Claremont School Board — October 18, 2017

Summary of a regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, generated from the Claremont Community Television recording and its speaker-attributed transcript. After a late start, the board heard Sinton Street residents on school traffic, the early childhood program, and the process for filling Patrick Adrian's seat; argued over the superintendent's request to reconsider the $1.2 million reduction target set on September 30; took the fiscal year 2017 year-end report, applying $326,329 of fund balance to reduce taxes; and accepted a $13,320 foundation donation, three grants and a teacher nomination. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6 administration present)
Date
Wednesday, October 18, 2017
Start time
Not stated. The meeting began late after an earlier meeting ran over (0:00:18); the superintendent said "We are one hour into our meeting time" at 0:08:06. The recording ends at 2:38:54 during member questions, with no adjournment captured.
Location
Not stated in available records. Remarks at the table ("Why is it that we couldn't do that here at the at the tech Center?", 1:40:40; "this building", 1:40:49) indicate the board met in the Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center building.
Recording
Cablecast: SCHOOL BOARD MEETING 10-18-17 (2:38:54; ends before adjournment)
Minutes
None located online. Neither Drive share holds a year folder older than 2022, and the Meeting Minutes share starts at 2023 (MAP.md section 44, checked 9/26/26). The November 1, 2017 recording shows these minutes approved that night.
Board composition
Seven seats; Patrick Adrian's seat vacant after his resignation (0:56:42). All six sitting members answered the roll (0:00:48, 0:00:52): Rapp (chair), Irish (vice chair), Petrin, Pierce, Sprague and Zullo.

Participants

Everyone the recording shows taking part, as named in the project's dialogue file. Where the dialogue file leaves a voice Unidentified, this page does too.
NameRoleParticipation
Brian RappChairPresided; said he had raised the Sinton Street traffic issue with the police chief (0:11:51); said the September 30 target read as "a directive" (1:13:06) and that a motion to reconsider could be made (1:08:46); called the crisis framing "an opinion" (1:25:55).
Chris IrishVice chairArgued the September 30 motion could not be reconsidered (1:07:55); asked when the regional tech center agreement ends (1:49:06); moved to accept the grants (2:25:17) and seconded the policies (2:27:10).
Michelle PierceMemberAnnounced Christmas in Claremont (0:18:36); raised adult bullying (0:51:16); seconded the lead policy (1:01:32) and the fund balance motion (2:06:08); moved to accept the donation (2:12:44) and to move five policies to second reading (2:27:00).
Frank SpragueMemberMoved the lead policy rewrite (1:01:24, 1:03:10); "Claremont's insolvent" (1:17:07); moved the fund balance use (2:05:57); seconded the donation (2:12:58); questioned student conduct policy wording (2:27:16).
Michael PetrinMemberMoved the October 4 minutes (0:03:23); described the September 30 figure as "a lofty goal" (1:12:02); moved the teacher nomination (2:26:07).
Rebecca ZulloMemberAsked for administrative staffing counts going back five years (1:33:04) and for a breakdown of per-pupil cost (2:33:39).
Middleton McGoodwinSuperintendent, SAU 6Deferred his report (0:08:06); set out the vacancy process (0:56:42); asked the board to reconsider the September 30 target (1:04:00); reported a Newport superintendent's question about the tech center (1:45:46).
Michael O'NeillBusiness administrator, SAU 6Presented the fiscal year 2017 year-end report and tax rate projection (0:01:59, 1:53:07 to 2:11:27). The dialogue file names him from the roster; the superintendent's references are transcribed as "Michael Niklas".
Cory LeClairAssistant Superintendent, SAU 6Presented three grants (2:13:33 to 2:25:09); explained average daily membership (2:35:41).
Dr. Diane EdwardsDirector, early childhood programPresented the program (0:25:35 to 0:39:50): three classrooms, 52 children and a wait list (0:43:44).
Chris (surname not on record)Director of special education (inferred)Opened the early childhood presentation (0:20:16); spoke on out-of-district programs (1:39:46) and the student conduct policy (2:30:51).
Josh Malloy (uncertain)Director of technologyExplained average daily membership (2:35:07). Attribution is a single-cue hypothesis in the attribution report.
LexiStudent representativeStudent report (0:03:39); corrected the grammar of the lead policy (1:02:35, 1:02:43).
Unidentified residents (names not on the recording)Citizens' comments, Sinton Street and Canterbury StreetAsked for action on speeding and blocked driveways at school drop-off (0:08:49 to 0:16:51). Irish asked whether the clerk had their names (0:17:05); the names are not audible.

