Claremont School Board — March 19, 2025

The first meeting of the board after the March 2025 election, built from the CCTV recording, the dialogue transcript, the 16-document packet and the approved minutes. It elected a vice chair and set subcommittees, then took up a proposal to remove policy JBAB (Transgender & Gender Nonconforming Students) that drew 21 public speakers in two comment windows. A motion to table any action for up to three months, without suspending the policy, carried 3–2. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Chair: Heather Whitney.
Board composition
Seven members. Present: Candace Crawford, Loren Howard, William Madden, Frank Sprague, Heather Whitney. Absent: Arlene Hawkins, Michael Petrin. Howard and Madden were welcomed as new members at 0:00:27.
Date
Wednesday, March 19, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled; the pledge is under way at 0:00:02. The minutes record nonpublic session from 7:15 to 8:10 p.m. and “Consent adjournment at 9:31pm”, an hour past the 8:30 p.m. scheduled adjournment. The recording runs 2:07:55 and skips the nonpublic recess (about 80 seconds of tape span a 55-minute gap); 2:07:55 plus the recess reconciles to the minuted 9:31 p.m. within a few minutes.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the agenda; audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting 3/19/25 (2:07:55; public session only)
Minutes
19. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.19.25 (approved; Attorney Matthew H. Upton’s March 19 email on JBAB is appended). Nonpublic minutes were sealed for six months; this page did not locate them. See flag 1.

Participants

Everyone recorded as present or heard. Names and wards follow the approved minutes; where the transcript or the dialogue file renders a name differently, that is noted.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyBoard chairPresided; made the subcommittee appointments; seconded the vice-chair nomination; moved to seal the nonpublic minutes; spoke and voted against the amended JBAB motion; moved ACN and IHBCA to adoption.
Michael PetrinBoard member; elected vice chair in absenceAbsent. Nominated by Sprague (“Like to nominate Mike patron, the space chair”), seconded by the chair, elected by voice vote. Appointed Capital Improvement chair.
Frank SpragueBoard member; Finance Subcommittee chair; NHSBA alternateNominated Petrin; seconded the nonpublic motion and the JBAB motion; moved ILBA and most Title IX policy motions; voted against the amended JBAB motion and the tabling motion. The minutes’ masthead still lists him as “Vice Chair”.
Candace CrawfordBoard member; SRVRTC Committee chairMoved the nonpublic session and the JBAB motion; accepted Howard’s friendly amendment; moved to table the remaining policies; moved the pre-populated agenda; announced the CTE grant and a CTE facilities review.
William “Bill” MaddenBoard member (new)Voted for the amended JBAB motion and for tabling the remaining policies; objected that the policy packet had no executive summary. Appointed to Policy and Curriculum.
Loren HowardBoard member (new); NHSBA delegateMoved the amendment that died for want of a second, then the friendly amendment that carried; seconded the tabling motion and voted against it. Addressed as “Mr. Warren” and “Lauren” on the tape.
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; Policy Subcommittee chairAbsent. Appointed in absence to chair Policy and to represent the board on Curriculum.
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkCalled the roll and the roll-call votes; read motions back at the chair’s request. Addressed as “Miss Chromebook” on the tape.
Christopher PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Read a prepared statement on the policies that protect students whatever the board decided on JBAB.
