Claremont School Board — June 3, 2025

Regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, built from the CCTV recording, the dialogue transcript, the posted agenda and packet, and the approved minutes. About fifty minutes on grade 3–8 NH SAS, iReady and grade 11 SAT results read from slides that are not in the public packet, a superintendent’s report on instructional coaches and social workers, and six policy actions, five of them adoptions at a first reading and one of them (ADC) on no posted agenda. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Chair: Heather Whitney; vice chair: Michael Petrin.
Date
Tuesday, June 3, 2025 (moved off the usual Wednesday to avoid Stevens High School class night, as announced May 21)
Start time
6:30 p.m. per the agenda. The recording joins during the roll call; the first rows are fragments (0:00:06, 0:00:09) and the chair’s first full line is at 0:00:17. The chair adjourned at 1:59:56; minutes: “Consent adjournment at 8:30pm”. The recording runs 2:00:02.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the agenda and minutes (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8)
Board composition
Seven members; five present. Minutes: “Present: Arlene Hawkins, Loren Howard, William Madden, Michael Petrin, Heather Whitney”; “Absent: Candace Crawford, Frank Sprague”. Every vote was taken by the five present.
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 6/3/25 (2:00:02; begins mid-roll-call, so the call to order and Pledge are not captured)
Minutes
25. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 6.3.25 (uploaded June 20, 2025). The draft, 6.3.25 DRAFT CSB Meeting Minutes.pdf, was filed in the June 18 packet folder on June 16, 2025; see flag 7.

Participants

Everyone heard or recorded as present. Attendance follows the approved minutes, because the recording misses most of the roll. Names follow the agenda and minutes; where the dialogue file labels a person differently, the label is noted. No member of the public spoke.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyBoard chairPresided (173 rows, about a dozen of them Hawkins’s speech merged into her cluster). Asked about school-by-school differences and test preparation (0:29:52); moved GBEF, JICK, IHBA and ADC and the motion sending CHCA to a second read (minutes); gave the Finance Subcommittee report in Sprague’s absence.
Michael PetrinVice chair; Capital Improvement Subcommittee chairPressed for required professional development for teachers whose students struggle (0:11:21–0:11:46); cautioned that one member cannot speak for the board (1:24:40); seconded the CHCA motion (1:47:05); named the board’s representative to the Superintendent’s Advisory Committee (1:29:13). The transcript renders him “Mr. patron” and “Mr. Peter”.
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; Policy Subcommittee chair; curriculum representativePresented the six policy items (1:33:16 onward); moved JICL (1:36:55); caught the wrong CHCA version in the packet (1:40:50); asked about teacher leaders at the elementary level and about summer professional development.
William “Bill” MaddenBoard memberSaid the state average was charted like a ceiling (0:18:04); proposed making test opt-outs harder (0:19:21); seconded GBEF, JICK, IHBA and ADC (minutes); asked to apply the honor-roll process before graduation (1:57:48).
Loren HowardBoard memberLed the public-forum item (1:13:29); cautioned against pointing at individual teachers (0:40:17); seconded JICL (1:37:02); read the CHCA revision wording into the record (1:42:58–1:43:40).
Candace CrawfordBoard member; SRVRTC Subcommittee chairAbsent (minutes). Her subcommittee’s vision and purpose statement (Exhibit I) was in the packet.
Frank SpragueBoard member; Finance Subcommittee chairAbsent (minutes). The chair gave his subcommittee’s report.
Noelle KronbergSchool board clerkSigned the approved minutes; no rows attributed.
Miles Sheehan; Lilly ClarkStudent board membersListed on the masthead; no remarks attributed; attendance not recorded.
Christopher PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Presented the agenda item “Program Effectiveness & Impact on the Budget” (0:51:14 onward): coaches moving to the elementary schools, social workers, classroom management as the professional-development focus. Answered on the teacher-evaluation tool (0:32:51) and the honor roll (1:58:54).
Michael KoskiAssistant superintendentPresented the NH SAS, iReady and grade 11 SAT results (0:01:47–0:50:29); introduced by the chair as “Assistant Superintendent and current curriculum director” (0:01:25). The transcript renders him “Mr. Kosky” and “Mr. Caskey”.
Mary HenryBusiness administrator, SAU 6Listed on the masthead; no rows attributed to her. The chair thanks “Mary” for the fiscal procedures at 1:51:00, which does not establish that she was in the room. The minutes credit her with the Plymouth State internship report that the dialogue file gives to Pratt (1:04:57); see flag 8.
Jeff SmallDirector of TechnologyNamed on the recording as having reviewed GBEF and attended the afternoon policy meeting (1:33:51); no rows attributed.
Michael McCosker; Patrick O’HearnDirector of Student Services; HR DirectorListed on the masthead. McCosker is named as having started the Plymouth State contact (“Mike McCusker”, 1:04:57); no remarks attributed to either.
Citizens’ commentsPolicy BEDH itemNo speakers. Chair at 0:00:54: “I see no citizens interested in commenting, so I will close that.” Minutes: “none”.

