Claremont School Board, School Board Vacancy Discussion — November 5, 2025

One agenda item, published by CCTV as its own show. A six-member board that had tied three to three over two applicants on October 1 filled its vacant seventh seat by reinstating the member who had resigned it: two more three-to-three deadlocks, then a reinstatement carried three votes to two with one abstention, after six residents, including both applicants, had spoken. Built from the excerpt’s dialogue transcript, the draft minutes, the unsealed nonpublic minutes, the posted agenda and both copies of the board’s by-laws. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6), regular meeting of November 5, 2025: agenda item III.6, “Vacant School Board Seat (Discussion, Vote or Consensus)”.
Date
Wednesday, November 5, 2025
What this recording is
An excerpt, not a separate meeting. Show 16958 carries the vacancy item from the full meeting recording, show 16951, beginning about 7,769 seconds into it (MAP.md section 102). Its first line, at 0:00:00, is the chair’s opening sentence from the call to order, spliced ahead of the item (see flag 6). Every timestamp on this page is on this excerpt’s own clock.
When on the night
About 9:12 p.m. to 10:02 p.m., derived rather than recorded: the draft minutes give 7:35 p.m. and 8:08 p.m. for the nonpublic session, which fixes the parent recording’s start at about 6:31 p.m. and its gap at about 32 minutes. The agenda set adjournment for 8:30 p.m. The minutes record no start or end time (see flag 3).
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the agenda and the draft minutes
Board composition
Six sitting members and one vacancy at the start of this item; seven at the end. Whitney (chair), Petrin (vice chair), Hawkins, Crawford, Madden, Howard. The seat had been vacant since Frank Sprague resigned it. By-law 2.01 sets a quorum of “(4 of 7)”; six were present.
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board - School Board Vacancy Discussion - 11/5/25 (dialogue file ends at 0:49:28; 271 rows, thirteen speakers, none labeled Unidentified). The full meeting is covered on the November 5, 2025 meeting page.
Minutes
Draft: 11.5.25 DRAFT CSB Meeting Minutes, “Respectfully submitted by Noelle Kronberg, school board clerk”. They record every member’s vote on all three motions by name. Approved as amended on December 3, 2025; no approved copy was located.
Nonpublic session
One that evening, under RSA 91-A:3, II(k), about ninety minutes before this item; its unsealed minutes concern tuition rates and do not mention the vacancy. Discussed on the meeting page, flag 2.

Participants

Everyone who speaks in this excerpt. Board roles follow the agenda; residents are identified from their own announcements, corroborated by the draft minutes. Where the dialogue file and the district spell a name differently, both are given.
NameRoleParticipation on this item
Heather WhitneyBoard chairPresided; read counsel’s advice and Frank Sprague’s letter into the record; disclosed, when asked, that she had telephoned Sprague; argued for deference to the voters; seconded both reinstatement motions; voted against appointing Lavalette and for reinstatement; ruled that an abstention is a non-vote. 103 of 271 rows.
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; Policy Subcommittee chairOpposed reinstatement on process and precedent; seconded the motion to appoint Lavalette; read the by-law on abstentions, then the NHSBA recommendation at a resident’s request. Voted against reinstatement.
Loren HowardBoard memberCalled reopening “a time waster”; moved to appoint Lavalette; seconded the reopening motion; abstained on reinstatement, which carried it.
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance Subcommittee chairAsked whether Sprague had volunteered; argued for leaving the seat empty until March; moved to reopen applications; pressed for the pending motion to be disposed of; voted against reinstatement.
Michael PetrinVice chairMoved reinstatement twice, the first time deferred without a vote; conceded there is no set process for filling a vacancy. Rendered “Mr. Peter” in the transcript.
William “Bill” MaddenBoard memberSaid people told him it looks like “a back room, cigar filled smoke”; voted for reinstatement.
Frank SpragueFormer member; reinstated at this itemDoes not speak and is not recorded present. His request reached the board as a letter, read aloud by the chair.
Don LavaletteWard 2 resident; applicantCorrected the chair’s statement that no one had asked to return to office; told the board to choose between the two applicants or leave the seat empty. The draft minutes spell him “Lavallette”; the approved December 3 minutes “Lavalette”. The transcript also renders him “Lavallée”, “Mr. Lava”, “Mr. Laval” and “Mr. Lobos”.
Kevin TysonApplicantSpoke on his volunteering and the mission of EdOpt, his employer. Kevin Tyson maintains this project; see the footer.
Matt BeanWard 1 residentSpoke against reinstatement and for Lavalette; the minutes add “against Mr. Tyson due to his involvement in EdOpt”. Cut off by the time limit. Rendered “Matt Beam”.
Camron LownieWard 2 residentSpoke against reinstatement; after the vote asked that the next sentence of the by-law be read. Announced as “Cameron Louny” in the transcript; the draft minutes spell “Cameron Lowney”.
Sherry WilliamsWard 1 residentAsked the board to set politics aside and choose between the two applicants.
John CloutierState representative; Ward 1Introduced the Claremont House delegation; did not address the seat.
Matt AngellInterim Business Administrator, SAU 6One row: calls time on a speaker, 15 seconds.