Michael KoskiAssistant Superintendent; Title IX coordinatorPresented each policy; read the nonpublic exemption; explained the Title IX changes. Labeled “Mike Koski” in the dialogue file.
Liza DraperCitizens’ comments — Ward 3Against changing the policy; cited the Gavin Grimm case, two New Hampshire athletics cases and a Manchester case. “Lisa Draper” in the transcript.
Camron LownieCitizens’ comments — Ward 2; district teacherAgainst rescinding; three reasons, ending with suicide-risk data. “Cameron Louny” in the transcript; the minutes also write “Mr. Lowney”.
Kelly FontaineCitizens’ comments — Ward 1; district teacherAgainst changing the policy; described a transgender student at the high school before the policy existed.
Patrick AdrianCitizens’ comments — Ward 1; former board memberAsked why removal rather than review; later asked to speak again on the policy’s history and was refused.
Dylan MarshCitizens’ comments — district parentAgainst removal; said he held an email from the NHSBA executive director advising against removing any policy.
Onyx AdrianCitizens’ comments — Ward 1; Stevens studentFor review rather than removal, from a student’s perspective.
Jess DyerCitizens’ comments — Ward 1Two turns: what the plan would be to protect students; then gender identity versus sexual orientation. First introduced as “Jeff Stier” in the transcript.
Anna O’HaraCitizens’ comments — lifelong resident“This is not leadership. It is capitulation to outside pressure”.
Hanna BrooksCitizens’ comments — residentAgainst removal; cited a 28% suicide-attempt figure for transgender youth in New Hampshire high schools. “Hannah Brooks” in the transcript.
Jen GallagherCitizens’ comments — Ward 1; former board memberRead the district mission back to the board; asked it to keep the policy and review with counsel. She introduces herself as “Jen Gallagher” and the minutes use that name; the dialogue file labels her “Jennifer Gallagher” after a name normalization on August 28, 2026.
Hope DamonCitizens’ comments — State RepresentativeOn process: urged a motion to table and get legal advice.
Wayne HemingwayCitizens’ comments — State Representative, Ward 1The one first-window speaker who questioned the policy: “provisions in there that do not protect everyone”; asked the board to hear both sides.
Sam TorresCitizens’ commentsReplied to Hemingway on restroom safety; the chair then called for respect.
Codi RaymondCitizens’ comments — Ward 1Found no direct order in the packet; noted gender identity is protected under state law. “Cody Raymond” in the transcript.
Ken BrummelCitizens’ comments — Ward 2No legislation requires the change; “lawyers are about protecting assets. They are not protecting the mission.”
Rebecca MacKenzieCitizens’ comments — Ward 2; mental health professionalAsked the board to weigh the district’s youth risk behavior survey data. “Rebecca McKenzie” in the transcript.
Rebecca (surname unsettled)Citizens’ comments — Ward 1; Claremont Middle School teacher and district parentSecond window: “suspension is the same as removing.” The approved minutes print “Rebecca Vindeska”; the dialogue file labels her “Rebecca Vinduska”, the spelling on a 2023 Byrne Foundation letter addressed to a Claremont Middle School teacher; she is heard as “Rebecca von Duska”. The project has not settled the spelling.
Ken LownieCitizens’ comments — Ward 2Against suspension: “That’s the headline that will come out of this”. “Ken Louny” in the transcript.
Matt MooshianCitizens’ comments — Ward 3Against suspension; cited the 28% figure. He calls himself a former at-large city councilor; the minutes say “city councilman”. On the tape he gives only “Matt”.
Eric BentleyCitizens’ comments — Ward 2; district parentThe one second-window speaker in favor of suspending: concerns about parental disclosure and compelled speech.
Karry Rochford-HagueCitizens’ comments — district employeeAsked why no counsel was present and whether counsel’s advice could be shared.

