Claremont School Board — March 5, 2025

Regular meeting of the Claremont School Board, built from the CCTV recording, the dialogue transcript, the posted agenda and seven-document packet, and the approved minutes. The last meeting before the March 11 election: the student board members give their account of the February 11 lockdown at Stevens High School, auditor Michael Campo of Plodzik & Sanderson reports the FY2020 audit findings and the backlog behind them, and a proposed safety-specialist position is debated and withdrawn. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6). Chair: Heather Whitney.
Date
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled. Called to order at 0:00:04; roll call at 0:00:35; motion to adjourn at 2:51:39. The minutes record a consent adjournment at 9:20 p.m., consistent within about two minutes with a 6:30 start and the 2:51:47 recording. No nonpublic session.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, per the agenda (audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8)
Board composition
Seven members; six present, Michael Petrin absent, per the minutes. Bonnie Miles and Whitney Skillen were thanked for their service at their last meeting before the March 11 election.
Recording
Cablecast: School Board Meeting - 3/5/25 (2:51:47; call to order through the motion to adjourn)
Minutes
18. Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25 (approved; Drive file created March 25, 2025)

Participants

Everyone heard or recorded as present. Names and attendance follow the agenda and approved minutes; where the dialogue file labels a person differently, the label is noted.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneyBoard chairPresided (196 rows); took the auditor out of order; questioned the safety-specialist salary, accountability and camera monitoring and asked to defer it to April 2; seconded the calendar; spoke and, on the recording, voted against the Acuity letter; asked that the April 2 agenda take up achievement data.
Frank SpragueVice chair; Finance Sub-Committee chairAsked whether FY2020 findings were fixed in FY2021; raised the IRS/ACA matter; raised the federal English-language executive order and job-posting start dates; objected to the safety-specialist salary and grant reliance; moved the calendar and the Acuity letter, and adjournment.
Candace CrawfordBoard memberQuestioned the auditor on the report’s date and on follow-up; nominated as the board’s audit liaison; moved acceptance of the $4,000 donation; seconded the safety-specialist motion; drafted and read the Acuity letter.
Arlene HawkinsBoard member; Curriculum Committee representativeCorrected the agenda from FY2021 to FY2020; nominated Crawford as audit liaison; asked about the SAU audit; reported three audit-driven policies for March 19; mentioned a fair-funding petition as an individual matter.
Bonnie MilesBoard memberMoved to hire the safety specialist and withdrew the motion; seconded the Acuity letter (and the donation, per the minutes); thanked the superintendent for his statement on possible ICE visits; offered a piano to the music program.
Whitney SkillenBoard member; Policy Sub-Committee chairAsked about the safety specialist’s uniform, pay equity and a fixed-term contract; suggested a law-minded student help the Policy Sub-Committee. A different person from the chair, Heather Whitney.
Michael PetrinBoard memberAbsent (per the minutes)
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkTook the roll (addressed as “Noel Cronenberg” in the transcript at 0:00:35); submitted the minutes.
Miles SheehanStudent board member, Stevens High SchoolReported on music and theater and the loss of about 96 hours of band rehearsal; read his written account of the February 11 lockdown.
Lilly ClarkStudent board member, Stevens High SchoolReported winter athletics; described the lockdown from her classroom; answered on police presence, the hallway rule and the phone policy. The agenda and minutes spell her name Lilly; the dialogue file labels her “Lily Clark” (a normalization applied to the file on 2026-08-28), and the chair’s introduction at 0:01:54 is transcribed “miss Lily Clark”.
Christopher PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Presented the donation, the superintendent’s report (March 17 safety forum, new truancy officer Scott Maple), the safety-specialist proposal and the 2025–26 calendar.
Mary HenryBusiness AdministratorDistinguished policy from procedure; reported the IRS/ACA matter as inherited and in counsel’s hands; said journal entries now carry backup.
Patrick O’HearnHuman Resource DirectorAgreed to add start dates to job postings; confirmed the safety post would not come from Title I; answered Nope to whether anyone monitors hallway cameras.
Michael CampoPartner, Plodzik & Sanderson, P.A. (virtual)Presented the FY2020 audit conditions, the status of later years, and a proposal for monthly audit meetings with a designated board member. The transcript renders the firm “Plastic and Sanderson” and “Plasma and Sanders”.
Scott BlewittYouthCan Prevention Coordinator, West Central Behavioral HealthLed the 2023 Youth Risk Behavior Survey presentation (Exhibit A); title per the agenda.
Jennifer GallagherTurning Points Network (presenter)Presented harassment, dating-violence and mental-health-support data and Turning Points programs. The minutes give no title; the affiliation is from her own remarks.
Kari HagueTLC Family Resource Center (presenter)Presented TLC services, the SHINE curriculum and sexual-behavior and consent data. The minutes name “Kari Hague from TLC”; on the recording she introduces herself as “Kerry Rochford” (1:16:12) and Blewitt as “Kerry Rochford. Hague” (0:59:17). Full name not verified.
Hannah BrooksPresenterPresented Getting to Y, LGBTQ+ drop-in groups and a handout on survey reliability; described her employer as “Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical center slash greater Sullivan county public health network.”