James O’Shaughnessy, district counsel, wrote the advice the chair reads; he was in the building earlier (the nonpublic minutes list him present) but does not speak on this item. The interim superintendent does not speak on it.

Agenda

The posted agenda, CSB Agenda 11.5.25.pdf, runs from a 6:30 p.m. call to order to an 8:30 p.m. adjournment. This recording covers one item; the rest is on the meeting page.

The posted agenda in outline, marking the one item in this recording.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
Not in this recordingI–II. Call to order; roll call; consent agenda; citizens’ comments; reports; follow-up itemsMinutes: “Roll call taken by Matt Angell, all present”. Eight residents spoke at citizens’ comments, two of them on the vacancy process. The chair’s opening sentence is the one spliced onto the front of this excerpt.
Not in this recordingIII.1–5 Nonpublic session (II(k)); alternative programs; Program of Studies; Masonic Temple and Bluff School; search committeeNonpublic 7:35 to 8:08 p.m. on tuition rates, no vote; item 2 struck; Program of Studies not ready; property data by consent; Madden and Petrin to the search committee.
0:00:04III.6 Vacant School Board Seat“(Discussion, Vote or Consensus)”. Per the draft minutes: Petrin moved reinstatement, Whitney seconded, “Motion deferred”; Howard moved to appoint Don Lavallette, Hawkins seconded, 3–3, “The motion does not pass”; Crawford moved to open the position to the public again, Howard seconded, 3–3, “The motion does not pass”; Petrin moved reinstatement, Whitney seconded, for Madden, Petrin, Whitney, against Crawford, Hawkins, “Abstaining: Loren Howard”, “The motion passed, Frank Sprague will be reinstated as the seventh Board member”.
Not in this recordingIII.7 SchoolCare; subcommittee reports; IV. Other business; VI. AdjournmentPolicy votes, SchoolCare premiums, future dates. Adjourned at about 10:21 p.m., not 8:30.

Discussion timeline

The whole item in order. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording, on this excerpt’s clock; add about 7,769 seconds for the same moment on show 16951. Quotations are from this excerpt’s own dialogue file, which is a separate transcription from show 16951’s and differs from it in places.

TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:00A spliced opening line“I have no gavel, so I'm going to use my knocker today.” This is the first sentence of the whole meeting, at second 0 of show 16951; the dialogue file’s role column records it as a cold open spliced ahead of the vacancy item.OBSERVATION
0:00:04The item opens“Next, the vacant school board seat. Two meetings ago we had a failed vacancy appointment.” The chair says she sent counsel’s correspondence to the board: “I sent the emails, correspondence that was shared between myself and. And his cell and him with the with the board.”MEDIUM
0:00:35Counsel’s advice, read into the record“he said the lorry [law] directs the board to fill the vacancy and he provided the RSA, which is RSA 671 colon 331 [671:33]. It states that the school board shall feel [fill] vacancies occurring on the school board. The law also empowers the selectmen on the town to appoint, whenever the remaining members are unable, by a majority vote, to agree upon and point de [an appointment].” A close paraphrase of RSA 671:33, II(a).MEDIUM
0:01:07Fill it now, or the city council may“If the board does not feel the fill the vacancy at its next meeting, there is a risk that the City Council votes to fill it.” At 0:01:28: “There are more than five months until the election in March, and that is too long to leave the post vacant. He also said that the law that he cited is not a controlling law.” November 5, 2025 to the March 10, 2026 election is 125 days, about four months; whether the error is counsel’s, the reading’s or the transcriber’s cannot be told, because the advice was not published.MEDIUM
0:01:47How the letter arrived, first version“Over the weekend, Mr. Sprague and I had a conversation, and he submitted a letter to the board, which I forwarded out to the board”.OBSERVATION
0:02:16Frank Sprague’s letter“I am writing to formally request reinstatement to the Claremont School Board.” At 0:03:01: “While the circumstances that led to my departure are complex, I have taken time to reflect and I feel I have much to offer in the remainder of my elected term, and perhaps beyond.” At 0:03:29: “I am not interested in a competitive process, as I have been chosen overwhelmingly by my constituents in multiple city elections”. The letter is in no packet.MEDIUM
0:04:20First reinstatement motion, then set asidePetrin: “So I would make a motion to reinstate Frank Sprague, to the Claremont School Board.” At 0:04:32, in a segment the dialogue file marks as merged with Hawkins: “I'm all second. Am I going to open discussion because the motion fails?” The minutes: “Motion deferred”. No vote to defer.MEDIUM
0:04:42Hawkins: the board is circumventing its own process“We are circumventing our own process.” At 0:05:08: “I'm asking that we reopen the process and allow other people who might be interested to also have the opportunity to be appointed.”
0:05:31Howard: vote tonight“I think opening it up at this point feels a little bit like of a time waster.” At 0:05:51: “And if we get a seven person, that's great. Or if it goes to the city, that's great.”
0:06:29Madden: how it looks“people have spoken to me and they intimated that it looks like a back room, cigar filled smoke.”
0:07:32The chair: defer to the voters“My my support of Mr. Sprague was simply because he's elected.” At 0:11:12: “I would say this even if I had unbelievable disagreements with this individual to defer to the voters because I find this appointment process a dirty process.”
0:08:55No policy on vacanciesWhitney: “We unfortunately, we have never had a policy related to this. We set a process for we tried to follow the process that we used with Miss Crawford to be consistent. That process failed.”OBSERVATION
0:09:28Forty-five daysA merged segment: “I think we have 45 days from when the most believe that's for municipal purposes.” Neither RSA 671:33 nor RSA 197:26 contains any time limit; the city council’s power turns on the board’s failure to agree.MEDIUM
0:10:16Why the chair asked counsel“So that's why I consulted with our attorney and shared it with the board before this meeting.” At 0:10:45: “So everybody knew what the legal advice was or the guidance and what the risks were.”MEDIUM
0:12:13“Did Mr. Sprague volunteer?”A merged segment: Crawford’s question, then the chair: “I called Mr. Sprague personally, and I asked him, do you know of any candidate that you would think that would be appropriate to come up because we're going to be having this discussion again? He said, I can't think of anybody. And I said kind of offhandedly, would do there any chance that you would do it?” At 0:12:34: “And he said he would consider it. And then he sent me a letter.”OBSERVATION
0:12:47Crawford: leave it empty until March“I was disappointed in Mr. Sprague for resigning at the time that he did”. At 0:13:58: “we are within 90 days of somebody actually filing for the school board seat.” Filing opened January 21, 2026, 77 days later. At 0:14:44: “I would recommend that we do nothing and, and wait until the voters vote”.
0:16:14“You have a motion on the floor”Crawford: “Well, you have a motion on the floor.” The chair at 0:16:06: “I deferred that, and I was going to wait for the folks to speak”. Nothing is put to a vote.MEDIUM
