over 1.5 million already out of this budget.” Whitney: does the $1 million figure include the CMS counselor? Henry: “No, I haven’t taken that out yet. That’s probably another 100,000.”
1:29:10Pratt on costs“we’ve done this process right down to the 12th hour”; “education is not immune to that”; “from 2001 to 2019, education spending went from 2.3 billion to 3.3 billion.” Reported as spoken, not verified.
1:30:42Crawford: New Hampshire “50th”“New Hampshire is 50th in all states for, support for education, and if they double the amount that they spent on education, doubled it, they would still be 50th”. A speaker’s characterization, not verified here.
1:32:18Whitney: median household income“And the median household income in Claremont is $55,000.” Her aim: “to give people who are making $55,000 a year for their whole household feeling like they can pull the lever.” Reported as spoken.
1:32:53Out-of-district placementsSprague: “we characterize out of district placements as a cost we can’t control.” He wants “a presentation on the protocols. And how does a kid get placed out of district? This is very foreign to me.” Pratt: “I think it’s foreign to most.” No date was set.OBSERVATION
1:35:42Romeo: pre-K and Title I“I agree with the title one funding. We’ve talked about what we need to do. I think not having a pre K contradicts that.” Crawford: “for me to justify spending 500,000, I can’t do it given even without spending that it’s going up 5.78%.”OBSERVATION
1:37:43Whitney against restoring pre-K“the literature also shows that the benefits that children receive in preschool fade if they do not go into a high quality elementary school environment.” “our typical students that attended the preschool, when tracked through, scored lower than non attenders.” At 1:39:36: “it’s literally a lottery system”; a universal program would cost “between 4 and 6 million a year.” At 1:41:30: “I will not support it unless we can do it. Universal.”OBSERVATION
1:42:21CloseWhitney: “is there any way we could have a printout of actually what was eliminated?” Henry: “I will have that done as well this evening.” Pratt: “take $1.5 million out of the budget”; “We’re now going to break the bone and start getting into the marrow.” Crawford thanks the principals for letting the committee “hear your pushback when it’s appropriate.” At 1:43:53 Whitney: “We’re all good. Thank you. Adjourned. Frank.” Sprague: Yes. Adjourned.HIGH OBSERVATION

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule.

HIGH No minutes of this Finance Subcommittee meeting have been located, twenty months on

A school board subcommittee is a public body: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) reaches any school board “or any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof, or advisory committee thereto.” RSA 91-A:2, II requires its minutes, including the names of members and persons appearing, the subject matter and final decisions, and makes them available for inspection not more than five business days after the meeting. MAP.md records no packet and no minutes in the 2025 and FY 2025-2026 Meeting Documents archives or the Meeting Minutes share, and records the district’s “Claremont Finance Sub Committee” folder as empty on 2026-08-23. This run’s Drive query could not list that folder at all (its metadata shows a modification on 2025-12-01), so the negative rests on the August check and on the API, which is known to under-report. The January 7 approved minutes do not supply one either: they note only that “the finance committee meetings are all available for citizens to watch”. This is the unmitigated limb of the project’s rule: the committee met, no minutes are located, and nothing on the record explains it. The recording shows the Stevens summer program cut to about $15,000, a CMS counselor position removed, and a $1,005,062 bottom line assembled, none of which has a written public record.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (committees and subcommittees are public bodies); RSA 91-A:2, II (2023 codification, 2023, 188:1: minutes within 5 business days); Approved CSB minutes 1.7.25.

MEDIUM No notice or agenda located; who convened the meeting and when cannot be established

RSA 91-A:2, II requires notice of the time and place of a meeting at least 24 hours in advance, excluding Sundays and legal holidays. No notice or agenda for January 6, 2025 was located in any district share, and the meeting was not announced on the December 18, 2024 recordings, where Sprague said only that the committee would not meet again “until, the new year.” Because the recording opens mid-sentence, it carries no call to order, no roll call and no start time. Notice is given by posting, not by filing in Drive, so its absence from the share does not prove that none was posted; the grade is MEDIUM for that reason. What it does establish is that a resident cannot verify from the public record that this meeting was noticed or when it began.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2023 codification: 24 hours’ notice); RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d).