No member of the public spoke; the minutes record citizens’ comments as “None.” Named on the record but not present: Scott Maple (new district truancy officer), Assistant Superintendent Michael Koski, and the Stevens High School principal, rendered “Doctor Harrington” in the transcript. The dialogue file labels 54 rows Unidentified.

Agenda

Items as posted in “CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf”, in the order taken up. The posted agenda numbers the action items 1–4 and 6–9 (no item 5); the minutes renumber them 1–8. Items were taken out of order.
Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:04I. Call to order & Pledge“I’d like to call to order the March 5th, 2025 school board meetings to please rise to the Pledge of Allegiance.”
0:00:35II. Roll callMinutes: present Crawford, Hawkins, Miles, Skillen, Sprague, Whitney; absent Petrin.
0:00:45II.a Consent agendaAgenda: “Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 3.5.25.” Whitney: “accepting the minutes from 2525. And I think that was 21525.” Hawkins at 0:01:15–0:01:20: “Our packet is FY 20.” The chair accepts the change at 0:01:21: “Consent agenda is approved.” Minutes: “Arlene Hawkins requested a read of the FY2020 audits and updates on other years”; “Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 2.15.25”; “Consent approval.” See flag 4.
0:01:54II.b Citizens’ comments“Is there anyone present wishing to speak this evening on a non agenda item? Okay. Seeing none.” Minutes: “None.”
0:02:20II.c Student board member reportAthletics, music and theater; a request to make band a double block; both students’ accounts of February 11 and answers to board and superintendent questions. About 22 minutes.
0:25:04IV.1 Results of FY 2021 Audit and FY 2022, FY 2023 Audit Progress Update (as amended: FY2020)Taken ahead of the superintendent’s report. Campo presented from 0:25:46 to 0:54:52. Hawkins nominated Crawford as audit liaison at 0:49:15; see flag 7. Discussion only.
0:55:16IV.2 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Presentation (Exhibit A)Four presenters on the 2023 survey; about 48 minutes. Discussion only.
1:44:54IV.4 S.A.L.T. Program Donation from Jack & Dorothy Byrne, $4000.00 (Exhibit C)Crawford moved at 1:45:58; voice vote at 1:45:59: “All in favor of accepting the donation? Say I, I motion passes to accept the donation.” Minutes: Crawford moved, Bonnie Miles seconded, all in favor. See flag 8.
1:46:31III. Superintendent’s reportWritten February report summarized; March 17 safety forum; strategic-plan work session; truancy officer hired. Board follow-ups on the English-language executive order, job-posting start dates and an April achievement-data discussion.
2:01:01IV.6 SHS Safety Specialist Proposal (Exhibit D)Miles moved to hire at 2:05:48; Crawford seconded at 2:06:04. About 27 minutes of discussion; Miles withdrew the motion at 2:32:54 so the item could return April 2. No vote. See flag 5.
2:34:12IV.3 2025-2026 District School Year Calendar (Exhibit B)Sprague moved at 2:36:21; Whitney seconded at 2:36:27; voice vote at 2:36:36, “Say, I, I not opposed.” The June meeting moves permanently to the Tuesday. See flag 6.
2:37:47IV.7 SRVRTC SignSigns so “folks that come to meetings and hearings will not come to the front door, and it’s locked and not know where to go.” Crawford to ask about the carpentry class and report back. No vote.
2:39:20IV.8 Citizens Comments Response Acuity Proposal (Exhibit E)Crawford read the letter; Sprague moved to endorse at 2:41:58; Miles seconded at 2:42:04; voice vote at 2:42:49. Minutes: “Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor.” See flag 1 and flag 9.
2:43:05IV.9 Sub-CommitteesFinance meeting set for April 4; Policy: three audit-driven policies for March 19; readouts otherwise suspended.
2:45:30V. Other businessCommittee-interest emails to the chair; retreat deferred until new members are seated; a piano offered; band rehearsal time; a fair-funding petition described as “individual. It’s not board.”
2:48:31VI. Future datesSafety discussion March 17; voting March 11; next meeting March 19; retreat to be scheduled. Thanks to departing members Miles and Skillen.
2:51:39VII. AdjournmentSprague: “Make a motion to adjourn.” Minutes: “Consent adjournment at 9:20pm.”