0:16:32Command or guidance?Hawkins: “the statute is not you will or else it's guidance.” At 0:16:43: “it's our attorney said it is guidance.” The statute says the board “shall fill” vacancies; it provides no penalty.MEDIUM
0:17:22Hawkins on how the letter arrived“Jumping to immediately voting on the person who stepped forward, when the person was asked if they knew anybody who would be interested”. The chair at 0:18:08: “But the board has the option to say no.”
0:21:08Comment opened on the itemThe chair invites the public to speak; six residents do. This is in addition to the eight who spoke at citizens’ comments earlier.POSITIVE
0:21:35An applicant corrects the chairThe chair had said at 0:19:36 she had “yet to see any board member who was left the board for, for any reason, asked to come back”. Lavalette: “some years ago, Mr. Pope was the mayor of the city of Claremont, and he resigned his post during a meeting.” The chair at 0:21:54: “I defer. You're correct.” The city history is the speaker’s and is not verified here.POSITIVE
0:21:57“Either decide to fill it with Mr. Tyson me, or don't fill it”Lavalette: “You had a process. You went through the process. That's fine if you're deadlocked.” At 0:22:30: “So either decide to fill it with Mr. Tyson me, or don't fill it.”
0:23:03Residents objectMatt Bean: “do I just get to write a letter and say, oh, I get to come back and have this job back?” At 0:23:33: “That is very unfair to both people.” Camron Lownie at 0:28:10: “I think that deviating from the plan via a personally solicited getting someone to come back in is the wrong play.” Speakers’ characterizations.
0:29:10The other applicant speaksKevin Tyson, at 0:29:32: “Seemed like a backroom deal as it was going down, but I stuck with the process.” At 0:30:24: “We are not in the business of getting people out of schools. We are in the business of getting information to parents.” This speaker maintains this project; see the footer.
0:32:03Choose between the twoSherry Williams: “you were faced with a decision of two highly qualified individuals”. At 0:32:36: “I beg you to set aside their political leanings and your own political leanings”.
0:34:20Motion to appoint Don LavaletteHoward: “I'd like to make a motion to appoint Don to the school board.” Hawkins seconds. Howard at 0:36:03: “I think that website is less neutral than they make themselves out to be.” Hawkins at 0:37:24: “I did not see public schools in their goals”. The chair against, at 0:39:10: “being the president of the union is it is is a biased position to have come from.”
0:40:05A tie declared before the noes“All in favor of appointing Mr. Laval? Let this evening to the Claremont School Board. Raise your hands. A we have a tie.” The failure is declared at 0:41:19; Crawford at 0:41:12: “Let's close out the motion that we have on.” The opposing hands are raised at 0:41:54. Per the minutes: for Howard, Hawkins, Crawford; against Madden, Petrin, Whitney.MEDIUM
0:40:59The second applicant, never put to a vote“if somebody brought forth a motion for Mr.. For Mr. Tyson, it is clear from that vote that Mr.. Tyson would not be appointed to the board this evening, am I correct?” No motion followed.OBSERVATION
0:42:02Motion to reopen applicationsCrawford: “we need to open it to other candidates to come forward and present themselves at the next school board meeting.” Called at 0:42:36; the result is not stated on the recording. Minutes: 3–3, “The motion does not pass”.OBSERVATION
0:42:52Reinstatement moved againPetrin: “Not of any sort of backroom deal or any sort of solicitation.” At 0:43:21: “There is no set process to to assigning someone to the vacant school board seat we have. The process needs to be better in the future.” Seconded by the chair at 0:43:41.OBSERVATION
0:43:46The abstention“All in favor of reinstating Frank Spey [Sprague] to the Claremont School Board. Raise your hand.” Howard at 0:43:53: “I'm going to abstain doing that.”
0:44:04May a member abstain?The chair: “Abstentions can only really be made if you have an objection.” Hawkins, as transcribed at 0:44:15: “No member can abstain at any time.” and at 0:45:15: “A person, a member can vote to abstain at any time.” The two renderings contradict each other; both are quoted as they stand. The chair at 0:44:59: “you can use an abstention to throw a vote.”MEDIUM
0:46:03Carried three to twoThe chair: “That's what our bylaws are present and voting.” At 0:46:14: “But then you're a non vote.” Crawford at 0:46:22: “So that means that the motion passes 3 to 2.” At 0:46:31: “By me I mean dissenting. But that was the rules.” Per the minutes: for Madden, Petrin, Whitney; against Crawford, Hawkins; Howard abstaining.MEDIUM
0:47:02The by-law, read from the websiteHawkins: “a motion blah blah blah shall be adopted by a majority of the votes. No, no proxy or absentee votes shall be allowed.” and “Abstentions are counted, but have no bearing on the outcome of the vote.” The adopted by-law 2.07 gives this very case as its example: “For example: 7 members present, 2 abstain , 2 vote no, 3 vote yes the motion passes.”POSITIVE
0:47:58A resident asks for the next sentenceLownie: “The next sentence in that I law should be read.” Hawkins reads it at 0:48:41: “Abstaining in an effort to avoid public accountability for such decisions or to force a tie vote, is counter to members public duty.” Not in the draft minutes.POSITIVE MEDIUM

