Claremont School Board, Budget Public Hearing — January 15, 2025

The public hearing on the FY2026 school budget under RSA 32:5, followed by a short board meeting in the same session, built from the Cablecast recording, the dialogue transcript, the posted packet and the approved minutes. Centerpieces: a $42,933,564 proposed budget against a $42,772,778 default, and the suspension of the district preschool program. Timestamps link to the same moment in the Cablecast recording.

Body
Claremont School Board (SAU 6): budget public hearing, then a board meeting in the same session. Chair: Heather Whitney.
Date
Wednesday, January 15, 2025
Start time
6:30 p.m. scheduled; called to order at 0:00:04. Public hearing closed at 1:17:12 (7:47 p.m. per the minutes, which matches a 6:30 start). Board meeting called to order at 1:18:01; consent adjournment 7:57 p.m. per the minutes.
Location
Sugar River Valley Regional Technical Center, Claremont; audio broadcast on CCTV Channel 8, per the agenda
Recording
Cablecast: Claremont School Board - 1/15/25 (1:27:42; continuous, covers the hearing and the board meeting)
Minutes
13. Approved CSB Public Hearing minutes 1.15.25 (approved; one document covers both the hearing and the board meeting)
Board composition
Seven members; six present. Bonnie Miles absent. Crawford arrived 6:32 p.m. per the minutes.

Participants

Board, administration and citizens'-comment speakers. Name spellings and wards follow the approved 1.15.25 minutes where the automatic transcript differs; roles the record does not state are marked as such.
NameRoleParticipation
Heather WhitneySchool Board Chair; Finance SubcommitteePresided over the hearing and the board meeting (90 segments); gave the chair's remarks on curriculum, special-education funding and the preschool cost (0:41:02); ran public comment.
Frank SpragueVice Chair; Finance Subcommittee chairOpened the presentation with the finance subcommittee's account of the budget build and the preschool decision (0:04:49).
Candace CrawfordBoard member; Finance SubcommitteeArrived 6:32 p.m. per the minutes; budget history and district statistics (0:49:49); clarified which preschool services continue.
Arlene HawkinsBoard memberExplained her earlier opposition to ending preschool; board representative on the administrators' contract; asked for plain-language tax figures.
Michael PetrinBoard memberEstimated the district's three-to-five population for Merchant; raised a public email at the board meeting; asked whether a vote was needed. Rendered "Mr. Peterson" and "Mr. Peter" by the transcript.
Whitney SkillenBoard memberAsked that future presentations be "Public friendly, lay person. Friendly" (1:23:49). Rendered "Miss Gillam" by the transcript.
Bonnie MilesBoard memberAbsent (approved minutes, both the hearing and the board meeting)
Noelle KronbergSchool Board ClerkKept time for public comment; submitted the minutes. Not heard speaking on the recording.
Christopher PrattSuperintendent, SAU 6Played the district's new promotional video (0:09:28) and read a statement tying the budget to the strategic plan (0:13:40); 51 segments across the presentation and answers.
Mary HenryBusiness Administrator, SAU 6Presented the default budget, the proposed budget, revenues and all four warrant articles (61 segments); credited by the minutes with answering the $209,178 School Board line question.
Patrick O'HearnHuman Resource Director, SAU 6Staffing: vacancies, hiring volume and turnover (0:30:28)
Matt BeanCitizens' comments, Ward 1Kindergarten/grade 1 special educator at Maple Avenue School, per the minutes and his own statement; spoke against ending preschool (1:00:55)
Charlene LovettCitizens' comments, Ward 2Spoke against ending preschool and asked what the $209,178 School Board line funds; said she had served on the school board. The minutes and the recording give her no other title, and none is asserted here.
Gary MerchantCitizens' comments, Ward 2Two turns at the hearing (the state budget; preschool equity) and a board-meeting notice of a school-funding presentation. Said he spoke "as a citizen". Rendered "Gary Marchant" by the transcript; spelling per the minutes.
Rob LovettCitizens' comments, Ward 2Spoke at the board meeting for the TLC recovery center on the Recovery Friendly Workplace Initiative (1:18:56)
UnidentifiedVoices in the SAU 6 promotional video; one pre-meeting remarkTen segments of recorded staff audio played from 0:09:28; not live participants
Michael Koski · Michael McCosker · Jeff SmallAsst. Superintendent · Director of Student Services · Director of TechnologyListed on the agenda and minutes header; not heard on the recording
Miles Sheehan · Lilly ClarkStudent board membersListed on the agenda and minutes header; not recorded present or speaking