Agenda

Items as posted in “CSB Agenda 6.3.25 (3).pdf”, with the time each was taken up and its disposition from the recording and the approved minutes. The posted agenda lists seven policy items under “First Reads”; the minutes add an eighth, ADC, which is not on it.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:09I–II. Call to order, Pledge, roll callNot captured; the recording joins mid-roll. Minutes: five present, Crawford and Sprague absent.
0:00:17II.a Consent agendaMinutes approval (5.21.25) and one amendment: “Heather Whitney requested an item added to number 5 to review/discuss the handbooks”; “Consent approval of all consent agenda items” (minutes). On tape: “There’ll be no vote, but it just allows us to have an opportunity for discussion” (0:00:54).
0:00:54II.b Citizens’ commentsNo speakers.
0:01:25III.1 NH SAS grades 3–8, grade 11 SAT, internal benchmarksAgenda: “Presentation of Grade 3-8 NHSAS results and Grade 11 School Day SAT results and other internal benchmarks (Discussion) (Exhibit A)”. Discussion only. Exhibit A is not in the posted packet folder; see flag 1.
0:50:52III.2 Program Effectiveness & Impact on the BudgetAgenda: “Instructional Coaches, Social Workers & policies that impact school culture, social health, and behavior.” Discussion only; see flag 6.
1:12:49III.3 Development of Public Forum Ad Hoc CommitteeAgenda: “Discussion and Approval by Board”, listing membership, purpose, “Timeline for dissolution” and budget implications. No committee was formed. Minutes: “The Board decided it would be beneficial to have a Board member attend the advisory committee meetings; Michael Petrin will be the representative” (1:29:13). No motion or vote is recorded.
1:30:51III.4.a, b, d, e Subcommittee reportsFinance (chair reporting): next meeting June 13 at the Dow building, 9 to 11 (1:31:49). Capital Improvement (Petrin): purpose statement drafted; he will not attend the next meeting (1:32:24). Curriculum: no report. SRVRTC: a planned meeting was postponed (1:32:46); vision and purpose statement (Exhibit I) to go on the website (1:32:53).
1:33:16III.4.c.1–2 GBEF and GBEF-R(1)Exhibits B and C. Minutes: “Heather Whitney made a motion to adopt policy GBEF as presented, William Madden seconded the motion”; adopted, all present in favor (1:35:44). The R(1) procedure was not separately adopted.
1:35:58III.4.c.3–4 JICL and JICL-R(1)Exhibits D and E. Minutes: “Arlene Hawkins made a motion to adopt policy JICL as presented, Loren Howard seconded the motion”; adopted (1:37:07).
1:37:23III.4.c.5 JICKExhibit F. Minutes: “This policy takes two separate policies and consolidates them (the two separate policies will be rescinded at next meeting)”; Whitney moved, Madden seconded; adopted (1:38:23).
1:39:03III.4.c.6 IHBAExhibit G. Minutes: “Confirms the safeguards for students with disabilities”; Whitney moved, Madden seconded; adopted (1:39:57).
1:40:25III.4.c.7 CHCAExhibit H, the unrevised version. Minutes: “Heather Whitney made a motion to move policy CHCA to a second read, including the revisions presented and agreed upon at this meeting, Michael Petrin seconded the motion” (1:47:07). See flag 10.
1:47:31ADC (not on the posted agenda)Minutes, item 8: “ADC- revision to include e-cigarettes”; “Heather Whitney made a motion to adopt policy ADC as revised, William Madden seconded the motion”; adopted (1:48:36). No exhibit in the packet. See flag 2.
1:51:32III.5 Handbook discussion (added)Handbooks circulated to members as a Google Doc; members to comment; Madden to submit paper comments (1:53:29–1:53:54); Whitney shared examples from higher-performing districts (1:56:52).
1:57:41IV. Other businessMadden asked that the approved honor-roll process be applied to the senior class; Pratt at 1:58:54: “having it for the day after tomorrow would be a tough sell.”