Named in the minutes’ masthead but not heard: student board members Miles Sheehan and Lilly Clark (the district’s spelling; the dialogue file has no row for either), Director of Student Services Michael McCosker, Director of Technology Jeff Small, HR Director Patrick O’Hearn and Business Administrator Mary Henry. The dialogue file labels 22 rows Unidentified and 9 Multiple, mostly audience interjections and voice votes.

Agenda

Items as posted in “CSB Agenda 3.19.25 (4).pdf”, with the time each was taken up. Dispositions quote the approved minutes unless marked as the recording.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:02I. Call to order and pledgeAgenda: “6:30 PM Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance”.
0:00:53II. Election of board officers: vice chairMinutes: “Frank Sprague nominated Michael Petrin as vice chair, Heather Whitney seconded the motion; no discussion, no other nominations”; “Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor”. On the recording the chair first called the vote without asking for other nominations; at 0:01:08 a voice prompted her, and she asked and called it again.
0:01:29III. Roll callMinutes: present Crawford, Howard, Madden, Sprague, Whitney; absent Hawkins, Petrin.
0:01:41III.a Consent agendaAgenda approval and the 3.5.25 minutes. Chair: “If there is no objection, we will accept the consent agenda.” Minutes: “Consent approval”.
0:02:23III.b Citizens’ comments (policy BEDH)Opened to agenda and non-agenda topics, three minutes each, 30-minute limit, with a second window before the vote. Sixteen speakers (Dyer twice); closed at 0:40:47. The superintendent then read a statement. See flag 5.
0:43:21IV.1 Nonpublic session, RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c)Minutes: Crawford moved, Sprague seconded, roll call, all present in favor; in at 7:15 p.m.; Sprague moved and Whitney seconded the return, roll call; out at 8:10 p.m.; “Heather Whitney made a motion to seal the minutes for 6 months, Candace Crawford seconded the motion; roll call vote taken by Noelle Kronberg, all present voting in favor”. See flag 1 and flag 6.
0:46:09IV.2 New members; appointmentsBy the chair: Capital Improvement, Petrin (chair), Crawford; Finance, Sprague (chair), Whitney, Crawford; Policy, Hawkins (chair), Madden, Howard; Curriculum, Hawkins, Madden; SRVRTC, Crawford (chair), Petrin, Howard. No vote.
0:48:23IV.3 ILBA, Assessment of Educational Programs (revision)Minutes: Sprague moved adoption, Crawford seconded (“change ‘annually’ to ‘before the start of each school year’”); voice vote, all present in favor.
0:51:14IV.3 JBAB, Transgender & Gender Nonconforming Students (removal)Crawford moved to suspend enforcement pending review within three months; Sprague seconded. Howard’s amendment (no suspension) got no second. Later, as a friendly amendment Crawford accepted, the motion became: “to table any action on the policy until it can be reviewed by the policy committee and legal counsel within 3 months” (minutes). Carried 3–2 at 1:34:52: “Mr. Howard, Mr. Madden, and Ms. Crawford voted in favor; Mr. Sprague and Ms. Whitney voted against”. JBAB stayed in force.
1:35:45IV.3 Motion to table the remaining policiesCrawford moved, Howard seconded, amended to “within 3 months”. Failed at 1:46:57. Minutes: “Ms. Crawford and Mr. Madden voting in favor, Mr. Howard, Mr. Sprague, and Ms. Whitney voting against”.
1:47:02IV.3 ACAC, Title IX Sexual Harassment and Grievance Process (emergency read)Sprague moved to second read, Howard seconded; “Voice vote taken, the motion passes” (minutes). Not adopted. See flag 4.
1:49:10IV.3 AC and AC-R(2) (emergency read)Sprague moved to second read, Whitney seconded; all present in favor. Koski confirmed the Title IX, Section 504 and ADA coordinators “currently exist and are posted on the website”.
1:51:00IV.3 ACA, Discrimination and Harassment Grievance Procedure (emergency read)Sprague moved to second read, Whitney seconded; all present in favor.
1:52:16IV.3 ACN, Accommodation of Nursing Mothers (emergency read)Whitney moved adoption without second read, Sprague seconded (minutes); all present in favor.
1:53:21IV.3 GBAM and IHBCA, accommodation of pregnancy (emergency read)GBAM: Sprague moved adoption, Whitney seconded. IHBCA: Whitney moved adoption, Howard seconded (minutes). Both adopted, all present in favor.
1:55:57IV.4 NHSBA delegateHoward as delegate, Sprague as alternate; voice vote, all present in favor.
1:58:35IV.5 Pre-populated agenda (Exhibit J)Crawford moved adoption “with the understanding that it can be amended as needed”, Whitney seconded (minutes); all present in favor.
2:01:37IV.6 Schedule school board retreat (Exhibit K)Deferred with two members absent; dates to go out by email; weekday evenings about 5:30 to 7:30.
2:04:28V–VI. Other business; future dates and itemsBoard 4/2/25; Finance 4/4/25; SAU 6 4/10/25; Board 4/16/25. A CTE grant to go to a public hearing at the next meeting; a CTE facilities and program review at the second April meeting.
2:07:15VII. Adjournment“Is there no other business? I will take the executive action and.” Minutes: “Consent adjournment at 9:31pm”.