Agenda

From the posted packet agenda, CSB Public Hearing Agenda 1.15.25.docx (1).pdf (the doubled extension and "(1)" are in the district's file name). Its clock times are scheduled, not actual: it puts the board meeting at 7:03 p.m., but the hearing closed at 7:47 p.m. The approved minutes repeat the scheduled times. Quotations in this table are from the agenda or the minutes unless a speaker is named. Hover over (or Tab to) a clipped entry for full text.

Taken upItemAgenda text / disposition
0:00:04Hearing I. Call to order and PledgeAgenda: "6:30 PM Call to order & Pledge of Allegiance." Whitney: "The Claremont School Board public hearing for January 15th, 2025."
0:00:40Hearing II. Roll callPresent per the approved minutes: Crawford (arrived 6:32 p.m.), Hawkins, Petrin, Skillen, Sprague, Whitney. Absent: Miles. The recording captures only one response, Here.
0:02:24Hearing III. Overview of the FY2026 Default BudgetHenry read a definition of the default budget, walked from the $39,962,266 FY25 approved budget, and gave the default as $42,772,778, with the proposed budget $160,786 higher. See flag 1.
0:04:49Hearing IV.a. FY2026 Proposed Budget PresentationAgenda: "FY2026 Proposed Budget Presentation (Discussion)". Sprague; then Pratt's video and statement; Henry on cost drivers, revenues and the four warrant articles; O'Hearn on staffing; then Whitney and Crawford. Discussion only; no vote is taken at a hearing.
1:00:08Hearing V. Citizens CommentsAgenda: "During this time, only questions and comments directly related to the budget will be heard." Three minutes each; a two-minute second turn. Speakers: Matt Bean (Ward 1), Charlene Lovett (Ward 2), Gary Merchant (Ward 2, two turns), with board and administration answering.
1:17:12Hearing V. Closing of Public HearingWhitney: "Is there any other members of the public who would like to speak before we close the public hearing? Seeing none. Public hearing is closed." Minutes: "Public Hearing closed at 7:47pm".
1:18:01Meeting I–II. Call to order; consent agendaAgenda: "Consent Agenda (vote required)", with the 12.18.24 minutes. Whitney asked for objections and said "Seeing none, we'll accept consent agenda as approved." No motion or vote was taken; the minutes record "Consent approval".
1:18:55Meeting III. Citizens Comments (Policy BEDH)Two speakers, both Ward 2: Rob Lovett on the Recovery Friendly Workplace Initiative; Gary Merchant on a school-funding presentation in Newport the next evening.
1:22:18Meeting IV.1. Board Discussion on Public HearingSprague: the comments "sort of echoed our own deliberations within the board itself." Whitney asked for gaps in the board's transparency (1:23:05), which produced the plain-language requests.
1:26:19Meeting IV.2. Review preparation for Deliberative SessionThe finance committee will rework the presentation. Petrin: "Do we need a vote to move this? To deliver?" Whitney: "No. We're going to do the vote next Tuesday." That vote was taken at the January 21 meeting.
1:27:29Meeting V. AdjournmentWhitney: "We want to give people time to think and reflect. And so there is no emotional voting." Minutes: "Consent adjournment 7:57pm".

Discussion timeline

Times are from the dialogue transcript. Quotations reproduce the automatic transcript as transcribed, garbles included; brackets mark insertions or corrections. Budget-line figures not spoken aloud are from the packet's Claremont Budget Summary 1-13-25.pdf and are attributed to it.