1:59:12V–VI. Future dates; adjournmentAgenda: Finance Subcommittee June 13 at the Dow Building, 9 to 11; “Claremont School Board Meeting 6.18.25 6:30pm”. Minutes: “Consent adjournment at 8:30pm”.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction. Every assessment figure below was read aloud from slides that are not in the public packet.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:06The recording joins in progressThe first two rows are fragments, “Next year.” and “Attendance are here for.”; the chair’s first line at 0:00:17 opens “Here are spread. Heather Whitney here.” The call to order, the Pledge and most of the roll are not on the recording.OBSERVATION
0:00:17Minutes of May 21Whitney: “we have, minutes for approval of 52125. I think those were sent out by Chelsea today or yesterday.”
0:02:21How to read the chartsKoski: “Blue below. Proficiency red. Getting there. Yellow is at or above proficient. The solid line is the state average for New Hampshire of last year. They haven’t published their state average for this year. And the dotted line is our scores from the year prior.” The key exists only in this spoken description.MEDIUM
0:02:52ScienceKoski: “If you look at our score from last year, which was 39% huge improvement due to move up”; “close to getting close to the state average in eighth grade, still pretty far behind in fifth grade”. The sentence is too garbled to say which grade the 39% belongs to. At 0:03:18: “the statewide average in the 40s or the high 30s is, is is kind of rough. But our, our 11th grade students really did themselves compared to years past.” At 0:03:52 he credited “Doctor Harrington [Herrington]”’s talk to the junior class. Minutes: “the 11th grade strongly outperformed previous years in science”.OBSERVATION
0:04:58ELAKoski follows the same students from fourth to fifth grade: “you can see a big improvement through for those students via their fifth grade teachers” (0:05:36). At 0:06:34: “looking at the names and seeing who’s in PD and, and things like that, we I can see a connection between the teachers who have kind of embraced the professional development”. No teacher is named.OBSERVATION
0:07:34iReady against NH SASKoski: “I really seems to be a little more generous with proficiency ratings then. The sass test, certainly for third grade. For fifth grade, they scored much higher on the Sass test than they did on the I ready” (0:08:02); “fifth grade proficiency on IRA [iReady] was only 36%.” At 0:08:22: “Fifth grade on the Sass test was 48%.” So iReady ran higher in grade 3 and lower in grade 5. The minutes generalize: “there is higher proficiency demonstrated by iReady than SAS, particularly in reading”.MEDIUM
0:09:52Turnover, not free and reduced lunchKoski: “This year we had some schools, struggled with, leadership situations and teacher turnover and that seemed to very much impact their scores.” On socioeconomic status: “No, we we really have such a large population.” At 0:10:42: “We’ve got the right curriculum in place. We’ve just got to get the instructional practice elevated across the district”.
0:11:21Petrin: required professional developmentPetrin: “kids are doing poorly because adults are doing poorly.” At 0:11:46: “there should be some required professional development or you will do this. You will have this coaching.” Koski at 0:12:10: “I think we finally have enough data to support that kind of approach.”OBSERVATION
0:18:04Madden: “a ceiling”Madden: “You have it looks like a ceiling with the average state score.” At 0:18:14: “That’s a failure. Now, it would be an achievement for our situation right now.” At 0:18:25: “We got to raise the bar dramatically.”OBSERVATION
0:19:13Opt-outs and participationMadden: students whose parents opt them out “get a zero.” At 0:19:21: “I think we should make it uncomfortable to opt out.” The row at 0:19:46 merges the administration’s reply: “We can’t exactly put up barriers to a state rule”; “We had 95% participation.” Minutes: the district “had above 95% participations which is the requirement”.OBSERVATION
0:23:36MathKoski: “You see fourth grade making a big improvement. This is their score in third grade below 20%. Now they’re up near 40%.” At 0:24:09: this was the first year of the new math program; “we are again all over the place with growth or loss. But some signs of, of improvement.” iReady math at 0:25:10: “right around 40% low 30s for, for fifth grade if we flip back fifth grades 28, fourth grades 39, 27.” Those numbers cannot be sorted by grade from the audio.MEDIUM