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:00:27A new board is seatedWhitney: “I would like to welcome Lauren [Loren] Howard to the board and Mr. William Madden to the board.” Sprague at 0:00:53: “Like to nominate Mike patron [Petrin], the space [vice] chair.”
0:02:23How the chair structured public comment“say your piece now on the non-agenda item or the agenda related item of your choice. Three minutes per individual. And nobody can speak twice until everyone has spoken.” At 0:02:49: others could speak “after we have a full debate but prior to our vote.” At 0:03:41: a sign-in sheet for name and ward, and a non-resident parent allowed to speak.OBSERVATION POSITIVE
0:04:09Liza Draper (Ward 3): the case law“It was put in place in 2016 for the protection of our trans and gender nonconforming students. And if you read it carefully, it has in it the comment that everything should be addressed on a case by case basis.” At 0:05:01, Gavin Grimm: “he won a $1.3 million settlement against said school district”. At 0:07:26: “Please think carefully.”OBSERVATION
0:08:13Camron Lownie (Ward 2), Disnard teacher“I can’t do my job of teaching reading, writing unless the kids are emotionally safe.” At 0:09:18: the executive order’s survival “seems 5050 at best.” At 0:10:40: “roughly half have strongly considered suicide in the past year. That’s the whole ball game right there.”
0:11:30Kelly Fontaine (Ward 1), teacherAt 0:11:56: “There was a student, that was very dear to me that was at the high school who was a transgender student shortly before this policy was written.” At 0:12:19: “A 14 year old cannot blaze their own trail.”
0:13:01Patrick Adrian (Ward 1): why removal, not review?“Why is this one removal? Why not review?” “Frank and I were on the board that passed this policy back in 2016.” At 0:14:40: “There’s not going to be any pulling of federal funding anytime soon.” At 0:14:59, of the NHSBA: “Sit down. You you get together your your legal counsel and you talk about it.”OBSERVATION
0:15:49Dylan Marsh, parent: the NHSBA and the moneyAt 0:16:13: an email “from Barrett Christina, the executive director of the New Hampshire School Board Association, to another school board chair, saying, I do not recommend removing any policy.” At 0:17:09: “we have a price that we are willing to accept to remove civil rights for students.”OBSERVATION
0:17:57Onyx Adrian (Ward 1), student“every other policy that is in the agenda for tonight is under, review rather than complete removal.” At 0:18:46: “students are more willing to cooperate and to learn when they feel in a safe environment.”
0:20:08Jess Dyer (Ward 1): what is the plan?“I regretfully admit that I have never spoke at a school board meeting”. At 0:20:54: “if this is really about the threat to federal funding, what is the plan going forward?” At 0:22:49: “I see you. I’m glad you’re here. You matter and we’re going to fight for you.”
0:23:17Anna O’Hara and Hanna BrooksO’Hara at 0:24:06: “This is not leadership. It is capitulation to outside pressure at the expense of our most vulnerable students.” Brooks at 0:25:36: “28% of transgender youth in New Hampshire high schools have attempted suicide in the past year.”
0:26:20Jen Gallagher (Ward 1): the mission statement“Just a year ago, I was sitting right where you are.” At 0:26:45: “It doesn’t say some students. It doesn’t say gender conforming students. It says every student.” At 0:27:21: “complying in advance sends the wrong message”.
0:27:39Rep. Hope Damon: process“State Representative Hope Damon serving the nine towns of Sullivan district eight.” “the process so far is extremely incomplete”; she hopes for “a motion later this evening to table this and get legal advice”.OBSERVATION
0:28:58Rep. Wayne Hemingway: the other side“I’m Wayne Hemingway, state rep, district eight”. At 0:29:20: “Where is the justice for the non trans?” “there are provisions in there that do not protect everyone”. At 0:29:52: “When you allow a male into a female bathroom, without the separations and the abilities to give them privacy, as the policy says, then we are putting our children in a position where they could be harmed.” At 0:31:00: “we need to hear both sides.”
0:31:32Sam Torres replies; the chair asks for respect“as a female, I have never once felt threatened in a bathroom. And if a man were to come into the bathroom, I would feel more threatened by a man like you than any queer person I’ve ever met.” Whitney at 0:32:05: “there are no villains in this room”.
0:32:53Codi Raymond (Ward 1): protected class“I didn’t actually see in the board packet where there was a direct order from anyone to get rid of this policy”. “gender identity is still a protected class under state statutes”. At 0:33:22: “if you can remove this policy, but you still have to provide everything that’s in it until the law changes.”OBSERVATION
0:33:54Ken Brummel (Ward 2): process“Our government did not pass any legislation.” “lawyers are about protecting assets. They are not protecting the mission.”
0:35:24Jess Dyer’s second turn“gender identity is not the same as sexual orientation.” The chair: “Please address the chair.” At 0:36:55: the administration had “Took away the federal ban for public facilities to have protections for like segregation and stuff.”
0:38:14Rebecca MacKenzie (Ward 2)“as a mental health professional.” At 0:38:30: the district’s survey (“a y s, [YRBS] survey”) shows children “that do not feel safe and that do contemplate suicide.”