TimeTopicWhat was said (leading text; hover/focus for more)Flags
0:00:42How the hearing will runWhitney: "Here present is everyone from the public who is taking time out of their evening to come to this public hearing and share your thoughts on the topic, which is, the budget for fiscal year 2526." Order: Sprague, Henry and the administration, the rest of the finance committee, then the podium. "This evening it is a one topic agenda. So please limit your comments to the budget. Every citizen will have three minutes to provide their comment." For anyone unwilling to speak: "you can simply come up and say, I'm with her or I'm with him and I agree."POSITIVE
0:02:24Default budget: $42,772,778Henry read the definition: "the amount of the same appropriations as contained and the operating budget authorized for the previous year reduced and increased as the case may be, by debt services, contracts, and other obligations previously incurred or mandated by law and reduced by one time expenditures contained in the operating budget." She stopped there. From the $39,962,266 FY25 budget she reduced "$6,000,622 $622,120" [about $6.62 million] for the bond payment and out-of-district tuition and transportation, and increased it by $9,432,632 for bonds, contracts, health, dental, retirement, workers' compensation, SAU expenses and out-of-district tuition. "So the default budget is $42,772,778." The proposed budget "is $42,000,933 and 560 $0.04 [$42,933,564], which makes the proposed budget $160,786 more than our default." No reduction for eliminated positions was named.MEDIUM POSITIVE
0:04:49Sprague: how the budget was cutProcess began October 2024. "The initial budget presented to the Finance Committee of the school board reflected a $4.2 million increase, roughly an 11% increase," before the teachers', paraprofessionals' and administrators' contracts; drivers included about $1.5 million in health insurance, the teachers' contract at 514,000, and increases of $1.5 million at the middle school and $1.8 million at the high school, "to a great degree, were driven by out of district placements". Goal: "to limit the tax impact of the budget to a 5% increase." Unaddressed, budget plus contracts "would irresponsibly place an unreasonable burden on taxpayers, it would be 12 or 13%."
0:08:02Preschool suspendedSprague: board data showed the preschool program "has not helped identified students integrate into kindergarten, and even model students underperformed compared to their peers who attend private preschool, Head Start or no program at all." The program "will require a complete rebuilding to meet the definition of quality". "The board has requested and the administration has reluctantly agreed to suspend the preschool classroom until critical work at the elementary schools is completed."MEDIUM
0:13:40Pratt: budget and strategic planAfter the recruitment video, Pratt read a statement: the budget is tied to the strategic plan, with focus on student well-being, family and community engagement and district-office cohesion. "This includes not allowing resources to support programs that are not delivering the outcomes our students deserve."
0:16:52What drove the increaseHenry: health insurance up 15%, dental 10%, "a total of $1.2 million to the bottom line of our budget." Out-of-district placement up 1.4 million; special education 87,000. "the overall budget increase was 2.9 million or 7.44%." Revenues up 2.1 million, adequacy aid up 1.9 million, investment income up 175,000 after moving to a sweep account ("We were making $20,000 a year. Now we're making over 200,000"). "after revenues, the total increase is $845,952, which is 2.1% before other Warren [warrant] articles." The Budget Summary gives the same $845,952 (2.12%).
0:21:15Hold-harmless step-downAdequacy aid rises to about 16 million, driven by the extraordinary-needs grant factor ("they change that from being 8500 to 11,500"), even though "we're down on student count for the estimated." The hold-harmless grant will fall: "It's going to decrease by $329,386. Until this number is gone."
0:22:07The four warrant articlesArticle 1: "two school board member openings for three year terms, the moderator, the district clerk and the district treasurer for one year terms." Article 2: general fund $39,468,564 plus a $3,465,000 grant and food-service budget. Pratt corrected Henry's total from the floor ("393. 43."); Henry: "Oh, I'm sorry. 42. My bad." The warrant figure: "42,000,933 564" [$42,933,564]. Tax impact: "a 27 cent increase, or 1.9% to the tax rate", plus "$0.42 to the tax rate, or 2.9%" for the first year of the teachers' contract.
0:25:23Social workers moved to a grantHenry: "We did remove two social worker positions from the budget, but they will be funded by grants." Pratt: "between 125 and $175,000 a year". The Budget Summary shows line 2113 Social Worker falling from $302,466 to $113,602 (-62.44%).
0:26:14Costs moved between linesHenry moved technology staff into regular education and separated speech and language "because that's where they belong for our state DOH [DOE]". Budget Summary: line 2150 Speech Pathology from $103,105 to $376,198; line 2160 C.O.T.A from $331,411 to $562,648; line 1230 Related Services to zero.
0:28:21Positions adjusted, and "Pre-K program close"Henry, on "budget related FTE adjustments": "we have adjusted our efforts with five teachers and benefits for 334,004.35 pair of positions, with benefits for 185,000." She reduced a middle-school guidance post, added a teaching program at Sugar River Valley at 102,000, and lowered amounts budgeted for top-of-scale vacancies. Then: "Pre-K program close but still meet special education needs for all the students that we serve."MEDIUM
0:30:28O'Hearn on staffing"Thanks mayor" [Mary]. Current vacancies across teaching, paraprofessional and counselor positions; "we hire, just about 30 to 40 staff members annually, 22 teachers last year, 18 paraprofessionals and a counselor." "I think we need to use attrition as an opportunity". Pratt: turnover "Still significantly less than you saw in 23 and 24."