Order of business (reconstructed)

No agenda for this meeting is posted online, though the board works from one and amends it at the table. This outline is reconstructed from the chair's transitions. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for the full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:12Call to order; pledge; roll callChair Rapp; late start; six members present (0:00:48, 0:00:52).
0:00:58AgendaAmended at the superintendent's request to add acceptance of a donation, three grants and a nomination, and to change a budget bullet (0:01:05 to 0:01:20); the business administrator added the year-end report (0:01:59). Approved as amended, voice vote (0:02:57).
0:02:57Minutes of October 4, 2017Approved; motion Petrin (0:03:23), voice vote (0:03:27).
0:03:39Student representative's reportLexi.
0:08:03Superintendent's reportDeferred for time (0:08:06).
0:08:22Citizens' commentsResidents on school traffic; Pierce on Christmas in Claremont; closed at 0:19:24.
0:19:38Discussion: school district early childhood programPresentation. No vote.
0:47:59Discussion: school district community conversationUpdate on survey responses and a diversity consultant. No vote.
0:56:40Discussion: school board vacancyProcess for filling Patrick Adrian's term to March 2018. No action on the resignation (0:59:08).
1:00:32Action: lead screening policyRewrite moved by Sprague, second Pierce (1:01:24, 1:01:32); amended for grammar; approved as amended, voice vote (1:03:10 to 1:03:18).
1:03:42Consideration of the September 30 fiscal year 2019 budget study sessionSuperintendent asked for reconsideration of the reduction target; no motion made; the superintendent closed the item (1:23:49).
1:30:00Fiscal year 2019 budget discussionBoard requests for information; the superintendent to report November 1 (1:52:31). No vote.
1:53:07Year-end report (added at the table)Motion Sprague to use $326,329 of fund balance to reduce taxes and retain $197,765, second Pierce, voice vote (2:05:57 to 2:06:17); signatures requested (2:11:27).
2:12:04Acceptance of donation (added)$13,320 from the Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation for the early childhood sensory room (2:12:19); motion Pierce, second Sprague, voice vote (2:12:44 to 2:13:04).
2:13:11Acceptance of three grants (added)Intel mathematics professional learning grant (Title II; "I believe our award is for $100,000", 2:17:29) and two robotics grants of $1,250 and $2,250 (2:21:03, 2:21:30); motion Irish, second, voice vote (2:25:17 to 2:25:31).
2:25:38Nomination (added)A Title I teacher, replacing a teacher who moved to a classroom position (2:25:39, 2:25:50); motion Petrin, voice vote (2:26:07 to 2:26:15).
2:26:23Policies: behavior and conductFive policies (one new, four revised) moved to second reading, motion Pierce, second Irish (2:27:00, 2:27:10), with student conduct wording to be revised; voice vote (2:33:25).
2:33:39Member questionsPer-pupil cost questions. The recording ends at 2:38:54 without an adjournment.