Discussion timeline

Chronological topics. Quotations are from the dialogue transcript as transcribed; bracketed text is an insertion or correction.
TimeTopicWhat was saidFlags
0:01:15The agenda names the wrong audit yearHawkins: “The results of the 2021 of water [audit] that the woman received in.” “Our packet is FY 20.” Whitney at 0:01:21: “Then we’ll accept that modification. To the agenda to read results of Fiscal year 2020 audits and update on 22 and 23.”MEDIUM
0:05:12Band rehearsal timeSheehan: when classes moved to year-long, “bands time was cut in half” and “we lost roughly 96 hours of rehearsal time.” At 0:06:05: “consider making band a double block next year.” Miles returns to it under other business at 2:47:03.
0:07:20Students on the adult reaction to February 11Clark: “There were a bunch of adults saying that we shouldn’t feel the way we felt because it was just a toy.” Students’ replies were put “in the packet to show you how respectful and responsible and, well, soft [thought-out] we all made those comments.”
0:08:12Sheehan reads his accountAt 0:08:35: “We all just thought it was a drill or fake, and we didn’t really think anything of it until we saw the police pull into the front.” At 0:08:58: “I could see through, like a tiny rip in the paper taped over the closet, window, the police sprinting up and down the hallways with their rifles in hand.” At 0:10:16: “Everyone in the community came together in those hours to keep us safe, and those hours afterwards to defend our experiences, despite the fact that we had to be defended at all.”
0:12:04Police presenceThe chair asks whether police in the building now frighten students. Clark at 0:12:15: “we felt safe and comforted by it because there were so many people”; “some people in my class were, they came in and had their, guns pointed right at us.” At 0:12:49: “you’re never prepared to be told to put your hands in the air with guns pointed at you.” At 0:15:25: “One of the kids got detained right outside my classroom door. We heard everything.”
0:21:00What the students say would helpClark: “if you wander the hallway, you’re immediately sent home for the night.” At 0:21:24: “we should think about the phone policy, because we wouldn’t have known if someone at the tech center didn’t see it online.” Sheehan at 0:23:41: “it’s at a spot where all we can do is tweak.”
0:25:46Campo on the engagement“We are the firm performing the audit of Claremont, Unity and Sussex [SAU 6]. In total, we do about 230 audits on an annual basis. And the majority of them don’t take multiple years to complete.” At 0:26:18: “One of the biggest challenges we’ve had is continuity of management over the years.”MEDIUM
0:26:37“the boxes of completed audits were still sealed”“We had some members of management in the past who were unreceptive, unavailable, or just flat out just weren’t that interested in the audit.” “working in the the Sussex [SAU 6] offices, I was a little frustrated to find when pulling records that the boxes of completed audits were still sealed in the this person’s, cabinet.” At 0:27:16: “They obviously didn’t make it to you.” At 0:27:37: “I did bring it to the assistant superintendents attention at that point.”MEDIUM
0:28:16FY2020: general ledger not maintained“One of the biggest issues is the General Electric [general ledger] maintenance.” At 0:28:37: “It wasn’t maintained. So what does that mean? Your balance sheet wasn’t reconciled on a regular basis.” “I don’t know how a school district can operate if they don’t know what they have in the bank.” At 0:29:23: “When you’re looking at budget to actual reports, those aren’t accurate either”; “So those statements are misstated.”MEDIUM
0:29:43Journal entries and stale-dated checks“during [journal] entries were being recorded, at a very high rate. They weren’t being approved, they weren’t being reviewed. And often they lacked formal formal documentation to support them.” Several outstanding checks were stale-dated; at 0:30:16: “They were six months or older.”MEDIUM
0:30:34No credit card policy; unauthorized reimbursements“Red [Credit] card policy. The school district at the time did not have a credit card policy.” At 0:31:21: staff were “purchasing items on their credit cards personally and then being reimbursed for it.” At 0:31:50: “we did not find evidence that these purchases were authorized.”MEDIUM
0:32:13“You guys set the tone at the top”The board “should be reviewing your financial policies, all of them over a three years.” At 0:32:41: “You guys set the tone at the top as the governing body of how the school district is supposed to perform.”