0:29:52Test preparationWhitney: “is there a reason that we are not mandating test prep universally?” Koski at 0:30:16: “we’re just shy of mandating it”; interim practice tests ran at all schools this year (0:30:47); at 0:31:16: “we can be happy to take direction from the board”.
0:32:40The evaluation tool is bargainedKoski: “teacher evaluation tool is part of the negotiated contract.” Pratt at 0:32:55–0:33:20: a replacement system foundered on cost and a vendor’s refusal to sign the state data agreement; “we weren’t able to use Esser [ESSER] funds.”OBSERVATION
0:40:17Howard’s cautionHoward: “before too quickly jumping into pointing fingers at an individual teacher, I just want teachers who may be watching to think” about class assignments. Hawkins at 0:43:32: “I was in no way suggesting publicly”.OBSERVATION
0:41:17Blinded comparisons for teachersWhitney asked whether a teacher can see how they compare “but have be blinded”. Koski at 0:42:39: data teams in every school look at student data “every two weeks”; at 0:43:04: “people aren’t named, but within that small team.”OBSERVATION
0:45:10Where resources should goKoski: professional development, because “we’re still going to have another 20 plus new teachers this year” (0:45:24); classroom materials, “we’re sorely lacking science materials at the elementary level” (0:46:34); building-level consistency. Hawkins at 0:49:13: “Time is is a resource that I think we’re short of.”
0:49:30Grade 11 SATKoski: “We have 50% ish of our students there. We have a little over 10% scoring above that, but still a good chunk below in both math and in English.” At 0:50:05: “we are a state that tests everybody”; “we’re in the 1050 range.” At 0:50:29: “we nationally score as a state above the national average, but, we as a district are a little bit below that right now.”OBSERVATION
0:51:35Coaches move to the elementary schoolsPratt: “we have coaches at the middle and high school. We don’t have any elementary”. At 0:51:54: “We have three elementary schools. We have three budgeted positions for elementary coaches.” For school year 2026–27 (0:52:21); at 0:52:45: “next year would be the, you know, the final year” for middle- and high-school coaches. At 0:53:29: “we’ve budgeted for three. We only have two”. No vote.OBSERVATION
0:54:05Social workersPratt: “The need for social workers, have grown tremendously. But we’re finding is that we need them, but they’re just not out there”. At 0:55:00: “The ones that we have now, I think, spread very thin.” Petrin and Whitney proposed an assistant or “Social worker extender” (1:02:00); Pratt at 0:59:43: “just to be an assistant social worker, you have to have you have to come to the table with a lot of tools already.”
1:04:30Two Plymouth State internsPratt: “We just. Did that with two psych psychologists from. Plymouth State.” At 1:04:57, a row opening with a member’s question: “What is that program, Mr. Pratt? That’s Plymouth State and that’s our psychologist”, with “Mike McCusker [McCosker]” credited for the contact. The minutes attribute the report to the business administrator.OBSERVATION
1:07:15Classroom managementPratt: next year’s “primary focus to be, is classroom management”. Koski at 1:08:52: a summer course, “Skillful Teacher, run by research for Better Teaching”, at no cost to teachers (1:09:49).
1:13:29The public-forum committee that was not formedHoward: “timeline maybe 12 to 18 months, ideally a budget implication of $0.” At 1:15:49: “I’m really 50/50 with going forward with the committee or just going forward with discussions.” At 1:19:23: it began with “the awkwardness of somebody coming to the podium and asking a question, and us feeling like we can’t answer”. Petrin at 1:24:40: “You can’t just as an individual, you can’t answer for the whole board.” Resolved at 1:29:13 with Petrin named to the advisory committee.
1:33:16Policy Subcommittee: one meeting aheadHawkins: “we met this afternoon, and what we’re doing is we are looking at policies that will be presented at the following meeting so that we are one step ahead.” At 1:33:51: “Our goal is to get through the priorities so that we are in line with statutes that are currently in place.” At 1:50:25: “we do meet every the day of every board meeting before the board meeting.”POSITIVE