Discussion timeline

Chronological, from the dialogue CSV. Times are the start of the cited exchange, taken from the CSV's own second count. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped cell for the full entry.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:05Items added to the agendaMcGoodwin: "I'd like to add on the action items, except acceptance of a donation." "Acceptance of three grants." (0:01:15); O'Neill: "I got a year end report so that we can set the tax rate that I finished today, that I'd like to get approved." (0:01:59).HIGH MEDIUM
0:08:49Citizens' comments: school traffic"we're from Sinton Street, the street that, drivers have to go down to, to pick up their children and drop them off." Rapp had raised it with the police chief (0:11:51); McGoodwin: "I will contact chief Chase tomorrow." (0:13:13). Irish: "Did you get the names for Mary?" (0:17:05).POSITIVE
0:20:16Early childhood programExpanded days and hours, transport "now offered for all" (0:28:05); a sensory room paid for by a grant (0:35:44); "right now we have, 52 children" and "a wait list of five" (0:43:44).
0:48:03Community conversation"almost 70 responses" to the October 13 letter; a consultant with "25 years of experience dealing with the issues of diversity and race" (0:48:33). Rapp reported contact with Mothers United for Social Change (0:49:55); a presentation on how bullying is handled was requested for the next meeting (0:53:47).
0:56:42Vacancy processAdrian's term "ends in March of 2018"; parents contacted, notice "going out to the media" (0:58:06); candidates to "introduce themselves and to have a dialog with you" before a nonpublic session (0:57:14). Rapp: the appointee "would serve until the next election, which would be in March" (0:58:35).POSITIVE
1:00:38Lead screening policyThe draft carries an opt-out: parents "may choose to opt out from the requirement of submitting documentation that their child has been tested for lead blood or blood lead level." McGoodwin: "For the record, the superintendent has been corrected by a senior" (1:02:43).
1:04:00Request to reconsider the September 30 targetMcGoodwin: "I wanted to bring this forward again for reconsideration." "if we come into this budget, wishing it to be a million plus below this year's budget" (1:05:25). Rapp: "I don't think there's 1.2 million without major staffing cuts." (1:07:11).OBSERVATION
1:07:55Reconsideration disputeIrish: "We can't reconsider that motion. There's no legal process that we can take to open it back up again. Too much time has passed." Rapp: "Even if somebody wanted to make a motion to reconsider, they could." (1:08:46); "Nobody has made any motion." (1:09:16); Irish: "Would you like me to read? Robert says about this, you know you're wrong, Brian." (1:09:35).OBSERVATION
1:12:02Goal or directivePetrin: "that September 30th meeting, we came up with a goal and a number to go with that goal." Rapp: "what came across was a directive" (1:13:06). Sprague: "Claremont's insolvent. That's where we are." (1:17:07).OBSERVATION
1:21:02Grants and supplantingO'Neill: "It's difficult to write grants to lower the budget because that's supplanting."
1:25:14Crisis framingIrish: "Our job is to make that hard financial decision in the crisis that we are, it's not yours." Rapp: "That's an opinion, by the way." (1:25:55).
1:30:03Budget information requestsZullo: increases in administrative positions over five years (1:33:04); Pierce: transportation and special education out-of-district ratios (1:34:48). High school: "55 classes that have 13 or less" (1:43:11).
1:45:46Regional tech centerA rumor, relayed by the Newport superintendent, that the Claremont center was closing: "I said, that's not correct." The agreement ends in 2022 (1:49:12); Irish: "the board chairs don't have the authority to move on that without a vote of us anyway." (1:49:13).
1:52:31Year-end report moved upMcGoodwin: "Could we move the 025 and miss 25 into the action item now that you now have it in front of you?"HIGH
1:53:52Fund balanceO'Neill: "last year the board made a motion and to hold over $388,714 a fund balance. Ever since 2012, we're allowed to carry over some money." Total available "524 00094" (1:54:41).OBSERVATION
1:56:57Catastrophic aid"the amount of the catastrophic aid that we are entitled to this year in Claremont is $400,000. They're going to pay us 280." Later "the reduced amount of 277,500" (2:00:01) and "they figured at the 70% and then they reduce it to 66% of the 70%" (2:00:28). Projected tax rate impact $0.36 (1:59:15).OBSERVATION
2:04:25Fund balance decisionO'Neill: "the first year I was here, we returned $1.8 million" and the taxes went up the next year (2:04:47). Sprague moved to "Use the 326329 to reduce taxes and retain. 197765 in the fund balance." (2:05:57); Pierce seconded; voice vote (2:06:16).OBSERVATION
2:09:33Cost per pupilIrish: "our average cost per student is 16,842. What is the state belief that an adequate education cost a student in New Hampshire?" O'Neill: "3000 $603,980." (2:09:45).
2:11:27SignaturesO'Neill: "The only other thing I need is to have two of these signed by people on the board chair and the superintendent".HIGH
2:12:19Byrne Foundation donation"The Jack Dorothy Byrne Foundation for the sensory. Room at the Early Childhood program. A donation of $13,320." Accepted on motion (2:12:44 to 2:13:04).MEDIUM
2:13:33Three grantsIntel mathematics grant "through title two funds and the Department of Education" (2:17:11), "I believe our award is for $100,000." (2:17:29); robotics grants "$1,250 for the elementary team" (2:21:03) and "a total of 2250" (2:21:30). Accepted on motion (2:25:17 to 2:25:31).MEDIUM
2:25:39Teacher nominationSuperintendent's nomination of a Title I teacher; LeClair: the departing teacher "moved from a title and position to a classroom position" (2:25:50); accepted on Petrin's motion (2:26:07).POSITIVE
2:27:16Student conduct policySprague questioned "an informal evaluation of the student's placement" after a suspension (2:28:09); McGoodwin: "I will change it to a reentry meeting for the student." (2:29:27).
2:35:41Average daily membershipLeClair: "I think we have 1801 students right now" but the cost figure divides by average daily membership (2:35:59).