0:40:47Comment closes; the superintendent’s statement“We reached our 30 minute limit for public comments.” Pratt at 0:41:58: “If the policy j, B, a, b is tabled, removed or rescinded. We want to assure the community that a robust framework of existing policies and procedures will continue to protect the students.” At 0:42:58: “the district has designated a title nine co-ordinator”.OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
0:43:21Nonpublic session; the tape pauses“I need a motion to move into nonpublic session.” Crawford: “So moved.” Sprague: “Second.” Koski at 0:43:32 reads the exemption (“RSA 9184132. Print sees a.” in the transcript; the minutes give RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c) in full). Roll call. The recording resumes at 0:45:21; the return motion is at 0:45:32, and at 0:45:48 Whitney moves “to seal the nonpublic minutes for six months.”MEDIUM POSITIVE
0:46:09Appointments“although some of the members are not present, they have consented or they will find out that they have been volunteered to do certain things.”
0:51:14JBAB: counsel’s letterKoski: “There is a letter from Attorney Upton in your packet”; “it has been rescinded by the New Hampshire School Board Association with advice to contact council, which we did.” At 0:51:45: “The policy JBABB rescinded or enforcement of the policy be suspended. So void any possibility that federal funding might be compromised.” The letter, appended to the minutes, is time-stamped 3:49 p.m. that day and says JBAB “has not been reviewed since the adoption of RSA 193:41 or in response to recent changes relative to Title IX”.OBSERVATION OBSERVATION
0:52:06The motion as first madeCrawford: “That the policy, the enforcement of the policy be suspended until we can have further discussion with our school board attorney and the review of this policy by our policy committee.” Sprague: “I’ll second.” At 0:53:37: “with the next three months.”
0:53:49Sprague: too specificAt 0:54:15: “With such specificity, I think exposes us to legal consequences due to that specificity.” He would put decisions to building leaders or the superintendent, “with an avenue for an appeal to the school board”. At 0:54:48: “one of the problems with JD [JBAB] is there’s literally too much to it.”
0:56:09Madden on the policy book“I’m starting to read the policies of the school board as opposed to just Stevens. They don’t match.” “there’s stuff from 2007 where I really believe it’s never been proofread”. The chair kept him to the motion.
0:57:18Howard’s amendment dies“I’m in support of tabling this until we can make revisions with legal counsel. But I’d like to amend it to not suspend the current policy that’s in place.” At 0:58:01: “Is there anyone in support of seconding that motion?” At 0:58:09: “Seeing no second the motion fails.”
0:58:22Crawford: what changed her mind“that’s where I was until I read the response from our attorney. I, I was there half an hour ago.” At 0:58:59: “I have talked to the attorney also, and he assures me that this wording is appropriate.”OBSERVATION
1:01:05Howard: no explicit threat“us not having a timeline from the federal government and an actual explicit threat to pull Claremont’s funding, there’s no reason to remove this policy”. At 1:01:57: “you’re not going to get this $10 million if you don’t undo this.”
1:02:35Whitney: parts are already non-compliant“there are some portions of the policy that are not compliant currently. Regardless.” “we are non-compliant with parental involvement and notification.” At 1:03:06: “So those actions would be unenforceable as the policy stands now.” Howard at 1:04:03 proposed removing only the parental-rights portion.OBSERVATION
1:05:10One of 15 districtsWhitney: “we were one of only 15 districts that actually have has a specific policy related to transgender and nonconforming youth.” Crawford at 1:06:06: “It hasn’t been an issue.” Howard at 1:06:50: “suspension and removal, even if it’s just three months or synonymous for trans kids in our schools”. At 1:07:47: “Trans children absolutely knew this policy existed.”
1:08:19Whitney: the culture is the people“I personally do not feel that this policy has created the positive culture that we’ve had in our district”. At 1:09:42: “I cannot foresee a sea change of culture shift”. Crawford at 1:09:55: “my motion is to table the policy. It is not to rescind the policy”.
1:11:05Second window: Rebecca, CMS teacher (Ward 1)At 1:11:08: “My feeling is that suspending the enforcement is the same as removing it.” At 1:12:03: “I am so proud of this district for being one of the 15 who stood up.” At 1:13:25: “suspension is the same as removing.”
1:14:02Ken Lownie (Ward 2)At 1:14:51: “it’s just that little piece of rescinding the enforcement of it. That’s the headline that will come out of this”. At 1:15:12: “Just love the kids, just love the kids.”
1:15:55Matt Mooshian (Ward 3)“I’m a former at large city councilor here in Clermont [Claremont].” At 1:16:24: “28% of transgender students in New Hampshire attempted suicide.”
1:17:57Eric Bentley (Ward 2): suspend and retoolAt 1:19:18: “You’re not going to disclose information to parents, which I think is probably the number one issue in the entire policy.” At 1:19:47: “I think suspending and reviewing the policy and maybe retooling it in a way that leaves out some of those more concerning issues, would be the smart thing to do.”