0:33:32Were the FY2020 problems fixed by FY2021?Sprague: “Have they been taken care of in the 21?” Campo at 0:33:41: “Some have been addressed, but some have not.” “we can’t just go into your office and then conduct the audit. We need the assistance of management.”MEDIUM
0:35:43“the report is dated July 21st, 2023”Crawford: “First of all, the report is dated July 21st, 2023. This is March of 25.” Campo at 0:36:43: “the 23 date is when that would have been shipped to you.” “We don’t need two years to ship a report.” At 0:37:08: “We from management side we can’t control when it’s district.”MEDIUM
0:38:14Who has oversightCampo: “We don’t have a oversight. However, the Department of Education gets your reports. They would have authority oversight.” On lenders, at 0:39:18: “Absolutely. That is a legitimate concern you have.” At 0:39:25: “You you, as a school district, receive a substantial amount of federal funds.”MEDIUM
0:43:36Policy versus procedureHenry: “there’s a difference between a policy and a procedure.” Campo at 0:44:37: “I don’t think it’s a bad idea though, to include the board in that discussion.” “they’re responsible for the financial statements.”
0:45:04A monthly audit meeting proposed“I would like to propose is that the board delegate one individual to do a monthly meeting with myself and your business administrator to do an update on where we stand on these audits.” At 0:48:40: “You’re either going to love me or hate me because I’m very persistent.”POSITIVE
0:49:15Crawford nominated as liaisonHawkins: “And I nominate Candace Crawford to be on board.” The “I second” at 0:49:18 is labeled Heather Whitney; the minutes record Whitney Skillen. No vote follows. Campo at 0:49:23: “I’d like to do Tuesday the 18th because that would be after the field work.” On the SAU audit, at 0:50:12: “I’m looking to do all three.”POSITIVE
0:50:46An IRS/ACA matterSprague: “an issue with the IRS that’s mentioned in there.” At 0:51:13: “top of the fold issue around the IRS and the ACA compliance.” Henry at 0:51:43: “We also have our attorneys involved in it to get that taken care of.” At 0:52:06: “That is something that we inherited.”MEDIUM
0:52:45The current administrationHenry: “we had to go back several years just to get our cash to a place where it was.” At 0:53:05: “journal entries are not done that way anymore. There’s backup for a journal entry.” Campo at 0:53:21: “in terms of the the administration you have now, they’ve been very cooperative.” At 0:54:04: “I do talk to your b a on a fairly regular basis, at least monthly checking in.”
0:59:17YRBS: presenters and timingBlewitt introduces the presenters. At 0:59:43: the survey was completed in 2023, “And then the CDC takes their time to analyze it.” At 1:00:50: YouthCan has “a budget of $125,000 a year.” At 1:38:01: response rate “66%, and it was 338 out of 515 students.”
1:02:50Alcohol and marijuana trends“back in 2013, 32.9% of the students had alcohol within 30 days.” At 1:03:10: “Is 15% too high. Of course it is.” At 1:05:37: marijuana 30-day use 17.6%, “ten years ago it was six points higher.”
1:07:21Prevention messages reach fewer students“it is 47.8% of the students recall seeing something.” At 1:08:00: “if you look ten years ago or even 2015, it was 73%.” Sprague at 1:08:40: “My suspicion is that kids are getting their information differently now.”
1:11:44Harassment and dating violenceGallagher: “Stephens [Stevens] is lower than both the region and the state.” “it’s 15%, which I would say is pretty high.” At 1:12:13: “13% of students reported that they were forced to have intercourse when they did not want to,” higher than region and state.
1:24:46Consent dataHague: “For Stephens [Stevens], 88%. The county 84, the state 77.” Gallagher at 1:24:10: “Age of consent in New Hampshire is 16, not 13.”
1:27:12Getting to YBrooks: “we really put the data in the hands of youth.” “It’s very much a student led initiative.”
1:43:54Resequencing a dense agendaWhitney: “a lot of things got bumped because of pressing items on the agenda.” At 1:44:39: “We already passed five. That was a unanimous vote.” The posted agenda has no item 5, and no vote had yet been taken.
1:44:54$4,000 SALT donationPratt: “we had a donation of $4,000 to the Salt, which stands for student Athlete Leadership Team.” Crawford at 1:45:58: “So move.” At 1:45:59: “Miss Crawford makes a motion to accept $4,000 from the, Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation for the Salt program.”POSITIVE