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the meeting against the law in force on October 18, 2017. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag names the rule it rests on; where no verified rule applies, it is recorded as an observation. Ordered by severity.

HIGH The fiscal year 2017 year-end financial report was finished on October 18, nearly seven weeks after the statutory September 1 filing date

The business administrator asked to add "a year end report so that we can set the tax rate that I finished today" (0:01:59); the superintendent later asked to move "the 025 and miss 25" (the DOE-25 and MS-25 annual reports, as transcribed) into the action items (1:52:31); the business administrator updated the estimated revenues in the same presentation (1:56:15) and asked for signatures from the chair and the superintendent (2:11:27). The law then in force required school districts to file their financial report, receipts and expenditures for the preceding fiscal year with a balance sheet, "on or before September 1 of each year", and to file the report revising estimated revenues "by September 1 of each year". On the recording, the report for the year ended June 30, 2017 was completed 47 days after that date. HIGH under the severity rule for a missed statutory deadline, because the lapse appears on the recording itself in the business administrator's own words. The other reading should be stated: an earlier version may have been filed on time and tonight's document be a revision for tax-rate setting. Nothing on the recording says so, and the business administrator's request tonight for the chair's and superintendent's signatures on the report points the other way; the filing record is not online. Paragraph V, unlike paragraph I of the same section, provides no extension of its date.

Sources: RSA 21-J:34, III and V (2017 codification; source note ends 2007, 182:2, eff. April 1, 2007): revised estimated revenues "shall be filed by September 1 of each year"; "School districts shall submit financial reports on or before September 1 of each year."

MEDIUM A $13,320 donation and a grant stated at $100,000 were accepted with no public hearing on the record, after being added to the agenda at the table

At the start the superintendent added "acceptance of a donation" and "Acceptance of three grants" to the agenda (0:01:05, 0:01:15). Late in the meeting the board accepted a $13,320 donation from the Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation (2:12:19 to 2:13:04) and three grants, one stated as "I believe our award is for $100,000" and two of $1,250 and $2,250 (2:17:29 to 2:25:31). The law then in force, for a district that has adopted the enabling article, required that "For unanticipated funds in the amount of $5,000 or more, the school board shall hold a prior public hearing on the action to be taken", with newspaper notice at least seven days ahead, and for smaller amounts that the board "shall post notice of the funds in the agenda and shall include notice in the minutes". No hearing is opened on this recording, and the two small grants reached the agenda only by amendment at the table. Mitigating points: the meeting began late because an earlier meeting ran over (0:00:18), and what that meeting was is not stated; whether the district had adopted the enabling article, and whether the Title II money counted as unanticipated, cannot be checked from here. A year later the same board did hold a donations hearing before acceptance and held two small grants over because they had not been warned on the agenda (see the November 7, 2018 page). MEDIUM: a probable process gap under a binding rule.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, I and III(a)-(b) (2017 codification; source note ends 2005, 188:1, eff. Aug. 29, 2005; the threshold rose to $20,000 only in 2023).

OBSERVATION The September 30 budget study session that set the $1.2 million target has no public record online, and neither does this meeting

An agenda item tonight was "Consideration of the September 30th School board fiscal year 19 budget study session" (1:03:42); members describe a motion made there (1:07:55) and a goal "and a number to go with that goal" (1:12:02); Pierce said she followed it from "the notes" (1:11:13). That Saturday session has no recording in the corpus, no MAP.md section and no minutes online; this meeting's minutes and packet (the green annual report sheet, the saturation study, the year-end report) are not online either. The district's Drive shares begin in 2022 and 2023, so this is a finding about online availability, not evidence that records were never kept. A session of a quorum of the board is subject to notice and to minutes open for inspection within five business days.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification; source note ends 2016, 29:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2017, so the text in force throughout 2017): notice "of the time and place of each such meeting"; minutes "open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting".