0:35:36Articles 3 and 4Article 3, three-year paraprofessional contract: "for fiscal year 2526 the increase would be 168,000 2627 139 2728 137. So the tax impact for the first year of the contract is 0.97%, or $0.14 on the tax rate." Article 4, one-year administrators' contract: "78,045% or $0.06 on the tax rate" (the minutes give .45% and 6 cents). One year "because we're trying to get our contracts to alternate". All contracts together: "It would be $0.89 to the tax rate".
0:39:50The ESSER cliffHenry: "we had used Esser for about $600,000 in 24 for out of district placement costs. That is now being burdened by us now." Pratt: "$660,000 out of s [ESSER] or before we no longer have." The two figures were not reconciled on the record.
0:41:02Whitney: what the board found"We discovered that we did not have a functioning curriculum." At 0:46:02: "We're only receiving 67% reimbursement for our special education costs, so we had to take money somewhere else in the budget to cover those costs." Then: "Anything related to special education is utterly fixed. It's like a sacred cow." On preschool: "$17,000 per student per year at the preschool, with roughly a total of $50,000 that is expended from Claremont taxpayers on a child that goes for three years".OBSERVATION
0:49:49Crawford: history and scaleThree drivers: the end of ESSER, years of uncompetitive pay, and curriculum. She pointed viewers to the finance committee's recordings on CCTV. Scale: about 1,500 students, with IEP rates put as "That's a 27% that compares to about 18% statewide"; about 327 full-time and 75 part-time employees.
0:57:27Collective bargainingWhitney thanked the teachers for accepting "a very modest proposal" so paraprofessional pay could rise: "For the first time in many, many years, our teachers salaries are competitive." Crawford negotiated the paraprofessional contract, Hawkins the administrators'.
1:00:55Matt Bean, Ward 1: reform, don't remove"Full disclosure I am the kindergarten first grade, special ed, self-contained teacher at Maple Avenue School, but I'll be making my comments right now as a citizen". "I understand that this decision did not come without an educated decision making process." His ask: "I would like to see the course of action to be reformed our preschool program, not remove our preschool program".POSITIVE
1:02:45Charlene Lovett, Ward 2: early intervention; a $209,178 line"Good evening. I'm Charlene Lovett, Ward two. I just want to say thank you for the presentation. Because it is much different than when I was on the school board, and I think it's an improvement." "And how much money are we going to spend if we don't do these early interventions?" On a line she did not recognize: "That's for $209,178. So I don't know what that is for." The answer from the table was legal fees. The dialogue file gives it to Whitney; the minutes credit Henry. The Budget Summary shows line 2310 School Board at $209,178, up $5,000.
1:05:09Gary Merchant, Ward 2: the state budget"Gary Marchant [Merchant], Ward two I'm here as a citizen." At 1:05:33: "I'm concerned about the reduction on special ed from 95% to 67%." "Revenues are down. Safes [the State] been known to downshift things. They downshift pension programs onto us." He then asked what share of the district's three-to-five-year-olds the 43 enrolled children represent.OBSERVATION
1:07:0443 enrolled, 23 servedPetrin estimated about 300 children aged three to five. Whitney: "the 43 kids, are the total number of students that are enrolled in the program, but only 23 of them. That program exists for 23 students." Typical peers were hard to recruit "because of the hours of the program are not very worker family friendly." The program was opened "to serve special, special needs students to reduce special education costs".
1:09:14What continuesCrawford: "the services that must be delivered to that preschool population are still in the budget." Hawkins, who "spoke in opposition to the preschool being eliminated" at the full board: "We really do not have a choice. And we need to make it better."
1:11:49Pratt: space as well as money"we're not going to get to universal pre-K all the way." "right now the problem is, is that we don't have the space to have pre-K in all elementary schools". Asked about funding: "Yes in the funding because but you know you can't fund for something if you have no place to put it right."
1:14:50Merchant's second turn: equityWhitney: "That's your second second time, Mr. Merchant. Go ahead." Merchant: "My concern is that with special ed or with preschool, if it's not universal, it's not equitable." Whitney agreed that equity and access were among the board's objections to the existing program.POSITIVE
1:17:12Hearing closed"Public hearing is closed." Pratt thanked those who came. Whitney at 1:17:53: "Deliberative session is February 1st."OBSERVATION POSITIVE
1:18:56Rob Lovett: Recovery Friendly Workplace"My name is Rob Lovett, Ward two. I'm actually coming to you tonight as a representative of the TRC [TLC] Resource Center, as well as the Recovery Friendly Workplace Initiative." The designation "is 100% free to all employers".
1:21:13Merchant: school-funding presentation"there is going to be a presentation by the New Hampshire School Funding Fairness Project in Newport tomorrow night at 6:00". Crawford asked whether it was nonpartisan; Merchant: "this is Nonpartizan. This is educational only."
1:23:49Make it legible to a lay readerSkillen: "Public friendly, lay person. Friendly person who can't read charts." Hawkins: "Present it so that it's I as a taxpayer completely understand what that means for me and my taxes." Whitney proposed a sample tax bill; Henry said she had shown a $200,000-house example at the previous deliberative session and would do so again.POSITIVE
1:27:20Vote deferred to January 21Petrin: "Do we need a vote to move this? To deliver?" Whitney: "No. We're going to do the vote next Tuesday." At 1:27:29: "We want to give people time to think and reflect. And so there is no emotional voting." The articles were moved at the January 21 meeting at the same dollar figure.POSITIVE