1:34:56“Do you think we’ll need a second read”Whitney: “Do you think we’ll need a second read for this or would you like to try to adopt it?” Hawkins at 1:35:00: “I don’t think we need a second read. I think that I don’t know, we didn’t talk about that at our meeting today.” GBEF moved at 1:35:14, adopted at 1:35:44 (“policy is unanimously adopted”).MEDIUM
1:36:55JICL: “adopted. First reading.”Hawkins: “So I will move to adopt JICL school district internet access for students. I’ll second.” The second is Howard’s, merged into her row; the chair at 1:37:02: “Mr. Howard seconds.” Vote at 1:37:07: “saying no opposition policy is adopted. First reading.”MEDIUM
1:37:23JICK consolidates two bullying policiesHawkins: “We actually right now have two separate policies. And this is consolidated into one. It’s the New Hampshire School Board Association sample”. Asked about rescinding the old two, at 1:38:08: “because we have to have seven days notice for withdrawing, that’ll be at our next meeting.” Adopted at 1:38:23.MEDIUM
1:39:03IHBAHawkins: “The one that we currently have is from 2007. This one is been revised in 2024 and it gives more specific information relative to Idea [IDEA] and section 504 programs and safeguards.” Adopted at 1:39:57.MEDIUM
1:40:50CHCA: the wrong version in the packetHawkins: “This is not the revised one. So I’m going to defer.” Pratt at 1:41:28: “You can adopt it based on those revisions. I’m sorry. You can adopt it.” Hawkins moved adoption with revisions (1:41:35); Howard read the wording from the subcommittee’s shared drive at 1:42:58–1:43:21: handbooks in the packet “for the first meeting in June”, a publication-ready copy “by mid-July for final approval at the August board meeting”; at 1:43:40: “to verbalize it for the public in the minutes”.POSITIVE
1:45:26CHCA sent to a second read insteadWhitney: “Should we include that, it would be voted on, approved by the board in the first meeting in August.” At 1:46:37: “So I want to just do this a first read”. The motion at 1:46:49: “move policy CACA [CHCA] to second read with amendments and additions that were made in this meeting”; Petrin seconded; carried at 1:47:07.POSITIVE
1:47:31ADC: “not in your packet”Hawkins: “the last one is policy a DC [ADC] which is not in your packet. I believe we talked about this last meeting to include e-cigarettes per that New Hampshire Department of Education regular.” Pratt at 1:47:58: “For the grant monitoring?” Hawkins at 1:47:59: “the monitoring piece. So I don’t have that. I see that’s not here, but it’s the same policy we have. It’s a revision.” At 1:48:13: the policy in force dates from 2004. Whitney at 1:48:23: “is the board comfortable adopting this without a second read?” Adopted at 1:48:36: “And we’re now compliant there.”MEDIUM
1:48:57Seven more policies; procedures to the websiteHawkins: “for our next meeting we will be bringing forward seven additional”, including finance policies and three attendance policies consolidated into one; at 1:49:34, “Procedural safeguards for special education”. Whitney at 1:51:00: the business administrator “is going to be working on those procedures to make sure that we have links to those procedures”. Hawkins at 1:51:29: “the procedures will be on the website”.POSITIVE
1:53:58HandbooksHawkins: the new policies will change the handbooks so they are “consistent across all three levels” (1:54:26), with the strategic plan and values up front. Madden, on commenting in the Google Doc, at 1:53:29: “That’s that’s too much work for me. How about if I just hand them paper cup.” Pratt at 1:53:54: “Yeah, I can make it work.”
1:57:48Honor roll before graduationMadden: “I was hoping that we could follow the approved honorable [honor roll] process for Stevens, especially for the senior class before graduation.” Pratt at 1:58:54: “we can look at it for as moving forward. But but having it for the day after tomorrow would be a tough sell.” No vote.