OBSERVATION Chair and vice chair disagreed on the record over whether the September 30 motion could be reconsidered; no motion was made

The vice chair said "There's no legal process that we can take to open it back up again" (1:07:55) and offered to read from Robert's Rules (1:09:35); the chair replied that a motion to reconsider could be made (1:08:46) and told him "You need to you need to be quiet." (1:09:12). No motion was made, and the superintendent closed the item without a vote (1:23:49). No statute verified for this page governs reconsideration of a school board motion, and the board's own rules of procedure for the period are not available, so neither position can be checked here. Recorded because the exchange shows the board without an agreed procedure on a question that decided the budget process.

Sources: No verified rule; recorded as an observation.

OBSERVATION Catastrophic special education aid was described as 70% of costs above the threshold; the statute said 80 percent, with proration allowed

The business administrator said the district's entitlement was about $400,000 and the State would pay about $277,500 to $280,000 (1:56:57, 2:00:01), and described the formula as "they figured at the 70% and then they reduce it to 66% of the 70%" (2:00:28). The section as it read both before and after its July 1, 2017 amendment made the State liable for 80 percent of costs above 3 1/2 times the state average expenditure per pupil, and 100 percent above 10 times, and directed that if the appropriation fell short it "shall be prorated proportionally based on entitlement". So the reduced payment he described is what the statute provided for, not a State failure; the 70% figure does not match the text. There was no floor on the proration in 2017 (the 80% floor on entitlement dates from 2025).

Sources: RSA 186-C:18, III (2017 codification; source note 2017, 156:96-100, eff. July 1, 2017); RSA 186-C:18, III (2016 codification; source note ends 2011, 224:227): same 80 percent and proration language.

OBSERVATION Fund balance was retained and applied by board motion; the statutory cap cannot be checked from the record

The board voted to apply $326,329 to reduce taxes and retain $197,765 (2:05:57 to 2:06:17), after the business administrator explained that "Ever since 2012, we're allowed to carry over some money" (1:53:52). The law then in force allowed the legislative body to authorize a district to retain year-end unassigned general funds "in an amount not to exceed, in any fiscal year, 2.5 percent of the current fiscal year's net assessment", for emergency expenditures and overexpenditures or to reduce the tax rate. The decision was taken openly by motion, which is to the board's credit. The recording does not state the authorizing warrant article or the net assessment, so whether the amounts retained this year and in earlier years (including a first-year $650,000, 1:54:15) fell within the cap cannot be checked here.

Sources: RSA 198:4-b, II (2019 codification; source note ends 2014, 190:6, so this text governed until the 2020 amendment raised the cap to 5 percent).

POSITIVE The vacancy was advertised publicly, with candidates to be heard at the next meeting and the term stated

The superintendent reported that parents had been contacted, the notice was "going out to the media", and candidates would appear before the board on November 1 before it chose (0:56:42 to 0:58:06); the chair confirmed the appointee would serve only until the March election (0:58:35). The law then in force directed the school board to fill its own vacancies, with appointees serving "until the next district election". The November 1 page shows the process carried out.

Sources: RSA 671:33, II(a) (2017 codification; source note ends 2017, 3:2, eff. May 30, 2017).

POSITIVE Residents' traffic complaint was heard at length and answered with a named follow-up; the vice chair asked that their names be taken

Sinton Street residents spoke for about eight minutes with questions from members (0:08:49 to 0:16:51). The superintendent committed to call the police chief the next morning and asked for specifics by email (0:16:19), and the vice chair asked "Did you get the names for Mary?" (0:17:05), the clerk. The law then in force required minutes to include "persons appearing before the public bodies". The names are not audible on the recording, so the page leaves the speakers unidentified.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2016 codification): minutes "shall include the names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, and a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions".

POSITIVE A teacher hire was nominated by the superintendent and elected by the board in public session

The superintendent put the nomination of a Title I teacher before the board, the assistant superintendent explained the vacancy, and the board accepted it on a motion (2:25:39 to 2:26:15). That is the statutory division of labor: the superintendent nominates, the board elects.

Sources: RSA 189:39 (source note ends 1971, 371:2; unamended across the corpus): "Superintendents shall nominate and school boards elect all teachers".

Appendix: source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page