Items flagged for review

Flags are a reviewer's aid generated by comparing the meeting record against state and federal law in force on January 15, 2025. They are not findings of violation, and nothing here is legal advice. Each flag cites the rule it rests on.

MEDIUM The default budget as presented shows no deduction for eliminated positions, in the year the preschool program was closed

For an official-ballot district, RSA 40:13, IX(b) defines the default budget as the prior year's operating budget adjusted for debt service, contracts and other obligations, "reduced by one-time expenditures contained in the operating budget and by salaries and benefits of positions that have been eliminated in the proposed budget", excluding vacant positions under recruitment and positions redefined in the proposed budget. Henry read the definition aloud at 0:02:24 and stopped before the eliminated-positions clause. Her walk from $39,962,266 to $42,772,778 named reductions for the bond payment and out-of-district tuition and transportation, and no reduction for eliminated positions. The same presentation announced "Pre-K program close" among the "budget related FTE adjustments" (0:28:21), and Sprague described the preschool classroom as suspended (0:08:02). If preschool positions were eliminated rather than redefined, their salaries and benefits belong in the default calculation, which would lower the default. RSA 40:13, XI(a) requires a default budget form identifying each change by account code and the reductions for eliminated positions; no such form is in the hearing packet (four documents, reviewed 2026-09-25) or the minutes. Mitigation: the form may exist in the filing to the Department of Revenue Administration, and staff may have been reassigned, which the statute excludes. The record does not settle it; the form would.

Sources: RSA 40:13, IX(b) and XI(a) (default budget definition and form; 2019, 192:2, eff. July 10, 2019); packet folder 12. CSB Budget Public Hearing 1.15.25.

OBSERVATION Public notice of the hearing is not documented in the packet or the minutes

RSA 32:5, I requires notice of the budget hearing "at least 7 days in advance", and RSA 40:13, II-a(a) sets the second Tuesday in January (January 14, 2025) as the last day to post notice of budget hearings in an official-ballot district. The packet folder holds the agenda, the budget summary and full proposed budget (both dated 1/13/2025) and the prior meeting's draft minutes; it holds no posting record or newspaper notice, and the minutes are silent on notice. This is a documentation gap, not an asserted violation: notice may have been given and not filed, and residents did attend and speak. A reader cannot verify it from the district's published record.