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule. Laws are applied as they stood on June 3, 2025. No rule located requires a district to reach any particular assessment result, so achievement findings here are Observations.

MEDIUM Exhibit A, the assessment presentation, is not in the posted packet, so the public has only machine-transcribed numbers

The agenda and the minutes cite “(Exhibit A)” for the NH SAS, iReady and SAT presentation, which took the first fifty minutes of the meeting. The posted packet folder holds the agenda, the May 21 draft minutes and Exhibits B through I; there is no Exhibit A. The by-laws the board adopted on May 21 state: “Any and all presentations by the administration to the board or any committee shall be contained in the agenda and made available to the public in its original format online so the public may download or access the information prior to or during board meetings” (rule 2.09, as printed in the May 21 packet). The consequence is concrete. The presenter described a color key and two reference lines that exist only in his spoken words (0:02:21); the science “39%” cannot be assigned to a grade (0:02:52); the iReady math run “fifth grades 28, fourth grades 39, 27” cannot be sorted (0:25:10); and the minutes’ summary that iReady showed “higher proficiency” than SAS sits beside a spoken grade 5 comparison, 36% on iReady against 48% on SAS, that runs the other way (0:08:02–0:08:22). The presentation is a governmental record open to inspection on request under RSA 91-A:4, I; nothing suggests it was withheld deliberately. The breach is of the board’s own posting rule, which is why this is MEDIUM and not HIGH.

Sources: Claremont School Board By-Laws, rule 2.09 (Exhibit E of the May 21, 2025 packet); RSA 91-A:4, I (right to inspect governmental records); packet folder “23. CSB 6.3.25”; approved minutes, item III.1.

MEDIUM Policy ADC was adopted though it was on no posted agenda and no copy was in the packet

The posted agenda lists seven policy items; ADC is not among them, and the minutes record no agenda amendment adding it (the only amendment added the handbook discussion). The subcommittee chair introduced it as “not in your packet” (1:47:31) and said “I don’t have that. I see that’s not here” (1:47:59); the board adopted it at that first presentation (1:48:36). By-law 2.09 requires the superintendent and chair to “itemize any and all items to be presented in the agenda to ensure members of the public and board are aware, in advance, of any items that may require or result in board action”, and says an action item raised outside the agenda must be “deemed emergency or time sensitive”. No such finding was made. Mitigation: at the May 21 meeting the same member said the Policy Subcommittee would address “the one policy that needs to be updated” for the state’s fiscal-monitoring report, which is the link Pratt and Hawkins make at 1:47:58–1:47:59; the revision adds e-cigarettes to a 2004 policy; and the minutes record the motion, mover, seconder and vote. No statute located requires a New Hampshire school board to publish an agenda item list, so this rests on the board’s own rule.