1:48:36Safety forum; truancy officerA school safety forum March 17, 6–8 p.m., Stevens auditorium; at 1:49:18: “This forum was set up in a direct response to the lockdown gun incident we had that occurred at Stevens High School on February 11th.” At 1:50:43: Scott Maple introduced “as the nutrition [truancy] officer.”
1:53:20English-language executive order; job postingsSprague: the order “suspends a Clinton era requirement that schools provide services for non-English speaking students.” Pratt at 1:54:29: “if they’re here, we’re going to support them and we’re going to provide them their education.” O’Hearn at 1:56:46: “I can tweak our job postings to reflect start dates.”
1:58:03Achievement data to AprilWhitney asks to “take half of the agenda for the first meeting in April and dedicated to talking about achievement data.” Hawkins agrees at 2:00:41.
2:01:01Safety specialist proposedPratt: “this is a direct response to what we know now based on the situation that took to the high school.” At 2:04:28: “I’ve checked with grants. The money is there.” At 2:04:56: “these particular students were in the hallway for over 40 minutes.” At 2:05:39: “any any new job description has to be approved by the board before it can be filled.”OBSERVATION
2:09:37Salary and qualificationsWhitney: “We’re looking at an average salary of 67,000 a year for an individual who has a high school diploma or an equivalency, and our teachers aren’t starting there.” Pratt at 2:12:36: “I want at least a bachelor’s degree.” Sprague at 2:28:03: “I think it’s way too much money. Chris.”OBSERVATION
2:16:35Accountability; camerasWhitney: “Who’s ultimately held accountable?” Pratt at 2:17:16: “Ultimately it’s the superintendent.” Whitney at 2:21:18: “So nobody monitors the camera in the hallway during passing hours?” O’Hearn: Nope. Pratt at 2:21:25: “The only time the cameras are looked at is if an incident takes place.”OBSERVATION
2:22:17Grant durabilitySprague: “the uncertainty of title money, anything coming from the federal government, I think is. I don’t I don’t dare to count on it.” Skillen at 2:23:14 proposes a one-year contract with a safety-plan deliverable. Pratt at 2:26:52: “Here would be like title for [Title IV] title for right now. We know we’re not maximizing the grants.”OBSERVATION
2:28:18Deferred to April 2; motion withdrawnWhitney: “we would be talking about positions and people within that are currently employees here.” “That’s a nonpublic.” At 2:31:15: “If we had this meeting on April 2nd, it would be after the community safety meeting.” Sprague at 2:31:32: “It makes it a response instead of a reaction.” Miles at 2:32:54: “With drawing. As long I know you’re going to, it’s going to be addressed.” Whitney at 2:33:47: “we’ll do a non public for April 2nd.”OBSERVATION
2:34:122025–26 calendar: no snow days built inPratt: “snow days are not built in, but this calendar stays within” the CBA; “We have no moose [MOUs].” Sprague at 2:34:50: “if we have to do 990 at the high school, 990 hours.” At 2:35:36 he cites the minimum standards as “994 or 9995 school, 1964 elementary” (garbled). Miles at 2:35:53: “Does the state identify number of school days.” Pratt: “Hours, hours?”OBSERVATION
2:39:35The Acuity letterCrawford: “at our last school board meeting, we had a couple of people from the community come and inform us.” At 2:40:08: “the school board stands in opposition to a proposal to bring a very large toxic waste sorting facility to Claremont, New Hampshire.” At 2:41:44: “I know we don’t take political positions. However, this is an advocacy for our children.”POSITIVE
2:42:25The chair votes noWhitney: “I feel very strongly about not engaging in municipal matters.” “So for me, it’s a no.” At 2:42:42: “I know I’m a minority.” The vote at 2:42:49: “All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me.”MEDIUM
2:43:47Audit-driven policiesHawkins: “At the March 19th meeting, the board will be getting three policies that are prompted by Grant’s audit.” “there will be two for updates. One asked to be rescinded.”POSITIVE
2:45:30Other businessMiles thanks Pratt for his statement on “Ice coming into the schools.” At 2:46:15: offers a piano. Hawkins at 2:51:09: a fair-funding petition; at 2:51:34: “it’s individual. It’s not board.”
2:48:54Departing members thankedWhitney: “Thank both of you for all your contributions and caring.” Skillen at 2:50:40: “I’m just in a season of my life where I don’t have enough time to be a school board member.”