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule. This page carries no HIGH flag: the seat was filled in open session, with every vote recorded by name.

MEDIUM Three votes of a six-member board seated a seventh member, and the statute and the by-law may not measure a majority the same way

RSA 671:33, II(a): “The school board shall fill vacancies occurring on the school board”; appointees “shall serve until the next district election when the voters of the district shall elect a replacement for the unexpired term”; and “if the remaining members are unable, by majority vote, to agree upon an appointment, the selectmen of the town or towns involved shall appoint members by majority vote in convention.” RSA 21:28, I lets “selectmen” mean the mayor and aldermen of a city, which is how counsel’s warning about the city council reaches this board; nobody stated that on the record. RSA 671:4 fixes school boards at an odd number of members; the vacancy had left this one at six, which is why it could tie.

The reinstatement carried on three affirmative votes, two against and one abstention (0:46:22). Three is a majority of those voting; it is not a majority of the six remaining members. The board counted under by-law 2.07 of its adopted copy: “A motion, unless governed by the ⅔ vote rule in CSBL or Robert’s Rules exceptions, shall be adopted by a majority vote of members present and voting”, with rule 2.12 to the same effect. On the by-law’s own terms the arithmetic done at 0:46:22 is right. But by-law 2.15 provides that “All laws of the State of New Hampshire and all rules of the State Board of Education shall take precedence over these rules and regulations,” and whether “unable, by majority vote, to agree” measures the remaining members or those present and voting is an open question. This page does not resolve it. Two further points: the board never read the section to itself, reducing it at 0:16:32 to whether it was “guidance”; and the “45 days” mentioned at 0:09:28 appears in neither RSA 671:33 nor RSA 197:26.

Sources: RSA 671:33, II(a) (source note ends 2021, 42:1 and 91:318; text read 2026-09-25); RSA 21:28, I (2008, 183:1); RSA 671:4 (1979, 321:1); RSA 197:26; Claremont School Board By-Laws (adopted copy, Exhibit E), rules 2.07, 2.12, 2.15.

MEDIUM A seconded motion was set aside without a vote, two motions were taken over it, and the first vote’s result was declared before the negative votes

Petrin’s reinstatement motion (0:04:20) was seconded and then “deferred” with no motion to postpone or to lay on the table. By-law 2.07 (adopted copy): “Another motion cannot be raised until all other motions are settled or adjourned -only one motion must be discussed at a time. When a motion is made and seconded, it shall be considered by the Board and not otherwise.” It lists the motions receivable during debate, including “To lay on the table” and “To postpone to a certain time”. Two further motions were then moved and voted, and Crawford objected on the record (0:16:14, 0:41:12, 0:41:30). The motion that carried at 0:43:21 restated the one left pending. On the first vote the chair announced a tie on the affirmative hands alone (0:40:05) and declared the motion failed at 0:41:19; the negative hands came at 0:41:54 after two members objected. Rule 2.13 provides that “A roll call vote may be requested by any member”; none was. Mitigation: members policed the procedure on the record, and the minutes record every position by name.

Sources: Claremont School Board By-Laws (adopted copy), rules 2.07 and 2.13; draft minutes, 11/5/25; the October 1, 2025 page, where the appointment was laid on the table by a seconded, voted motion.

MEDIUM The minutes give no start or end time, and they omit the reading of the NHSBA recommendation that a resident asked for

RSA 91-A:2, II, as amended effective August 22, 2025, requires minutes to include “the start time and end time of the meeting, and name of the person who produced the minutes”. The draft names its author but records no call-to-order or adjournment time; the only clock times are the nonpublic session’s. A reader cannot learn from the minutes that this item was reached at about 9:12 p.m., forty-two minutes after the noticed adjournment. The minutes also reduce the abstention exchange to one clause, “Heather Whitney confirmed with the by-laws that a member can abstain and a motion passing is based on members who are present and voting”; on the recording it is Hawkins who reads the by-law, and the reading of the NHSBA recommendation at 0:48:41, prompted by a resident, is not recorded. Mitigation: the minutes name every mover and seconder and every vote by name, and a PDF copy reached the next packet folder on the fifth business day.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (2025, 112:1, eff. Aug. 22, 2025); draft minutes, 11/5/25; draft CSB meeting minutes 11.5.25.pdf (filed 2025-11-13).