Sources: Claremont School Board By-Laws, rule 2.09 (Exhibit E of the May 21, 2025 packet); CSB Agenda 6.3.25 (3).pdf; approved minutes, item III.4.c.8; May 21, 2025 page.

MEDIUM Five policies adopted at their first reading by five of seven members, with no motion to suspend the two-read practice

The agenda lists the policy items under “First Reads”. GBEF, JICL, JICK and IHBA were each moved and adopted that night, and so was ADC; only CHCA went to a second read. The chair’s words after JICL describe it: “policy is adopted. First reading” (1:37:07). The decision to skip the second read was taken informally at the first item (“I don’t think we need a second read. I think that I don’t know, we didn’t talk about that at our meeting today”, 1:35:00) and then repeated. Two weeks earlier the same subcommittee chair had said on the record, “we have the two readings which we are suspending”, with a stated reason; here no suspension was moved and the minutes record none. The two-read practice is the board’s own: no statute located requires it and the by-laws in the May 21 packet do not contain it, which is why this is a process flag, not a legal one. Crawford and Sprague were absent for all six actions. One consequence is on the record: JICK replaces two bullying policies, but their withdrawal needs seven days’ notice, so both stayed formally in force after JICK was adopted (1:38:08).

Sources: CSB Agenda 6.3.25 (3).pdf (“First Reads”); approved minutes, item III.4.c; Claremont School Board By-Laws (May 21, 2025 packet), which contain no two-read rule.

OBSERVATION Proficiency below state averages in most grades, with growth in some

As spoken: a science figure of 39% described as last year’s score before a “huge improvement” (0:02:52); statewide science averages “in the 40s or the high 30s” (0:03:18); fourth-grade math up from “below 20%” to “up near 40%” (0:23:36); about half of grade 11 students below the SAT benchmark and “a little over 10%” above, with the district “a little bit below” the national average (0:49:30–0:50:29). Madden called the state-average line “a ceiling” and said “That’s a failure” (0:18:04–0:18:14); those are a member’s characterizations. The state’s minimum standards in Ed 306 govern programs and resources, not test outcomes, and no rule located sets a required proficiency level; this page cites the part only and draws no subsection-level conclusion.

Sources: N.H. Code Admin. R. Ed 306 (minimum standards; part page); approved minutes, item III.1.

OBSERVATION Teacher-level performance was discussed in public session without anyone being named

The assistant superintendent said he could see, by looking “at the names”, which teachers had embraced professional development (0:06:34); the vice chair pressed for required coaching (0:11:46). The line held: no teacher was named at any point on the recording, Howard cautioned against “pointing fingers at an individual teacher” (0:40:17), Hawkins clarified she was “in no way suggesting publicly” (0:43:32), and the administration pointed out that the evaluation tool is “part of the negotiated contract” (0:32:40), which places changes to it in bargaining under RSA 273-A. Had a teacher been identified, discussion of that person’s performance would belong in a nonpublic session properly moved under RSA 91-A:3, II(a) or (c). A related exchange: a member’s proposal to make testing opt-outs “uncomfortable” (0:19:21) met the reply that the district cannot put barriers in front of a state rule and already exceeded 95% participation (0:19:46).

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and II(c); RSA chapter 273-A (public employee labor relations).