Items flagged for review

These flags are a reviewer’s aid. They are not findings of violation and not legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on; an Observation rests on no confirmed rule.

MEDIUM The approved minutes record the Acuity vote as unanimous; the recording has the chair voting no

The approved minutes say that Whitney “spoke in opposition, because she believes strongly that the Board should not take a political stance and has not researched this enough, but she understands that she is the minority,” and then: “Voice vote taken, all present voting in favor.” On the recording she says “So for me, it’s a no” (2:42:25), and when she puts the question the transcript reads “All in favor? Aye, aye. Opposed me” (2:42:49). RSA 91-A:2, II requires minutes to record the subject matter and “final decisions.” The decision (endorse the letter) is recorded correctly, as are the mover and seconder, but a reader of the minutes alone would take an endorsement the presiding officer voted against for a unanimous one. The minutes were later approved (the Drive file is titled Approved) with this line unchanged.

Sources: RSA 91-A:2, II (minutes: subject matter and final decisions; mover and seconder); Approved CSB Meeting Minutes 3.5.25, item IV.7; the recording at 2:42:49.

MEDIUM FY2020 audit conditions: ledger not reconciled, unapproved journal entries, no credit card policy, reimbursements without evidence of authorization

Campo described the FY2020 conditions in his own words, and this page reports them for that year only. The general ledger “wasn’t maintained” and the balance sheet “wasn’t reconciled on a regular basis” (0:28:37), so budget-to-actual reports “aren’t accurate either” (0:29:23). Journal entries “weren’t being approved, they weren’t being reviewed” and “often they lacked formal formal documentation” (0:29:43). Several checks were stale-dated at six months or older, which he called a fraud-risk area (0:30:16). There was no credit card policy (0:30:34), and for staff reimbursements “we did not find evidence that these purchases were authorized” (0:31:50). Asked whether FY2021 fixed these, he said “Some have been addressed, but some have not” (0:33:41). For activity funded by federal awards, 2 CFR 200.303 requires the district to maintain effective internal control, and 2 CFR 200.318 requires documented procurement procedures. An IRS matter on Affordable Care Act compliance, which the business administrator called inherited and in counsel’s hands (0:51:43), remained open. Mitigation: the auditor praised the current administration’s cooperation (0:53:21), and the business administrator said journal entries now carry backup (0:53:05).