Sources: RSA 32:5, I (hearing notice at least 7 days in advance; paragraph unchanged by 2025, 144:1); RSA 40:13, II-a(a); packet folder (4 documents).

OBSERVATION The 67% special-education figure matches the State's FY2025 catastrophic-aid proration, which covers only part of special-education costs

The chair gave a 67% reimbursement rate as the reason reductions had to fall on regular education (0:46:02), and Merchant spoke of "the reduction on special ed from 95% to 67%" (1:05:33). The number is consistent with reporting that the State funded FY2025 special-education (catastrophic) aid at 67.5% of district entitlements, down from 87% in 2023 and 98.3% in 2022. In January 2025, RSA 186-C:18, III provided that when the appropriation fell short it "shall be prorated proportionally based on entitlement"; there was no minimum. The 80%-of-entitlement floor in today's text came from 2025 legislation that post-dates this meeting, so the proration was lawful. What the chair's wording overstates is the base: this aid reaches only a district's costs for a child above three and one-half times the state average expenditure per pupil, not all special-education costs. Neither the presentation nor the packet quantified the dollar shortfall.

Sources: RSA 186-C:18, III, 2024 codification (proration based on entitlement; 2023, 79:141, 142); New Hampshire Bulletin, November 15, 2024 (reporting the 67.5% rate).

POSITIVE The hearing was held within the statutory January calendar, and the default budget was disclosed at it

In an official-ballot district, RSA 40:13, II-a(c) requires budget hearings under RSA 32:5 to be held on or before the third Tuesday in January, which in 2025 was January 21. The hearing was held January 15. Paragraph II-a opens "Notwithstanding any other provision of law", so the 25-day interval in RSA 32:5, I does not govern against the February 1 first session; the statute's own calendar does. RSA 40:13, XI(a) requires the default budget to be disclosed and presented for questions at the first budget hearing; Henry did so first, before the proposed budget (0:02:24). The presentation also gave separate tax impacts for each warrant article and ran about an hour before the podium opened.

Sources: RSA 40:13, II-a(c), III and XI(a) (2019, 192:2); RSA 32:5, I; approved 1.15.25 minutes.

POSITIVE No appropriation was added after the hearing

RSA 32:5, II bars the governing body from inserting, after the final hearing, an amount or purpose of appropriation not disclosed or discussed there without a further hearing. The board declined to vote on the night (1:27:20). At the January 21 meeting it moved Articles 1 through 4 to the deliberative session with Article 2 at the same $42,933,564; the recorded changes were a correction to Article 1 (two board seats, not three) and a punctuation fix. Articles remained amendable by the voters at the February 1 first session under RSA 40:13, IV, a separate mechanism.

Sources: RSA 32:5, II (no insertion after the final hearing); RSA 40:13, IV; approved 1.21.25 minutes.

POSITIVE Public comment was taken, answered in the room, and invited as criticism

RSA 189:74 requires a school board to provide an opportunity for public comment, for "no less than 30 minutes", at its meetings. The hearing's comment period ran from 1:00:08 to 1:17:12, about 17 minutes, and the board meeting's from 1:18:55 to 1:22:18, about 3 minutes; in each the chair asked for further speakers before closing, and no one was turned away. Whether the 30 minutes is a floor on the opportunity or on elapsed time is not settled by the text; on this record the opportunity stayed open until no one else came forward. Beyond that, the chair applied the posted second-turn rule in a speaker's favor (1:14:50), offered a way to register support without speaking, had every question answered on the record, and asked the board for "any gaps in our transparency" (1:23:05), then committed to a plainer presentation for the deliberative session.

Sources: RSA 189:74 (public comment period; 2022, 333:1); CSB Public Hearing Agenda 1.15.25 (comment guidelines).

Appendix — source files

Official and public sources

Project files

Working files this page was built from. The dialogue file is linked; the others are not published with the page.

Laws and rules cited on this page