OBSERVATION The working drafts are not public, and the figures moved during the meeting

The committee worked from a 65-page “version six” while Crawford counted “about seven iterations” (0:04:45), and Whitney read from a summary Henry had revised that day, so the two members quoted different totals (490 and 628) for the first minutes. Figures changed on camera: the Stevens summer program, the SRVRTC teacher-education line, the CMS counselor position. The contracted-services line “got zeroed” for reasons nobody present could give (1:10:40), and the default-budget comparison Henry ran “last night” (1:23:20) is not in any packet. None of these iterations, and not the promised “printout of actually what was eliminated”, appears in any district share. The nearest published version is the proposed budget filed for the next evening’s board meeting. These are governmental records available on request; no statute requires a body to post them, which is why this is an observation.

Sources: RSA 91-A:4, I (right to inspect governmental records); Claremont FY 26 Proposed Budget (January 7 packet).

OBSERVATION Middle-school cuts approach the minimum-standards floor; no one tested them against it

Claremont Middle School was already “down one science, one social studies, one English, one math” (0:50:13); a guidance position and a PE vacancy were removed at this meeting, and the principal warned that deeper cuts could mean going “to half your science and socialism [social studies]”. Sprague raised the only compliance point: unified arts, PE and health “are all subject to minimum standards as well. At least they used to be.” The Ed 306 minimum standards for school approval were readopted effective December 13, 2024, three weeks before this meeting, and are the framework against which such cuts would be checked. No one in the meeting made that check, and this page does not assert that any standard was breached.

Source: N.H. Admin. R. Ed 306 (minimum standards for public school approval; Doc. #14150, eff. 12-13-24; no subsection asserted).

OBSERVATION Pre-K was removed as a gross $500,000 program cost; the continuing special-education cost was never quantified

The draft carried no money for the pre-K program (Henry: “That is correct”, 0:37:25), which served 23 identified children and about 20 typical peers. The committee accepted that services to identified children continue: McCosker, “one way or the other, we have to provide those services”, while cautioning “I don’t know that assuming is safe.” Sprague spent much of the second hour trying to isolate the program’s net cost and could not: the contracted-services line could not be found, and part of it “got zeroed”. The roughly $500,000 carried to the board the next evening is therefore a gross classroom-program figure; no net figure appears in any record. Federal rules make a free appropriate public education available to “all children residing in the State between the ages of 3 and 21, inclusive”, with each child’s placement decided by a group that includes the parents; they do not require a district to run its own classroom program, so no violation is suggested. Sprague also asked for a presentation on out-of-district placement protocols (“This is very foreign to me”); no date was set.

Sources: 34 CFR 300.101(a) (FAPE available to all children residing in the State between the ages of 3 and 21); 34 CFR 300.116(a)(1) (placement decided by a group including the parents).

OBSERVATION The recording starts mid-meeting, and the gallery misdates it

The recording opens mid-question; whatever preceded it, including the call to order and any roll call, is not in the record and, with no minutes, is not recoverable. It runs to the adjournment. The Cablecast gallery titles the show “School Board Finance Meeting 1/6/24”; the file names, the January 7, 2025 board meeting’s references to the finance committee’s work “yesterday”, and the FY26 figures place it on January 6, 2025. A records observation, not a legal finding.

Sources: Cablecast show 16246; Approved CSB minutes 1.7.25.

OBSERVATION The recording refers to an earlier Friday budget session that has no public record

Three remarks point to a session on the preceding Friday, January 3, 2025: Crawford, “I looked on Friday at the sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center” (0:39:42) and “On Friday. I saw $30,000” (0:41:34); Pratt, “I wasn’t here for Friday” (0:42:05) and “the last meeting we had when we were talking about pre-K” (1:13:12). On December 18 Sprague had told the board the committee would “get together as a group over the Christmas period”. No recording, notice or minutes of a Friday session was located. The record does not show whether it was a meeting of a quorum of the committee or a staff work session with members reviewing figures, so no rule is applied; if it was a committee meeting, flag 1’s analysis would apply to it as well.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d); Dialogue/16222 SchoolBoard121824.mp4.CSV (Sprague, 1:13:34).

POSITIVE The budget was worked through on camera with the principals at the table

No statute requires a subcommittee to televise a working session. This one took the FY26 draft apart line by line on camera, with the superintendent, the business administrator and five building administrators free to object, and they did: the three elementary principals rejected the proposed replacement of their student services coordinators and the committee dropped it. Crawford spoke directly to employees who might be watching (0:48:27), and the next evening told the board that the finance meetings “are all available for citizens to watch”, as the approved minutes record it. The same meeting left no written record; see flag 1.

Sources: Cablecast show 16246; Approved CSB minutes 1.7.25.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page