Sources: 2 CFR 200.303 (internal control over federal awards); 2 CFR 200.318 (procurement standards); RSA 21-J:19 (school districts may hire independent auditors); Approved minutes 3.5.25, item IV.1.

MEDIUM Five fiscal years behind: FY2020 audit findings first presented to the board in March 2025

The FY2020 audit report is dated July 21, 2023 (0:35:43). Campo said that date is when the report was issued to management (0:36:43) and that he once found “the boxes of completed audits were still sealed” in a cabinet at the SAU offices (0:26:37). At this meeting the firm was in fieldwork on FY2021, with FY2022 through FY2024 still to come; the chair framed it as “the fiscal year 20 audit and talk about where we’re at with 21, 22, 23, 24” (0:25:20). The agenda itself named the wrong year and was corrected from the floor (0:01:15). Board members had the report by email (0:50:46); it is not in the public packet folder. Why MEDIUM and not HIGH: in 2025 RSA 21-J:19 let a district hire an auditor but set no completion deadline, so the backlog alone is a control weakness, not a missed state deadline. Federal law does set one: a district that spends $750,000 or more of federal awards in a fiscal year must submit its single audit within 30 days of receiving the auditor’s report or nine months after year end, whichever is earlier; for FY2020 that was March 31, 2021. Campo said the district receives “a substantial amount of federal funds” (0:39:25), but the record does not state the district’s federal expenditures for these years. Confirming them would move this to HIGH. The 2026 reenactment of RSA 198:4-d, which now sets a nine-month audit deadline, took effect July 1, 2026 and did not apply at this meeting.

Sources: RSA 21-J:19 (permissive; no completion deadline); 2 CFR 200.501 ($750,000 threshold for these fiscal years); 2 CFR 200.512(a)(1) (submission deadline); 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 272 (SB 586), approved July 2, 2026, eff. July 1, 2026.

OBSERVATION The consent agenda approved minutes of a “2.15.25” meeting that appears nowhere else

The posted agenda lists “Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 3.5.25”, the second date being this meeting itself. The chair says “accepting the minutes from 2525. And I think that was 21525” (0:00:45). The approved minutes record “Minutes Approval- 2.5.25 & 2.15.25.” No February 15, 2025 meeting appears in the project’s meeting map, and the February 5 minutes had already been approved by consent on February 19. The likeliest reading is that the minutes meant to be approved were the February 19 minutes: the approved version of those was filed in the district’s Drive share on March 7, 2025, two days after this meeting. No document says so. Three records of one consent item disagree on which minutes were approved.

Sources: CSB Agenda 3.5.25 (2).pdf; Approved minutes 3.5.25, item II.a; Approved minutes 2.19.25; RSA 91-A:2, II.

OBSERVATION A grant-funded safety position proposed, debated for 27 minutes, and withdrawn; the job description and the practice described on tape differ on cameras

Exhibit D proposes a Stevens High School Safety Specialist at a salary range of $65,000 to $70,000 (midpoint $67,500; about $79,425 with benefits and equipment), requiring “A high school diploma or equivalent”, to be funded from the Title IV grant and vacant positions. Its duties include “Regularly check and review security camera footage”; on the recording the board heard that nobody monitors hallway cameras and “The only time the cameras are looked at is if an incident takes place” (2:21:25). Members raised pay equity with teachers and police (2:09:37, 2:28:03), grant durability (2:22:17), and accountability (2:16:35). The chair said a full discussion concerned “positions and people” and belonged in nonpublic session (2:28:18), and proposed one for April 2 (2:33:47). Under RSA 91-A:3, II, a new position’s design and pay range is not itself a ground; II(a) covers the dismissal, promotion, compensation or discipline of a public employee, II(b) “The hiring of any person”, and II(i) emergency-function preparation developed by safety officials. Any April 2 motion should state which applies. Miles withdrew her motion (2:32:54) so the item could follow the March 17 forum. No vote was taken.