MEDIUM The two documents the decision turned on are in no packet; the public has only the chair’s reading of them

Counsel’s written advice and Frank Sprague’s letter were both in the board’s hands before the meeting (0:00:04, 0:10:45). The packet folder holds one document, the agenda. The draft minutes summarize the advice in two sentences and the letter in one. The board’s adopted by-laws point toward publication: rule 2.09 has the superintendent and chair “itemize any and all items to be presented in the agenda to ensure members of the public and board are aware, in advance, of any items that may require or result in board action,” and rule 4.03(d) delegates the duty to “Post online any and all agenda materials not-exempt from public dissemination by RSA 91-A”. The two documents differ. Counsel’s advice is exempt under RSA 91-A:5, XII, and nothing suggests the privilege was waived by summarizing it. The letter is correspondence to the board about an agenda item, and no exemption obviously reaches it. The one checkable claim in the advice as read, “more than five months until the election in March”, is wrong by about a month. Mitigation: the chair read both documents aloud in open session before any vote, so residents spoke to their contents.

Sources: Packet folder 11. CSB 11.5.25 (one document); Claremont School Board By-Laws (adopted copy), rules 2.09 and 4.03(d) (two rules in that copy are numbered 2.09; the text is relied on, not the number); RSA 91-A:5, XII (2022, 122:3); RSA 91-A:4, I.

OBSERVATION The chair invited the appointee to apply in a private telephone call, and said so when a member asked

The chair first introduced the letter at 0:01:47 as following a conversation after which Sprague “submitted a letter”. Asked by Crawford whether he had volunteered, she said at 0:12:13 that she had called him, asked whether he knew of a candidate, and then asked “would do there any chance that you would do it?”. No rule this project can identify is broken by that. A one-to-one call with a non-member is not a meeting under RSA 91-A:2, I, and RSA 91-A:2-a, II, which bars communications outside a meeting used to circumvent the chapter, is not engaged on this record: the advice and the letter were read in open session and every member stated a position in the room. It is recorded because every resident who spoke responded to it, and because neither the board’s acknowledgment that it has no vacancy policy (0:08:55) nor Petrin’s at 0:43:21 that “The process needs to be better in the future” led to a motion or referral on this recording.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, I; RSA 91-A:2-a, II (2008, 303:4); draft minutes, 11/5/25.

OBSERVATION The excerpt is spliced, one vote’s result is not on it, one applicant was never voted on, and the by-law exists in two texts

The splice. The line at 0:00:00 is the first sentence of the meeting, at second 0 of show 16951, placed ahead of an item reached some two hours later. The dialogue file records the join. Per the show record as read on 2026-08-29 (not re-read this run), show 16958 was created on November 6, 2025 at 2:27 p.m., the afternoon after the meeting. A missing result. The reopening motion is called at 0:42:36 and the recording never states the outcome; only the minutes carry it. An applicant not voted on. The chair reasoned at 0:40:59 that a motion for Tyson would fail; Hawkins asked at 0:41:26 why not make one anyway; none was made. Two by-law texts. The live Google Docs copy of rule 2.07 omits “or Robert’s Rules exceptions” and adds: “The NHSBA recommends voting ‘No’ if members do not have enough knowledge or resources to support a motion rather than abstain.” That copy was last modified March 23, 2026, so which text Hawkins had open cannot be established. This page quotes the adopted copy.

Sources: Cablecast show 16951 (the parent recording); By-Laws, adopted copy; By-Laws, live Google Docs copy (read 2026-09-25); draft minutes, 11/5/25.

POSITIVE A contested appointment was made entirely in open session, with comment on the item, every vote recorded by name, and the board’s own rule read aloud at a resident’s request

No part of the vacancy went into nonpublic session: the one closed session of the evening was under RSA 91-A:3, II(k), and its unsealed minutes concern tuition rates. The item fills this recording in open session; both applicants spoke; each member stated a position; and the minutes record the mover, the seconder and each member’s vote on all three motions. The chair opened comment on the item itself at 0:21:08, after eight residents had already spoken at citizens’ comments, as policy BEDH contemplates in calling for comment at “all Board meetings” and a “vocal invitation to the audience”. The chair accepted a factual correction from the floor within seconds (0:21:54). And after an abstention had decided the vote, a resident asked that the next sentence of the by-law be read, and Hawkins read it (0:48:41).

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(k); RSA 91-A:2, II (mover and seconder, 2018, 244:1); RSA 189:74 (school board public comment, 2022, 333:1); Policy BEDH, linked from the agenda; 11.5.25 CSB nonpublic minutes unsealed.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page