OBSERVATION Three budgeted coaching positions will move from the secondary schools to the elementary schools by administrative decision

The superintendent reported that 2025–26 is the last year of middle- and high-school instructional coaches and that the three budgeted coaching positions will go one to each elementary school in 2026–27 (0:51:54–0:52:45); per the minutes, “not due to effectiveness at the middle and high school, but due to the strategic plan”. The item was noticed as discussion; no motion was made. Moving budgeted positions between buildings is administrative, and no rule located requires a board vote for it. Teachers are nominated by the superintendent and elected by the board under RSA 189:39, so the people hired into those posts will come before the board. The superintendent also said only two of three budgeted coaching posts have been filled (0:53:29).

Sources: RSA 189:39 (superintendents nominate, boards elect teachers); approved minutes, item III.2.

OBSERVATION The earliest public copy of these minutes located is dated nine business days after the meeting

RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to be “promptly recorded and open to public inspection not more than 5 business days after the meeting”, which for Tuesday, June 3 was Tuesday, June 10, 2025. The draft located, 6.3.25 DRAFT CSB Meeting Minutes.pdf, was made and filed in the June 18 packet folder on June 16, 2025. That date shows when this copy was posted, not when minutes first became available for inspection at the SAU office, and nothing on this recording speaks to it; so this is an Observation. The same pattern, a draft appearing only with the next packet, is documented with more evidence on the May 21 page.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (pre-August 22, 2025 text); Drive file metadata for the draft (June 16, 2025).

OBSERVATION The recording misses the call to order and roll, and the minutes and transcript disagree on who reported the psychology interns

The recording joins with the fragments “Next year.” and “Attendance are here for.” (0:00:06–0:00:09); the call to order, the Pledge and most of the roll are not on it, so attendance here rests on the minutes. Separately, the minutes say “Mary Henry shared that the district has two psychology interns through a partnership with Plymouth State starting next year”, while the dialogue file gives the passage to Superintendent Pratt, and a member’s question in the same row addresses him (“What is that program, Mr. Pratt?”, 1:04:57). No row in the file is attributed to Henry. The minutes must name “persons appearing before the public bodies”; which of the two reported the interns cannot be settled from the audio transcript, and this page states the conflict rather than choosing.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II; approved minutes, items II and III.2.

POSITIVE A policy backlog worked one meeting ahead, with procedures promised for the website

The Policy Subcommittee meets the afternoon of each board meeting (1:50:25), prepares the policies for the following meeting (1:33:16), takes recommendations from the food-service coordinator, the finance subcommittee and the administration, and states its aim as bringing policy “in line with statutes that are currently in place” (1:33:51). The Director of Technology reviewed the internet-use policies and attended the subcommittee meeting. Seven more policies, including special-education procedural safeguards, were queued for June 18 (1:48:57–1:49:34), and the chair and subcommittee chair committed the district’s fiscal procedures to the website alongside the policies (1:51:00–1:51:29). That answers the May 21 complaint that no member had seen the procedures, and no rule located requires procedures to be published.

Sources: RSA 91-A:1-a, VI(d) (a subcommittee is a public body: “or any committee, subcommittee, or subordinate body thereof, or advisory committee thereto”); approved minutes, item III.4.c.

POSITIVE CHCA was held for a second read when the packet turned out to carry the wrong version

The subcommittee chair found mid-item that the packet held the unrevised policy: “This is not the revised one. So I’m going to defer” (1:40:50). The superintendent urged adoption anyway (1:41:28). Instead, Howard read the revised wording into the record “to verbalize it for the public in the minutes” (1:42:58–1:43:40); the board worked out that it has no July meeting, wrote an approval date into the policy (“approved by the board in the first meeting in August”, 1:45:26), and converted the motion to one sending CHCA to a second read (1:46:49–1:47:07). Declining to adopt a text the public could not see is the right call, and the same instinct would have answered flags 1 and 2.

Sources: approved minutes, item III.4.c.7; Exhibit H- Policy CHCA_ Approval of Handbooks and Directives.docx (1).pdf.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Adjacent meeting pages: Claremont School Board, May 21, 2025; Claremont School Board, June 18, 2025.

Laws and rules cited on this page