Sources: Exhibit D- School Safety Specialist Proposal (Title IV) (1).pdf; RSA 91-A:3, I(b), II(a), II(b), II(i) (text read 2026-09-25); Approved minutes 3.5.25, item IV.5.

OBSERVATION The 2025–26 calendar was adopted with no snow days built in and the state minimum checked from memory

The superintendent presented the calendar as within the collective bargaining agreement with no memoranda of understanding and no built-in snow days (2:34:12; “We didn’t we couldn’t build in the snow days because of the way the contract language is,” 2:35:19). Sprague worked the hours aloud; his 990 hours for the high school (2:34:50) matches the rule, while the figures at 2:35:36 are garbled in the transcript. Miles asked whether the state sets a number of days, and was told “Hours, hours?” (2:35:58). The rule in force since December 13, 2024 requires 180 days of instruction or the hour equivalents (at least 450 hours for kindergarten, 945 for grades 1–6, 990 for grades 7–12), so both measures are available. The packet’s Exhibit B is the calendar itself, filed under a “24-25” name, and no hours calculation was put before the board before the voice vote (2:36:36).

Sources: N.H. Admin. R. Ed 306.15 (School Year; Doc. #14150, eff. 12-13-24); RSA 189:1 (180 days or the equivalent hours set by rule); Exhibit B- draft 24-25 Claremont School Year Calendar (1).pdf.

POSITIVE A standing audit-oversight channel, set up at the auditor’s request the same night

Campo asked the board to “delegate one individual to do a monthly meeting with myself and your business administrator” (0:45:04). Hawkins nominated Crawford (0:49:15), a first meeting was set for “Tuesday the 18th” (0:49:23), and Campo committed to bringing Claremont, Unity and SAU 6 current together (0:50:12). Later Hawkins reported three policies “prompted by Grant’s audit” for the March 19 packet (2:43:47). Two record caveats: the minutes name Whitney Skillen as seconder where the dialogue file labels the voice Heather Whitney, and neither record shows a vote on the nomination.

Sources: 2 CFR 200.303; Approved minutes 3.5.25, items IV.1 and IV.8.

POSITIVE A private donation accepted by named motion and public vote, noticed on the agenda and recorded in the minutes

The $4,000 Jack and Dorothy Byrne Foundation donation to the Stevens Student Athlete Leadership Team was a separate agenda item with the donor letter posted as Exhibit C, moved by Crawford (1:45:58), and carried by voice vote in open session (1:45:59); the minutes record mover, seconder and amount. For gifts under $20,000, RSA 198:20-b, III(b) (in force from July 18, 2023) requires the board to “post notice in agenda and include notice in meeting minutes.” Both were done.

Sources: RSA 198:20-b, III(b) (2023, 38:1, eff. July 18, 2023); Exhibit C- Jack and Dorothy Byrnes Foundation Donation (1).pdf; Approved minutes 3.5.25, item IV.4.

POSITIVE Public comment from February 19 answered through a noticed agenda item with the draft posted in advance

At the February 19 meeting (show 16351) the chair read that board response to public comment “will be deferring pending a full board consideration,” and a resident asked the board to take a position on the Acuity proposal. Two weeks later the response came back as a titled agenda item, “Citizens Comments Response Acuity Proposal (Discussion/Vote) Exhibit E”, with the letter’s text in the public packet, a motion, a stated dissent and a vote (2:39:20–2:42:49). That is the path Policy BEDH describes, and it let the public read the letter before the board adopted it.

Sources: Exhibit E- ACUITY; Policy BEDH; February 19, 2025 page.

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page