1:20:50A second turn refusedAdrian asks to speak on “The history. Of this policy”. Whitney at 1:21:28: “I think it is irrelevant to this board who administered the policy? No. I’m sorry, I’m sorry, I’m sorry you spoke earlier.” Minutes: “Patrick Adrian requested to speak regarding the history of the policy and Ms. Whitney denied the request”.OBSERVATION
1:22:36Why no lawyer tonight?Rochford-Hague: “I’m wondering why there isn’t legal representation here tonight”. Whitney at 1:22:58: “There’s no legal representation here because we consulted our attorney and got advice.” Howard at 1:23:37: “We did get the email at 348 [3:48].” At 1:23:49: “he only got us his opinion on it at 4:00 today, which is sort of hardly enough time to actually read the email.”OBSERVATION
1:24:57The friendly amendmentHoward: “it would be to move forward with this motion, but to not suspend the policy during that period of revision and review. We can still keep the three month timeline.” Crawford at 1:25:31: “Table it. We will table any action on this, on this policy until review by our policy committee and our school attorney.” Whitney: “Within three months.”
1:26:35The chair speaks against the amended motion“I have consider myself a person who is would be considered an ally of the LGBTQ community.” At 1:27:47: “I’m extremely protective of women’s faces [spaces].” At 1:28:38: “I am in favor of suspension because I believe that there are more rights on the table here.” At 1:29:46: “I don’t consent for my father in law to present when I’m undressing.” At 1:32:19: “my issue really is consent.” At 1:33:25: “the vocal folks here do not necessarily represent the entirety of the parents in the district.”
1:30:42Howard’s reply“it says a case by case basis.” “Your concern of a male in the locker room is something that would happen with or without a policy.” At 1:31:56: “we would have had increasingly numbers of reported sexual harassment cases in locker rooms over the last ten years that the policy had been in place.”
1:34:29The vote: 3–2, JBAB stays in forceThe chair puts “the motion as it stands, which is allowing the policy to stand” (1:33:59). Chorus at 1:34:48; at 1:34:52: “So 3 to 2 motion passes.” Names from the minutes: Howard, Madden and Crawford for; Sprague and Whitney against.
1:35:45Table the Title IX policies?Crawford moves to table the rest. Sprague at 1:36:37: “So are these changes due to executive orders?” Koski: “No. Changes to title nine to the federal law.” At 1:36:53: “January 9th, I believe.” At 1:37:07: an emergency read because “being outside of the federal law creates a lot of liability for the district.” Crawford at 1:37:25: “this is just gotten sprung on us as school board members.”OBSERVATION
1:38:37“fully vetted” or notWhitney: “these were fully vetted by the New Hampshire School Board Association.” Crawford at 1:39:34: “They weren’t vetted by the policy committee. I did not hear anything from our school board attorney.” Whitney at 1:41:14: “I had asked not to have all these policies come to this meeting”.OBSERVATION
1:40:04Koski: tabling ACAC leaves the coordinator out of step“If we table AC, AC [ACAC], it lays out the processes for me to follow as the title nine coordinator. I would then be out of compliance for any title nine investigations that may occur in the next three months, and I get them about once every two weeks.” At 1:41:42: under the new law the definition’s “or is are replaced with ands”; at 1:42:10, “ten days for, response by the defendant, ten days for response to that response by the accuser.”OBSERVATION
1:43:59Madden: “pushed into doing something”“I’m not allowed to visit the schools now because the policies have not been complied with.” At 1:44:14: “I feel like there’s no executive summary sheet here that tells me exactly what the implications are. I feel like I’m being pushed into doing something without full knowledge”. Koski at 1:44:56: “it hasn’t been requested in the past”. Offered abstention, at 1:45:57: “It’s an option and it’s an abdication of my responsibility.”OBSERVATION
1:46:57Tabling fails; ACAC to second read“Motion fails. We’ll move forward.” Koski at 1:47:02: ACAC “is the policy we followed until August of 2024”; at 1:47:32, “we’re just we’re returning to a prior title nine version.” Moved to second read, not adopted.OBSERVATION
1:52:16ACN wordingKoski: “the language has changed. To nursing mothers from people in need of lactation.” Howard at 1:52:51: “I think it’s silly that we have to discuss, even change the language because those terms are synonymous. But I’m going to vote yes nonetheless.”
1:55:43More policies to updateKoski: “Mr. Madden has mentioned there are many more that need to be updated.” Madden: “Yeah. No, they all need to be updated.”
1:56:23NHSBA delegateSprague: the association “is essentially a lobbying group, and they lobby in Concord on behalf of their membership.” Howard volunteers; Sprague alternate.
1:58:35The pre-populated agenda“prior to the establishment of this pre-populated agenda, we had issues with kind of items falling off to the wayside and, you know, not being addressed”. At 2:00:14: timed to match district activities such as state test results.POSITIVE
2:04:56A $45,000 CTE grant needs a hearingCrawford: “Miss Harrington got a grant for about $45,000 for, self screening equipment and training of the staff to enhance the entrepreneurship program”. At 2:05:29: “But we have to put it on the agenda and have a hearing. So that will be on next meetings agenda.” A CTE facilities review follows at the second April meeting.POSITIVE

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule.

MEDIUM Nonpublic minutes sealed for six months with no statutory determination recorded

Nonpublic minutes must be disclosed within 72 hours unless, “by recorded vote of 2/3 of the members present taken in public session, it is determined that divulgence of the information likely would affect adversely the reputation of any person other than a member of the public body itself, or render the proposed action ineffective”, or concerns emergency preparedness (RSA 91-A:3, III). The recorded vote is there: Whitney moved to seal for six months at 0:45:48, Crawford seconded, and the minutes record a roll call with all present in favor. What neither the recording nor the minutes contains is the determination the statute pairs with that vote: no ground was stated on the motion. This is a documentation gap, not evidence that sealing was unwarranted; the session was entered under II(a) and (c), and II(c) matters are the kind a body could find would harm a reputation. A stated finding in the motion and the minutes would let a reader check it.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, II(a), II(c), III (2023, 189:1, eff. Oct. 3, 2023; text read 2026-09-25); 19. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.19.25, item IV.1.

OBSERVATION State non-discrimination law does not depend on JBAB; a 2024 athletics statute bears on part of it

New Hampshire law provides that no person shall be excluded from, denied the benefits of, or discriminated against in public schools because of, among other things, “gender identity, sexual orientation”, with a civil action or a Human Rights Commission complaint available (RSA 193:38, in the form in force since September 1, 2024). That duty runs to the district whether JBAB exists or not. Codi Raymond made the point from the floor (0:32:53–0:33:22), and the superintendent’s statement listed the other policies that “will continue to protect the students” (0:41:58). Counsel’s letter says JBAB “has not been reviewed since the adoption of RSA 193:41”. That statute, effective August 18, 2024, requires school teams to be designated by biological sex and provides that teams for girls “shall not be open to students of the male sex”; it is the likeliest basis for the chair’s statement that parts of JBAB on sports are “not compliant currently” (1:02:35). This page has not identified a statute behind her parallel statement on parental notification. The review the board ordered is the place to settle which parts of JBAB conflict with current state law.

Sources: RSA 193:38 (2019, 282:1; 2024, 117:1, eff. Sept. 1, 2024; text read 2026-09-25); RSA 193:41, II–III (school athletics; 2024, 228:1, eff. Aug. 18, 2024; text read 2026-09-25); Policy JBAB Upton Email 3.19.25.pdf.

OBSERVATION The board acted on counsel’s advice received less than three hours before the meeting, on policies two members said they could not assess

Attorney Upton’s email recommending that JBAB “be rescinded or enforcement off the policy be suspended” is time-stamped 3:49 p.m. on the day of a 6:30 p.m. meeting (attached to the minutes). Howard said this left “hardly enough time to actually read the email” and that the item “should have been on a later agenda item” (1:23:49); Crawford said the letter changed her position “half an hour ago” (0:58:22) and, on the Title IX set, “They weren’t vetted by the policy committee” (1:39:34); Madden felt “pushed into doing something without full knowledge” (1:44:14). The chair’s answers are on the record too: the NHSBA had annotated the policies, members received them “at the prescribed time”, and she had asked not to bring them all to this meeting (1:38:37–1:41:14). Speakers disputed what the NHSBA had advised: Marsh said he held an email from its executive director against removing any policy (0:16:13); Koski said the association had rescinded its model policy (0:51:14). No rule this project has verified sets a packet deadline or a legal-review requirement for a school board; the Right-to-Know Law’s notice rule goes to the meeting, not the packet. The outcome limited the effect: the board tabled JBAB without suspending it.

Sources: Policy JBAB Upton Email 3.19.25.pdf; approved minutes, item IV.3; RSA 91-A:2, cited for what it does not require.

OBSERVATION The Title IX grievance policy the coordinator said he needs was left at second read

Koski, the district’s Title IX coordinator, said ACAC as presented returns the district to “the policy we followed until August of 2024” (1:47:02) to match a federal change he dated “January 9th” (1:36:53); the minutes say “the end of January”. The packet includes a Department of Education release titled “U.S. Department of Education to Enforce 2020 Title IX Rule Protecting Women”. He told the board that without ACAC he “would then be out of compliance for any title nine investigations that may occur in the next three months, and I get them about once every two weeks” (1:40:04). The motion to table failed 2–3, but ACAC went to a second read rather than adoption, so on his account the board’s adopted policy still reflects the August 2024 framework until a later vote. The 2020 rule requires a recipient to “adopt, publish, and implement grievance procedures” and to follow its formal-complaint process. This page does not evaluate which federal text governed on March 19, 2025 or whether the district’s investigations complied; it records the gap the coordinator described and the meeting at which a vote should close it.

Sources: 34 CFR 106.8 and 106.45 (2020 rule, 85 FR 30026); U.S. Department of Education to Enforce 2020 Title IX Rule Protecting Women _ U.S. Department of Education.pdf; Title IX Enforcement Directive DCL (PDF).pdf; Exhibit C, Policy ACAC.

OBSERVATION Public comment met the 30-minute floor; the second-turn refusal was within the chair’s discretion, and the policy’s board-discussion step was replaced by a statement

State law requires a public comment period of “no less than 30 minutes” (RSA 189:74), and policy BEDH promises “a minimum of thirty minutes in total”. The first window ran from 0:02:23 to 0:40:47, about 38 minutes, and a second window preceded the vote, so the floor was met. The chair opened the first window to agenda items as well, broader than BEDH §B.2, which places it on topics “not listed on the agenda”. Two points go the other way. BEDH §B.6 says speakers “may be allotted another 3 minutes, for a total of 6 minutes per person, on agenda items following Board discussion”; the chair refused Patrick Adrian that second turn (1:21:28). The wording is permissive, so the refusal was within the chair’s discretion, but it fell on the one speaker who had served on the board that adopted JBAB. And §B.5 calls for “Board Discussion Regarding Citizens Comments” after the period closes; instead the superintendent read a prepared statement (0:41:15). BEDH was read from the live copy linked on the agenda, titled as approved September 6, 2023.

Sources: RSA 189:74 (2022, 333:1; per the project’s verified anchors, not re-read); Policy BEDH, Public Comment and Participation (read 2026-09-25); approved minutes.

POSITIVE The nonpublic session was entered and left correctly on the record

The exemption was read into the record before the vote (0:43:32) and the minutes reproduce RSA 91-A:3, II(a) and (c) in full, meeting the rule that the motion “state on its face the specific exemption”. Entry and return were each by roll-call vote, with times recorded (7:15 and 8:10 p.m.), and the seal vote was taken in public session. The one gap is the missing determination for the seal, at flag 1.

Sources: RSA 91-A:3, I(b) and III; approved minutes, item IV.1.

POSITIVE A $45,000 grant sent to a public hearing before acceptance, and a standing agenda so items stop falling off

Crawford brought forward a grant of about $45,000 for CTE equipment and training and did not ask the board to accept it that night: “we have to put it on the agenda and have a hearing” (2:05:29). For unanticipated funds of $20,000 or more, the statute requires a public hearing with at least seven days’ newspaper notice before acceptance; that threshold has applied since July 18, 2023. The board also adopted its pre-populated agenda, which the chair said exists because items were “falling off to the wayside” (1:58:35).

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, III(a) (2023, 38:1, eff. July 18, 2023; per the project’s verified anchors); Exhibit J-Pre-Populated Agenda .docx (1).pdf.

POSITIVE The minutes name every speaker and record the split votes by name

Minutes must include “the names of members, persons appearing before the public bodies, a brief description of the subject matter discussed and final decisions”, and the movers and seconders. These minutes name all 21 public speakers with ward where given and a line on each position, including the one who questioned the policy and the one who favored suspension; they name movers and seconders for every motion; and they record both divided votes by member (3–2 on JBAB, 2–3 on tabling), where the recording captures only a chorus. The comment period itself drew residents on both sides and the chair asked the room to treat each other as neighbors (0:32:05). One defect: the masthead still lists Sprague as vice chair on the page that records Petrin’s election.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (text read 2026-09-25; the mover/seconder clause applies to this meeting, the start/end-time clauses only from Aug. 22, 2025); approved minutes.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page